{"id":484,"date":"2005-05-22T13:23:22","date_gmt":"2005-05-22T21:23:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/migrator.rab.olt.ubc.ca\/eportfolios\/2005\/05\/article-reflection-supporting-tools\/"},"modified":"2005-05-22T13:23:22","modified_gmt":"2005-05-22T21:23:22","slug":"article-reflection-supporting-tools","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/eportfolios\/2005\/05\/article-reflection-supporting-tools\/","title":{"rendered":"Article:  Reflection Supporting Tools"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I came across an article in the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.itdl.org\/index.htm\" target=\"new\">International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning<\/a> that I thought members of our e-portfolio community might find useful.<\/p>\n<p>The article, by Seung-hee Lee (Indiana University), is <a href=\"http:\/\/www.itdl.org\/Journal\/Mar_05\/article05.htm\" target=\"new\" title=\"Link to Article\">Design and Analysis of Reflection-Supporting Tools in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>One thing I like about this paper is that argues that reflection is not a solitary activity.  To me, the implication of this from a software side is that both &#8220;individual&#8221; and collaborative\/social tools should be included in an e-portfolio system in order to provide a more meaningful experience for e-portfolio owners, and enable deeper reflection.<\/p>\n<p>My personal experience with this harkens back to the launch of our e-portfolio community of practice in early 2003.  I think that was the first time I became conscious of the social aspect of reflection. The activities that Barbara Cambridge engaged us in &#8211; cubing, dialogue journaling &#8211; underscored the very notion that creating an e-portfolio is a social activity.  We learn and hone our understanding of our learning and ourselves by interacting with others.<\/p>\n<p><strong>So, &#8230; about the article:<\/strong><br \/>\nThis short article provides a concise overview, theoretical foundation and design considerations for online environments that support reflection, particularly collaborative reflection.  <a href=\"http:\/\/www.itdl.org\/Journal\/Mar_05\/article05_files\/image002.gif\" target=\"new\">Figure 1<\/a> is a good snapshot of the concepts covered; it links the design principles (facilitating social awareness, thinking visualization, learner discourse, and group meta-cognition) to the components of an environment that support collaborative reflection.  The four components include:<\/p>\n<p> &#8211; Group workplace<br \/>\n &#8211; Reflection journal<br \/>\n &#8211; Thinking sharing board<br \/>\n &#8211; Reflective scaffolding<\/p>\n<p>The research carried out by the author spanned three universities.  Learners were placed into three groups:  1) learners that used collaborative reflection-supporting tools; 2) learners that used individual reflection-supporting tools; and 3) learners that used no reflection support.<\/p>\n<p>The author concludes:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><em>&#8220;&#8230;the findings show that reflection-supporting tools have positive impacts on the group performance as well as the perception of learners on collaborative learning. Also, the reflection-supporting tools in CSCL environments were effective and user friendly for group learning.&#8221;<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>The observations associated with each of the components provide more context; I believe that members of our community of practice will find pearls of wisdom for their specific contexts and purposes.<\/p>\n<p><b>What was my pearl?<\/b><br \/>\nI took to heart the observations related to the comfort level of learners with the tools.  From the preface to the discussion of the components:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><em>&#8220;At the beginning, learners with little online group learning opportunities seemed to have psychological and cognitive overload to collaborating online, but they perceived online learning positively as time gradually went by.&#8221; <\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>A few thoughts. ..<\/p>\n<p>Students are adjusting to number of elements when they go online, with changes in environment and expectations related to (increased) personal responsibility high on the list.<\/p>\n<p>Collaboration  in and of itself is most likely unfamiliar to many, and adding a number of new tools that support activities carried out in new ways&#8230;.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s not surprising that is daunting!<\/p>\n<p>The comforting part is the part of the quote that says..<\/p>\n<p><em>&#8220;..as time gradually went by&#8221;.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Students did and do adjust, if they are supported through that process, particularly if the instructor provides concrete linkages between the activities and the students&#8217; success in the course.<\/p>\n<p>This requires that we make conscious decisions about <strong><em>when<\/em><\/strong> and <strong><em>why<\/em><\/strong> we employ tools, and ensure that they support the objectives of the course.<\/p>\n<p>To me this means a need to think about tools within the context of a program &#8211; not just a course (module).<\/p>\n<p>This leads me to a question about the role of curriculum committees and learning technology decisions.  For online programs, I believe the technology decisions are integrated within the discussions.  What about &#8220;traditional&#8221; curriculum committees?  Do they also discuss the role of learning technology in the overall curriculum?  Is &#8220;learner support&#8221; a component of this?<\/p>\n<p>Be interesting to know more about that &#8212; sounds like something I need to investigate!<\/p>\n<p>Id love to hear from our Community of Practice members on this!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I came across an article in the International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning that I thought members of our e-portfolio community might find useful. The article, by Seung-hee Lee (Indiana University), is Design and Analysis of Reflection-Supporting Tools in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. One thing I like about this paper is that argues that [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":246,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[155],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-484","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/eportfolios\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/484","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/eportfolios\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/eportfolios\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/eportfolios\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/246"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/eportfolios\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=484"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/eportfolios\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/484\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/eportfolios\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=484"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/eportfolios\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=484"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/eportfolios\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=484"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}