Peer Review of Elly’s Assignment

To: Elly Kim

From: Chris Wu

Term: Semiconductor

Definition link: https://blogs.ubc.ca/engl30199c2022w2/2023/02/06/assignment-write-three-definitions/

Thank you for submitting the writing on the topic of Semiconductors. The following is my evaluation of the document, along with suggestions for its improvement.

First Impressions:

  • The three definitions provided are clear and concise, and effectively convey the key features and uses of semiconductors.
  • The use of different definition styles is helpful in providing multiple perspectives on the term.
  • The introduction is well-written and sets up the purpose of the task clearly.

Organization:

  • The text is well-organized and easy to follow.
  • All three definitions are clearly separated with headings, and the expanded definition is further broken down into different sections.
  • The visual included is relevant to the content and is well-placed in the document.
  • The works cited list is complete and properly formatted.

Expression:

  • The parenthetical and sentence definitions are easily understandable for the target audience.
  • The expanded definition provides a more detailed overview of the term and effectively explains the key features of semiconductors, including doping and bandgap.
  • The example given in the expanded definition is helpful in illustrating the concept.
  • The use of technical terms is appropriate for the target audience and the writing is generally clear and concise.

Content:

  • The definitions provided are comprehensive and effectively convey the key features and uses of semiconductors.
  • The explanation of conductivity and energy bandgap is particularly helpful in understanding how semiconductors work.
  • The section on different materials used in semiconductors is informative and effectively illustrates the variety of applications for these materials.

Visuals:

  • The visual included is relevant to the content and effectively illustrates the concept of bandgap.
  • It is well-placed in the document and is appropriately cited.

Works Cited:

  • The works cited list is complete and properly formatted.
  • Would be helpful to have more in-text citations for listed works.

Grammar and Typos:

  • The document is well-written with no grammatical errors or typos.

Concluding Comments:

  • Overall, this is an effective write-up that provides a comprehensive overview of the term “semiconductor.”
  • The use of different definition styles is helpful in providing multiple perspectives, and the content is well-organized and easy to follow.
  • The use of technical terms is appropriate for the target audience and the writing is generally clear and concise.
  • The submission effectively conveys the key features and uses of semiconductors, and there are no major omissions or errors.

Thank you Elly, for submitting your work for peer review. If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to reach out. A pleasure reading your work.

 

 

 

2 comments on “Peer Review of Elly’s Assignment
  1. EllyKim says:

    I couldn’t see any content on the page. Do you mind taking a look and making sure everything’s uploaded properly?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*