Moving Forward …

This week marks the end of my ETEC 533 journey. I went into the course hoping I would find alternatives and resources for teaching math and science to upper elementary students that would improve my practice. Technology makes a regular appearance in my class and by and large I know my students are exposed to  more than most, but I also know there are probably better ways of carrying this out. Actually, there are times when I knew there had to be, especially in the areas of math and science.

Although intense and daunting at times, I have relished the activities and readings I`ve been exposed to in the last three months. This course made me think. It made me analyze, no I think scrutinize would be a better descriptor, my own practice like I never have before. There have been great resources along the way that I have collected and will share with students, but the greatest growth and learning has come from the pedagogical approaches that I have been introduced to and my investigation around how these currently fit with my practice and how they can be interwoven into my future teaching.

I came looking for resources and activities. I am leaving with a stronger sense of pedagogy and who I want to be as a teacher. It’s the latter that will affect the most change and afford more opportunities to use technology, be it new or established resources, to create more authentic and engaging learning opportunities.

From a student’s perspective, I want each of them to be able to:

  • be engaged in their learning
  • develop useful knowledge they can access in future contexts
  • experience authenticity within a learning environment
  • have opportunities to make their thinking visible and see the thinking of others as well
  • socially construct knowledge and build collective understanding
  • share and learn from different perspectives
  • participate in generative rather than passive activities
  • aggregate data and information to see the strength in collective and collaborative learning
  • revise, modify, and apply feedback to continue to refine their understanding and conceptualization

As a teacher, I am more aware of how I can make all of the above happen and how to use technology to enhance the learning experience, demonstrate phenomena that students do not have access to, and carve new paths for understanding concepts individually and collectively. Through this course I have learned the value of:

  • abductive reasoning
  • mental models
  • information visualization
  • embracing coupling: informatic participation through technology overlapping in the same space  normal as traditional classroom participation
  • pedagogically developed social practices to enrich virtual and ‘real’ learning communities
  • networked communities and networked learning
  • inquiry-based learning through the T-GEM and Learning for Use frameworks and how this fits into my practice
  • How People Learn and how the principles of a knowledge, learner, assessment, and community-centered classroom can become cornerstones in the development and sustainability of a culture of learning in my classroom.

Creating the learning environment I want for my students starts with the pedagogical foundation I choose to lay. Pedagogy is never too far from most teachers’ thoughts. But until now, I didn’t fully realize I wasn’t tapping into my own theotetical base as much as I needed to. It’s one thing to understand and contemplate pedagogy in general. It’s another to understand and contemplate it as it applies to your personal practice. This requires a depth of reflection and analysis that prompts you to assess if your ideology matches your actions. Hopefully, they are one in the same. If not, like me, you have some work to do.

For a more detailed synthesis of my learning in ETEC 533, please visit the e-Folio Analysis page.

image: “The real problem is not adding technology to the current organization of the classroom, but changing the culture of teaching and learning” by langwitches released under a CC Attribution – Noncommercial – Share Alike license

Defining Technology

What is technology? For a word that is ubiquitously used, within formal and informal educational settings, to describe so much in our digital world, it makes me wonder to what extent people actually stop and contemplate what it means to them.

As eluded to by Muffoletto (1994), prevailing assumptions tend to categorize technology as “gadgets, instruments, machines, and devices” that can offer some form of educational cure to what ails the disenfranchised learner. Treating technology as an appendage or accessory to learning further entrenches it as a separate entity endorsing the need to teach media skills in isolation from other subjects in school, which is what Dede (Kozma, 2003) and Trotter (1998) caution against.

I believe technology is derived from innovation. It is engineered to fulfill perceived human need because it’s in our nature to strive for better, faster means of accomplishing a greater product; sometimes to streamline a process, while other times at the expense of it. Technological advances and innovative practices have allowed humans to expand their resources as part of a larger process akin to the evolutionary ecology theory of niche construction – a fitting analogy considering humans have done more to alter their environment than any other living creature; therefore, the definition of technology put forth by Roblyer (2004) resonates with me:

Technology is us – our tools, our methods, and our own creative attempts to solve problems in our environment

Building on this premise, technology then also embodies “a way of acting”, as Muffoletto (1994) describes, because its effective use is also characterized by how well educators are able to harness its potential to improve pedagogy, enrich the learning experience for students, and build connections that extend beyond the walls of the classroom, much in the same way Dede and Trotter emphasize technology in Kozma (2003). It is imperative that educational technology is defined with reference to the process it enables a teacher to enhance, rather than limit its view based on the product it helps to accomplish. When “students can learn with [technology] rather than from technology” (Jonassen, 2000) it sets the stage for meaningful learning and thinking whereby students use the technology to create their own meaning making, which helps them develop a clearer path of understanding.

image: Colored Plate – Fractal Mosaic by qthomasbower released under a CC Attribution – Share Alike license