{"id":666,"date":"2022-12-07T19:00:00","date_gmt":"2022-12-08T02:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/eoasquest\/?page_id=666"},"modified":"2025-03-19T11:49:15","modified_gmt":"2025-03-19T18:49:15","slug":"references","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/eoasquest\/references\/","title":{"rendered":"References"},"content":{"rendered":"

Characteristics of this reference list<\/h2>\n

There are 86 references cited in QuEST documentation, with academic subject coverage and educational contexts summarized as follows:<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Some additional web resources<\/strong> are included below the list<\/a>, including information sources provided by UBC. A few further references used for a poster presented at AGU, 2021, are also included.<\/p>\n

Presentations<\/a> about QuEST work within UBC and at external conferences are listed at the end.<\/p>\n

The reference list<\/h2>\n

Note this reference set is gathered as a Zotero collection owned by F. Jones but visible to public at https:\/\/www.zotero.org\/groups\/4680105\/qes_curriculum\/library<\/a>.<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Abramovich, Sergei, and Arcadii Z. Grinshpan<\/strong>. \u201cTeaching Mathematics to Non-Mathematics Majors Through Applications.\u201d PRIMUS<\/i> 18, no. 5 (September 2008<\/strong>): 411\u201328. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10511970601182772<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  2. Allen, J., S. Kuehn, and E. Creamer.<\/strong> \u201cA Boost for the CURE: Improving Learning Outcomes with Curriculum-Based Undergraduate Research.\u201d GSA Today, 2020<\/strong>. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1130\/GSATG458GW.1<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  3. Ashline, George.<\/strong> \u201cReal-World Examples: Developing a Departmental Alumni Network.\u201d PRIMUS<\/i> 27, no. 6 (July 2017<\/strong>): 598\u2013605. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10511970.2016.1234528<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  4. Atanasov, Risto, Tuval Foguel, and Jeffrey Lawson<\/strong>. \u201cSenior Capstone Seminar: A Comprehensive Learning Experience.\u201d PRIMUS<\/i> 23, no. 4 (March 2013<\/strong>): 392\u2013402. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10511970.2012.748112<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  5. Austin, P. et.al.,<\/strong> “Data Science Curriculum Group 2019 Report and Recommendations”, internal report for the Faculty of Science, UBC, 2019<\/strong>.<\/li>\n
  6. Batchelor, R.L., H. Ali, K.G. Gardner-Vandy, A.U. Gold, J.A. MacKinnon, and P.M. Asher<\/strong> (2021<\/strong>), \u201cReimagining STEM workforce development as a braided river\u201d, Eos, 102,<\/em> 19 April 2021<\/strong>, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1029\/2021EO157277<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  7. Bates, Tony.<\/strong> “Curriculum Design and the Teaching of 21st Century Skills | Tony Bates”, 25 November 2021. <\/strong>https:\/\/www.tonybates.ca\/2021\/11\/25\/curriculum-design-and-the-teaching-of-21st-century-skills\/<\/a>. Accessed October 2023.<\/li>\n
  8. \n
    \n
    Bernard, Rachel E., and Emily H. G. Cooperdock<\/strong>. \u201cNo Progress on Diversity in 40 Years.\u201d Nature Geoscience<\/i> 11, no. 5 (May 2018<\/strong>): 292\u201395. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41561-018-0116-6<\/a>.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n
  9. Blake, Reginald, Janet Liou-Mark, Hamidreza Norouzi, Viviana Vladutescu, Laura Yuen-Lau, and Malika Ikramova.<\/strong> \u201cBridging Nongeoscience Stem Majors to the Geoscience Workforce through a Skills Training and Enrichment Program.\u201d American Meteorological Society<\/i> 98, no. 11 (November 2017<\/strong>). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1175\/BAMS-D-16-0085.1<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  10. Burkholder, E.\u2009W., J.\u2009K. Miles, T.\u2009J. Layden, K.\u2009D. Wang, A.\u2009V. Fritz, and C.\u2009E. Wieman<\/strong>. \u201cTemplate for Teaching and Assessment of Problem Solving in Introductory Physics.\u201d Physical Review Physics Education Research<\/i> 16, no. 1 (April 24, 2020): 010123. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1103\/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.010123<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  11. Capello, M.A., A. Shaughnessy, and E. Caslin.<\/strong> \u201cThe Geophysical Sustainability Atlas: Mapping Geophysics to the UN Sustainable Development Goals.\u201d The Leading Edge<\/i> 40, no. 1 (January 2021<\/strong>): 10\u201324. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1190\/tle40010010.1<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  12. Carey, C.C., R.D. Gougis, J.L. Klug, C.M. O\u2019Reilly, and D.C. Richardson.<\/strong> \u201cA Model for Using Environmental Data-Driven Inquiry and Exploration to Teach Limnology to Undergraduates.\u201d Limnology and Oceanography Bulletin<\/i> 24, no. 2 (2015): 32\u201335. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/lob.10020<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  13. Carter, S.C., E.M. Griffith, T.A. Jorgensen, K.G. Coifman, and W.A. Griffith<\/strong>. \u201cHighlighting Altruism in Geoscience Careers Aligns with Diverse US Student Ideals Better than Emphasizing Working Outdoors.\u201d Communications Earth & Environment 2, no. 1 (October 7, 2021): 1\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s43247-021-00287-4<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  14. Cervato, C. <\/strong>\u201cRecruiting to Geosciences through Campus Partnerships.\u201d GSA Today 31, no. 6, June 2021<\/strong>: 36\u201337. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1130\/GSATG503GW.1.<\/li>\n
  15. Changnon, David<\/strong>. \u201cImproving Outreach in Atmospheric Sciences.\u201d Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society<\/i> 85, no. 4 (April 2004<\/strong>): 601\u20136.<\/li>\n
  16. Chonacky, Norman, and David Winch.<\/strong> \u201cIntegrating Computation into the Undergraduate Curriculum: A Vision and Guidelines for Future Developments.\u201d American Journal of Physics<\/i> 76, no. 4 (April 2008<\/strong>): 327\u201333. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1119\/1.2837811<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  17. Cohen, D.R.<\/strong> \u201cAustralian Geoscience Tertiary Education Profile 2003-2021.\u201d Report to the Australian Geoscience Council, 2022<\/strong>. https:\/\/www.agc.org.au\/resources\/reports\/australian-geoscience-council-report\/<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  18. Comas, X., S. Kruse, G. Grant, B. Hanson, and L. Lyon<\/strong>. \u201cEnvisioning a Near-Surface Geophysics Center for Convergent Science.\u201d Eos<\/em>, April 5, 2023. <\/strong>http:\/\/eos.org\/science-updates\/envisioning-a-near-surface-geophysics-center-for-convergent-science<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  19. Coughlin, Tom.<\/strong> \u201cIEEE Future Of The Workforce Report Shows International Trends And Recommendations.\u201d Forbes, 2022<\/strong>. https:\/\/www.forbes.com\/sites\/tomcoughlin\/2022\/11\/10\/ieee-future-of-the-workforce-report-shows-international-trends-and-recommendations\/<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  20. Coursera.<\/strong> \u201cCoursera Ebook | Advancing Higher Education with Industry Micro-Credentials.\u201d Accessed September 13, 2023. https:\/\/www.coursera.org\/campus\/resources\/ebooks\/industry-micro-credentials<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  21. Cramer, B., D. Peate, and M. Saltzman.<\/strong> \u201cGSA Statement on Diversity and a Challenge to the Society, Geoscience Departments, and the Geoscience Community at Large.\u201d GSA Today 31, no. 1 (January 2021<\/strong>): 34\u201336. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1130\/GSATG472GW.1.<\/li>\n
  22. Crawford, M., and G. Wright.<\/strong> \u201cDelphi Method,\u201d 1\u20136, 2016. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/9781118445112.stat07879<\/a> .<\/li>\n
  23. Dill-McFarland, K.A., S.G. K\u00f6nig, F.Mazel, D.Oliver, L.M. McEwen, K.Y. Hong, and S.J. Hallam.<\/strong> \u201cAn Integrated, Modular Approach to Data Science Education in the Life Sciences.\u201d BioRxiv<\/em>, July 27, 2020<\/strong>, 2020.07.25.218453. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1101\/2020.07.25.218453<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  24. Egger, A.E., Viskupic, K., and Iverson, E.R.<\/strong> (2019<\/strong>). Results of the National Geoscience Faculty Survey (2004-2016)<\/a>. (Acrobat (PDF) 6.1MB Dec12 19). National Association of Geoscience Teachers, Northfield, MN. 82 p.<\/li>\n
  25. Finley, A<\/strong>., \u201cHow College Contributes to Workforce Success.\u201d Association of American Colleges and Universities, 2021<\/strong>. https:\/\/www.aacu.org\/research\/how-college-contributes-to-workforce-success<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  26. Fissel, E, A. Hurtado, and M.G. Strawser.<\/strong> \u201cCommunicating Effectively and Efficiently: A Research Brief That Explores University Faculty Communication Preferences.\u201d The Journal of Faculty Development<\/i> 36, no. 2 (2022<\/strong>): 77\u201379. https:\/\/www.ingentaconnect.com\/content\/magna\/jfd\/2022\/00000036\/00000002\/art00011<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  27. \n
    \n
    Furman, T., and M. Moldwin.<\/strong> “Higher Education During the Pandemic: Truths and Takeaways”. Eos, June 2021<\/strong>. http:\/\/eos.org\/opinions\/higher-education-during-the-pandemic-truths-and-takeaways<\/a>.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n
  28. Gaston, P., G. Schneider, and P. Ewell.<\/strong> \u201cDegree Qualifications Profile.\u201d Degree Qualifications Profile, June 2021. https:\/\/www.learningoutcomesassessment.org\/dqp<\/a>, accessed Nov, 2022.<\/li>\n
  29. Goldberg, David E., and Mark Somerville<\/strong>. \u201cThe Making of A Whole New Engineer: Four Unexpected Lessons for Engineering Educators and Education Researchers.\u201d Journal of Engineering Education<\/i> 104, no. 1 (2015<\/strong>): 2\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jee.20064<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  30. \n
    Guzdial, Mark.<\/strong> “Computing Education as a Foundation for 21st Century Literacy”. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education<\/i>, 502\u20133. SIGCSE \u201919. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2019<\/strong>. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3287324.3290953<\/a>.<\/div>\n<\/li>\n
  31. Hansen, Sarah J.R., Jieling Zhu, Jessica M. Karch, Cristina M. Sorrento, Joseph C. Ulichny, and Laura J. Kaufman.<\/strong> \u2018Bridging the Gap between Instructional and Research Laboratories: Teaching Data Analysis Software Skills through the Manipulation of Original Research Data\u2019. Journal of Chemical Education<\/i> 93, no. 4 (2016<\/strong>): 663\u201368. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1021\/acs.jchemed.5b00710<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  32. Hirst, Andrew, and Veronica Benson.<\/strong> \u2018Advice for Post-COVID Careers\u2019. Physics World<\/i> 34, no. 11 (December 2021<\/strong>): 54\u201355. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1088\/2058-7058\/34\/11\/43<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  33. Holmes, N.\u2009G., Benjamin Keep, and Carl E. Wieman.<\/strong> \u201cDeveloping Scientific Decision Making by Structuring and Supporting Student Agency.\u201d Physical Review Physics Education Research<\/i> 16, no. 1 (February 2020<\/strong>): 010109. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1103\/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.010109<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  34. Jacobs, Christian T., Gerard J. Gorman, Huw E. Rees, and Lorraine E. Craig.<\/strong> “Experiences With Efficient Methodologies for Teaching Computer Programming to Geoscientists”. Journal of Geoscience Education<\/i> 64, no. 3 (August 2016<\/strong>): 183\u201398. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5408\/15-101.1<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  35. Jiracek, George R., W. Scott Baldridge, Shawn Biehler, Lawrence W. Braile, John F. Ferguson, Bernard E. Gilpin, and David L. Alumbaugh.<\/strong> \u201cSAGE\u202f: Learning Geophysics by Immersion.\u201d The Leading Edge<\/i> 19, no. 9 (September 1, 2000): 986\u201390. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1190\/1.1438780<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  36. Johnson, Ashanti, Melanie J. Huggans, David Siegfried, and LaTanya Braxton.<\/strong> “Strategies for Increasing Diversity in the Ocean Science Workforce Through Mentoring”. Oceanography (Washington, D.C.)<\/i> 29, no. 1 (March 2016<\/strong>): 46\u201354. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5670\/oceanog.2016.11<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  37. \n
    \n
    Jones, F., and S. Harris<\/strong> “Benefits and Drawbacks of Using Multiple Instructors to Teach Single Courses”. College Teaching<\/i> 60, no. 4 (October 2012<\/strong>): 132\u201339. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/87567555.2012.654832<\/a>.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n
  38. Jones, F.M., M. Jellinek, M.G. Bostock<\/strong>, “Defining, Teaching and Assessing Program Learning Goals for \u201cScientific Reasoning\u201d, AGU, 2012<\/strong>, https:\/\/ctlt2013.sites.olt.ubc.ca\/files\/2012\/01\/eos.pdf<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  39. Jones, F.<\/strong> \u201cSurvey of Hiring Practices in Geoscience Industries, 2010,\u201d June 2010<\/strong>. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.14288\/1.0052313<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  40. Keane, C., L. Gonzales, and D. Robinson.<\/strong> “Status of Recent Geoscience Graduates 2021”. American Geosciences Institute, 2021<\/strong>. https:\/\/www.americangeosciences.org\/static\/files\/GraduateSurvey2021.pdf<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  41. Keane, C.M., and C.E. Wilson<\/strong>. \u201cThe Mid-21st Century Geophysics Workforce: How Today?S Trends across Geoscience Impact Geophysics Human Resources of the Future.\u201d In SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2018<\/i>, 4829\u201333. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 2018<\/strong>. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1190\/segam2018-2992425.1<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  42. Khotimah, Rita Pramujiyanti, and Masduki Masduki.<\/strong> “Improving Teaching Quality and Problem Solving Ability Through Contextual Teaching and Learning in Differential Equations: A Lesson Study Approach”. JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education)<\/i> 1, no. 1 (January 2016<\/strong>): 1\u201313. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.23917\/jramathedu.v1i1.1791<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  43. Kwok, S<\/strong>. \u201cScience Education in the 21st Century.\u201d Nature Astronomy<\/em> 2, no. 7 (July 2018<\/strong>): 530\u201333. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41550-018-0510-4<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  44. \n
    \n
    Landi, Amanda K., and Kaethe Minden.<\/strong> \u201cMetacognitive Assessments for Undergraduate Mathematics Courses in the Time of COVID-19.\u201d PRIMUS<\/i> 33, no. 5 (May 2023<\/strong>): 555\u201368. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10511970.2022.2106603<\/a>.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n
  45. Legault, J., and B. Howe<\/strong>. \u201cIntroduction to This Special Section: Mining Geophysics.\u201d The Leading Edge<\/em> 40, no. 2 (2021<\/strong>): 88\u201388. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1190\/tle40020088.1<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  46. Lewis, Drew, and Julie Estis.<\/strong> “Improving Mathematics Content Mastery and Enhancing Flexible Problem Solving through Team-Based Inquiry Learning”. Teaching and Learning Inquiry<\/i> 8, no. 2 (6 October 2020<\/strong>): `165-183. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.20343\/teachlearninqu.8.2.11<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  47. \n
    Liemohn, Michael W.<\/strong> \u201cFoundations in Data Analysis for Undergraduate STEM Students.\u201d Eos, October, 2023<\/strong>. http:\/\/eos.org\/editors-vox\/foundations-in-data-analysis-for-undergraduate-stem-students<\/a>.<\/div>\n<\/li>\n
  48. Lovett, Marsh C., Michael W. Bridges, Michele DiPietro, Susan A. Ambrose, and Marie K. Norman.<\/strong> How Learning Works: Eight Research-Based Principles for Smart Teaching, 2nd Edition<\/i>. Jossy-Bass, 2023.<\/li>\n
  49. Lyon, E., R.L. Freeman, J. Bathon, A. Fryar, M. McGlue, A.M. Erhardt, A. Rosen, S. Sampson, A. Nelson, and J. Parsons.<\/strong> \u201cAttitudinal Impediments to Geology Major Recruitment among Ninth Graders at a STEM High School.\u201d Journal of Geoscience Education<\/em> 68, no. 3 (2020<\/strong>): 237\u201353. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10899995.2019.1700593<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  50. Macdonald, R. H, and C. M. Bailey.<\/strong> \u201cIntegrating the Teaching of Quantitative Skills across the Geology Curriculum in a Department.\u201d Journal of Geoscience Education<\/i> 48, no. 4 (2000<\/strong>): 482\u201386.<\/li>\n
  51. Marbach-Ad, G., V. Briken, K. Frauwirth, L. Y Gao, S. W Hutcheson, S. W Joseph, D. Mosser, et al.<\/strong> \u201cA Faculty Team Works to Create Content Linkages among Various Courses to Increase Meaningful Learning of Targeted Concepts of Microbiology.\u201d CBE-Life Sciences Education<\/i> 6, no. 2 (2007<\/strong>): 155.<\/li>\n
  52. McFadden, R.R., K. Viskupic, and A.E. Egger.<\/strong> \u201cFaculty Self-Reported Use of Quantitative and Data Analysis Skills in Undergraduate Geoscience Courses.\u201d Journal of Geoscience Education 69, no. 4 (2021<\/strong>): 373\u201386. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10899995.2019.1700595<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  53. McGovern, A., and J. Allen.<\/strong> \u201cTraining the Next Generation of Physical Data Scientists.\u201d Eos, October 6, 2021<\/strong>. http:\/\/eos.org\/opinions\/training-the-next-generation-of-physical-data-scientists<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  54. Mcleod, P., and Y. Steinert<\/strong>. \u201cTwelve Tips for Curriculum Renewal.\u201d Medical Teacher<\/i> 37, no. 3 (March 4, 2015): 232\u201338. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3109\/0142159X.2014.932898<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  55. Modo, Michel, and Ian Kinchin.<\/strong> \u201cA Conceptual Framework for Interdisciplinary Curriculum Design: A Case Study in Neuroscience.\u201d Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education<\/i> 10, no. 1 (October 2011<\/strong>): A71\u201379.<\/li>\n
  56. Mosher, S., and C. Keane<\/strong>. \u201cVision and Change in the Geosciences: The Future of Undergraduate Geoscience Education.\u201d American Geosciences Institute<\/em>, (2021<\/strong>). https:\/\/www.americangeosciences.org\/change\/print-edition\/<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  57. National Science Board.<\/strong> \u201cThe State of U.S. Science and Engineering 2022 | NSF – National Science Foundation,\u201d 2022<\/strong>. https:\/\/ncses.nsf.gov\/pubs\/nsb20221\/u-s-and-global-stem-education-and-labor-force<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  58. Nichol, Craig,.<\/strong> \u201cImproving the Relationships between Canadian Earth Science Departments and Canadian Professional Geoscience Regulators.\u201d CCCESD, 2022<\/strong>. https:\/\/cccesd.acadiau.ca\/2022_Nichol.pdf<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  59. Nichol, C.,<\/strong> Strategies to Advance the Relationships between Earth Science Departments and the Regulators of Professional Geoscience\u00a0: Supporting Earth Science Students to Professional Geoscience Registration, 2023.<\/strong> doi:http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.14288\/1.0435176<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  60. Ng, G<\/strong>., \u201c5 Ways to Guide Your Students Toward Career Success.\u201d Harvard Business Publishing, Education, August 10, 2023<\/strong>. Long link at hbsp.harvard.edu<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  61. Oremland, Lucy S., and Csilla Szabo.<\/strong> \u201cPreparing Interdisciplinary Problem Solvers: A Project-Based Course Series for the Mathematical\/Interdisciplinary Contests in Modeling.\u201d PRIMUS<\/i> 0, no. 0, 2021<\/strong>: 1\u201315. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10511970.2021.1962460<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  62. Pautz, M.C., and M.A. Diede.<\/strong> \u201c(Re)Engaging with Faculty Requires Consideration of Faculty Motivation: Insights from a Faculty Motivation Survey.\u201d The Journal of Faculty Development<\/i> 36, no. 3 (2022<\/strong>): 77\u201381. https:\/\/www.ingentaconnect.com\/content\/magna\/jfd\/2022\/00000036\/00000003\/art00010<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  63. Rohde Poole, S. B.<\/strong> \u201cDesigning and Teaching an Undergraduate Mathematical Modeling Course for Mathematics Majors and Minors.\u201d PRIMUS<\/i> 32, no. 7 (August 9, 2022): 764\u201384. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10511970.2021.1931995<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  64. Rozhenkova, V., L. Snow, B. Sato, S. Lo, and N. Buswell<\/strong>. \u201cLimited or Complete? Teaching and Learning Conceptions and Instructional Environments Fostered by STEM Teaching versus Research Faculty.\u201d International Journal of STEM Education<\/i> 10 (August 5, 2023<\/strong>). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s40594-023-00440-9<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  65. Ruder, Suzanne M., and Courtney Stanford.<\/strong> “Training Undergraduate Teaching Assistants to Facilitate and Assess Process Skills in Large Enrollment Courses”. Chemical Education<\/i> 97, no. 10 (October 2020<\/strong>): 3521\u201329. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1021\/acs.jchemed.9b00912<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  66. S&P Global Market<\/strong>. “Report: World Exploration Trends 2023”, 2023<\/strong>. https:\/\/pages.marketintelligence.spglobal.com\/world-exploration-trends-2023-report-EMC.html<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  67. Sampson, J.P., J.G. Lenz, R.C. Reardon, and G.W. Peterson<\/strong>. \u201cA Cognitive Information Processing Approach to Employment Problem Solving and Decision Making.\u201d The Career Development Quarterly<\/i> 48, no. 1 (September 1999): 3\u201318. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/j.2161-0045.1999.tb00271.x<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  68. Sarkar, Mahbub, Tina Overton, Christopher Thompson, and Gerry Rayner<\/strong>. \u201cGraduate Employability: Views of Recent Science Graduates and Employers.\u201d International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education<\/i> 24, no. 3<\/a> (January 2016<\/strong>): 31\u201348.<\/li>\n
  69. Saunders, Venetia, and Katherine Zuzel.<\/strong> \u201cEvaluating Employability Skills: Employer and Student Perceptions.\u201d Bioscience Education E-Journal<\/i> 15, no. 1 (June 2010<\/strong>): 1\u201315. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3108\/beej.15.2<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  70. \n
    \n
    Sinha, Saurabh, Liz Burd, and Jaco Du Preez.<\/strong> \u201cHow ChatGPT Could Revolutionize Academia – IEEE Spectrum,\u201d February 2023.<\/strong> https:\/\/spectrum.ieee.org\/how-chatgpt-could-revolutionize-academia<\/a>.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n
  71. Shabram, Patrick.<\/strong> \u201cOffering Career-Focused Courses to Increase Geoscience Participation: Lessons from Five Years of Experience.\u201d In the Trenches – April 2020<\/strong>. https:\/\/nagt.org\/nagt\/publications\/trenches\/v10-n2\/offering_career_focused_courses.html<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  72. Shadle, Susan E., Anthony Marker, and Brittnee Earl.<\/strong> \u201cFaculty Drivers and Barriers: Laying the Groundwork for Undergraduate STEM Education Reform in Academic Departments.\u201d International Journal of STEM Education<\/i> 4, no. 1 (April 2017<\/strong>). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s40594-017-0062-7<\/a> (open access).<\/li>\n
  73. Shafer, G., K. Viskupic, and A. Egger<\/strong>. \u201cAnalysis of Skills Sought by Employers of Bachelors-Level Geoscientists.\u201d GSA Today 32, no. 2 (2022<\/strong>): 34\u201335. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1130\/GSATG510GW.1<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  74. Shafer, G., K. Viskupic, and A. Egger.<\/strong> \u201cCritical Workforce Skills for Bachelor-Level Geoscientists: An Analysis of Geoscience Job Advertisements.\u201d Geosphere<\/i> 19 (February 9, 2023<\/strong>). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1130\/GES02581.1<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  75. Shafer, G., K. Viskupic, and A. Egger.<\/strong> \u201cAssessing How Inclusive Geoscience Job Advertisements Are to Persons with Disabilities”, Poster at EER<\/a>, July 2023<\/strong>.<\/li>\n
  76. Summa, L., C. Keane, and S. Mosher<\/strong>. \u201cMeeting Changing Workforce Needs in Geoscience with New Thinking about Undergraduate Education.\u201d GSA Today<\/em>, September 1, 2017<\/strong>, 58\u201359. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1130\/GSATG342GW.1<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  77. US Census Bureau<\/strong>. \u201cFrom College to Jobs: Pathways in STEM.\u201d Census.gov, May 2021<\/strong>. https:\/\/www.census.gov\/library\/visualizations\/interactive\/from-college-to-jobs-stem.html<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  78. Usher, Alex.<\/strong> \u201cAnticipating Market Demand.\u201d HESA<\/i> (blog), March 28, 2022<\/strong>. https:\/\/higheredstrategy.com\/anticipating-market-demand\/<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  79. Usher, Alex.<\/strong> “Degrees That Matter”. HESA<\/i> (blog), 26 January 2018<\/strong>. https:\/\/higheredstrategy.com\/degrees-that-matter\/<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  80. Viskupic, K., A.E. Egger, R.R. McFadden, and M.D. Schmitz<\/strong>. \u201cComparing Desired Workforce Skills and Reported Teaching Practices to Model Students\u2019 Experiences in Undergraduate Geoscience Programs.\u201d Journal of Geoscience Education 69, no. 1 (2021<\/strong>): 27\u201342. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10899995.2020.1779568<\/a>. See Figure 1 adapted<\/a> for QuEST.<\/li>\n
  81. Viskupic, K., J.A. Wenner, C.O. Harrigan, and G. Shafer<\/strong>. \u201cA Mixed Methods Study of the Challenges for Geoscience Majors in Identifying Potential Careers and the Benefits of a Career Awareness and Planning Course.\u201d Journal of Geoscience Education<\/i> 0, no. 0 (December 6, 2022<\/strong>): 1\u201315. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10899995.2022.2147383<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  82. \n
    \n
    Wieman, Carl.<\/strong> \u201cImproving How Universities Teach Science: Lessons from the Science Education Initiative.\u201d Harvard University Press, 2017. <\/strong>https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4159\/9780674978911<\/a>.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n
  83. Wieman, C. and S. Gilbert<\/strong>. “The Teaching Practices Inventory: A New Tool for Characterizing College and University Teaching in Mathematics and Science”. Edited by Erin Dolan. CBE\u2014Life Sciences Education<\/i> 13, no. 3 (September 2014<\/strong>): 552\u201369. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1187\/cbe.14-02-0023<\/a>. See also https:\/\/cwsei.ubc.ca\/resources\/tools\/tpi<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  84. Wikipedia on Grounded theory<\/a> <\/strong>\u2013 and associated references.<\/li>\n
  85. Wilson, Carolyn, Christopher Keane, and Heather Houlton.<\/strong> \u201cUnderstanding Geoscience Student Transitions between the Postsecondary Degree and Entry into the Geoscience Workforce.\u201d Limnology and Oceanography Bulletin<\/i> 23, no. 2 (May 2014<\/strong>): 30\u201333. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/lob.201423230<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  86. Wilson, A., A. Onwuegbuzie, and LaS. Manning<\/strong> \u201cUsing Paired Depth Interviews to Collect Qualitative Data.\u201d The Qualitative Report 21, no. 9 (Sept. 2016): 1549\u201373. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.46743\/2160-3715\/2016.2166<\/a> .<\/li>\n
  87. Winkelmes, M.,<\/strong> \u201cIntroduction to Transparency in Learning and Teaching.\u201d Perspectives In Learning<\/i> 20, no. 1 (February 27, 2023<\/strong>). https:\/\/csuepress.columbusstate.edu\/pil\/vol20\/iss1\/2<\/a>.<\/li>\n
  88. Yasar, Osman, and Rubin H. Landau<\/strong>. \u201cElements of Computational Science and Engineering Education.\u201d SIAM Review<\/i> 45, no. 4 (January 2003<\/strong>): 787\u2013805. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1137\/S0036144502408075<\/a>.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Websites and resources<\/h3>\n
      \n
    1. \u201cCurated Collection of Jupyter\/IPython Notebooks<\/strong>,\u201d n.d. https:\/\/github.com\/jupyter\/jupyter\/wiki<\/a>.<\/li>\n
    2. \u201cEDDIE Webinars<\/strong> –\u00a0 Teaching with Large Datasets.\u201d Accessed August 18, 2022. https:\/\/serc.carleton.edu\/eddie\/events\/webinars\/index.html<\/a>.<\/li>\n
    3. \u201cKey Capabilities in Data Science | UBC Extended Learning (ExL)<\/strong>.\u201d Accessed October 26, 2023. https:\/\/extendedlearning.ubc.ca\/programs\/key-capabilities-data-science<\/a>.<\/li>\n
    4. \u201cSAGE<\/strong> – Home Page (Summer of Applied Geophysical Experience).\u201d Accessed May 30, 2022. https:\/\/www.summerofappliedgeophysicalexperience.org\/<\/a>.<\/li>\n
    5. SERC Site Guides<\/strong>. \u201cQuantitative Activities at SERC.\u201d Accessed November 22, 2022. https:\/\/serc.carleton.edu\/serc\/site_guides\/quant_activities.html<\/a>.<\/li>\n
    6. EER 2023<\/strong> (Earth Educator’s Rendezvous workshop\/meeting): a 3-morning workshop<\/strong> “How is your Program Helping Students Prepare for the Jobs they Want?<\/a>“. Their program page<\/a> includes links to workshop materials and outcomes, plus several excellent career-preparation related references and resources listed at the end of that page.<\/li>\n
    7. EER 2023<\/strong>: a 2-morning workshop<\/strong> “Teaching Quantitative Reasoning with Real Data – The EDDIE Way!<\/a>“. Their program page<\/a> includes links to workshop materials and outcomes.<\/li>\n
    8. EER 2023<\/strong>: A 2.5 hr session<\/strong> “Creating an Online Learning Environment about Geoscience Careers and Licensure<\/a>“, Craig Nichole, UBC-OK.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      UBC sources<\/h2>\n