Exploring MyWorld GIS

Using the MyWorld GIS  software took some curiosity and exploration before I figured out how to use the program successfully. Once I started experience the activities I could see how using this program could easily apply constructivist learning strategies. This type of learning is defined as “the process of constructing new knowledge structures and forging new connections between knowledge structures in an interconnected web” (Edelson, 2001). The initial activity of loading maps and layer different information overtop of them quickly connected to my understanding and knowledge of using image-editing software like Photoshop. I also needed to apply my knowledge of geography.

I decided to apply the activities I completed in MyWorld GIS by apply the LfU model used in the research paper. (Edelson, 2001)

Motivate  Experience demandExperience curiosity MyWorld GIS creates a demand for GIS knowledge by ensuring that learners apply GIS activities and calculations to complete them successfully.Curiosity is experienced through the gap in knowledge of what information the software can calculate and what geographic information it can reveal to the user.
Construct  ObserveReceive communication Observing the relationships between known cities and potentially unknown geographic information.In this case the activities did not provide me with information from other people but information was provided through the use of the software and is shared and communicated through the discussion forum.
Refine ApplyReflect  The walkthrough in Module B of this course was helpful in me acquiring the skills to do my own queries and calculations within MyWorld GIS.By discussing my experience I have been able to make an in-depth reflection on the learning activities. 

 

I performed 2 separate calculations using MyWorld GIS. The first was regarding World rivers near Detroit MI. The other was regarding World Lakes near Detroit MI. The activities were a great inquiry based learning experience. I was able to add new map layers and see the information visually and then make the calculations and collect the data. The information I collected is posted below.

Length (computed) Name System Distance from Detroit (m)

1787515.81

Ohio Mississippi

284718.4688

59414.30727

St. Claire St. Lawrence

39282.62891

46454.08397

Niagara St. Lawrence

335750.4688

 

Area (computed) Perimeter (computed) Name Surface Elevation Depth Distance to Detroit (meters)

83276218103

2427523.417

Lake Superior

600

1333

463340.5938

61302572423

2368514.352

Lake Huron

577

750

87852.89063

57859636636

1873046.186

Lake Michigan

577

923

351254.375

19653793474

1067169.617

Lake Ontario

245

802

287929.5625

25981121995

1074703.211

Lake Erie

570

210

8468.75

1191064137

170747.5163

Lake St. Claire

26

8117.553223

 

References:

Edelson, D.C. (2001). Learning-for-use: A framework for the design of technology-supported inquiry activities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,38(3), 355-385.

Stylinski, C. & Smith, D. (2006, August). Connecting classrooms to real-world GIS-based watershed investigations. Paper presented at the ESRI Education User Conference, San Diego, CA.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *