Consolidation Reflection

Coming into the course, I was rather excited to learn more about incorporating  aspects of DIY ethos and maker mentality into the education and pedagogy, as I felt like the theoretical pedagogy was what I lacked in my current arsenal of tools.

The Provocations and Maker Challenges were great opportunities to think about the application of the theories we have learned in class. It was the perfect time and place for me to brainstorm the ways I can incorporate my personal interests with creating meaningful activities for others to think more deeply about topics relating to EDIDA frameworks and Liberatory Design Thinking, grounding the theoretical concepts and rendering it more tangible and meaningful.

One example of this was reflecting on my visit to Our Community Bikes, and later on, exploring the intersection of identity, accessibility and community building through the Critical Learning Task in conjunction with the Anti-racism Speaker Series podcast. This personal connection also allowed me to embed lived experiences into the narrative, further demonstrating how makerspaces can serve as platforms for storytelling and advocacy.

With accessibility and inclusivity at its core, this course also challenged me to think more thoughtfully about the utilization of technology and creating multiple points of entry for participation. On the no-tech side of things, using recycled fabric to create a quilt, or magazines and scrap paper to create a collage zine, this made me reflect on the the value of resourcefulness in inclusive makerspace to democratize making. On the high-tech side of things, the incorporation of AR/VR elements created opportunities for engagement in digital spaces, which made me reflect on the module of multimedia and multiliteracies, which was an opportunity to consider the ways how technology can enhance access and interaction without overshadowing the personal, hands-on aspects of making.

Constructivist theories, which emphasize learning through experiences, deeply resonated with me in this class, especially when it came to sharing our own artefacts with each other on the discussion boards and providing feedback to each other. I learned a lot about how each of my colleagues implement their maker mentality in their personal and professional contexts, and getting to know one another through this mixing and remixing of ideas was rather fun and insightful! This reciprocal exchange highlighted the power of collective making, and underscores how diverse perspectives can enrich meaning-making, moving beyond individual experiences to create shared understanding.

Along those same lines, our instructor, Keri, provided such detailed feedback throughout the semester, her encouragement and guidance affirmed the effort I put into integrating personal experiences, scholarly frameworks and hands-on practice. This reinforced my confidence in using storytelling and personal insights to make theoretical concepts more accessible and actionable. Keri does not forget to push us further to think about how our work connects with the critical theory, and invites us to refine our work iteratively throughout the course, metaphysically embodying the Liberatory Design Principles that we have learned! Thank you again for your thoughtful guidance through this course, not only affirming my progress throughout this program, but also providing clear pathways for improvement and growth. I look forwards to applying these insights to my future work, and continuing to bridge personal resonance with critical engagement.

Though most of the readings are centered around Makerspaces, I think the biggest paradigm shift for me was requiring us to expand our ideas of what “making” and “makerspaces” can look like — a walk in the park, a craft circle amongst friends, a repair café at the community center, a workshop at school — can all be sites of making and creating. This shift of perspective has made me realize how embedded in “making” I already am, and realizing that has only expanded my ways of participation! These moments reinforced the idea that makerspaces are not confined to workshops or classrooms, they’re embedded in daily life!

This course expanded my understanding of makerspaces as dynamic, inclusive spaces rooted in both theory and personal experience. By embracing the maker mindset in everyday life and projects, I’ve learned to see making as a form of storytelling, advocacy, and connection. Moving forward, I am excited to apply these insights to help facilitate and make spaces that honor diverse voices and foster meaningful engagement.

Provocation #4: Developing Brave Spaces — Fostering Environments for Critical Thinking, Discomfort and Growth

Find the brief to the provocation here: Developing Brave Spaces — Fostering Environments for Critical Thinking, Discomfort and Growth by Curtis Bourassa


Safe Space vs. Brave Space

Safe spaces and brave spaces have often been discussed in the context of creating more inclusive environments for community-building. While both ideas foster understanding and growth, they diverge in their approach to discomfort, accountability and conflict resolution.

Safe spaces often prioritize emotional safety, support and inclusivity, as they were originally created by marginalized groups for marginalized groups. Often they are non-confrontational, providing emotional validation and affirmation, with guidelines often focused on minimizing harm or offensive behavior, language, and ideas.

However, safe spaces can often create echo chambers or discourage confrontation of biases, limiting open dialogue or critical engagement with uncomfortable truths.

 

From the above Youtube video, Jama emphasizes that “it is a dangerous practice if safe spaces are all that we use”, as it forecloses the opportunity for change, does nothing to address structural issues that exist, and can often help reinforce and maintain the status quo.

On the other hand, brave spaces emphasizes embracing discomfort as a key to growth and understanding, and “calling in” –rather than “calling out”– those with different viewpoints to engage in conversation from a perspective of curiosity rather than assumptions or defensiveness.

“The mark of an educated mind is to entertain a thought without accepting it, listen to each other even if we disagree or have different opinions, without it being a threat on our identity”
— Carol Cabrera in  “From Safe Spaces to Brave Spaces”

Components for Developing a Braver Space

Based on the provided resources, I think some core characteristics and guidelines include:

    • Authenticity, Vulnerability and Empathy
    • Discomfort: normalize discomfort, especially when moving through conflict
    • Growth Mindset: being open to having your mind changed
    • Radical Candor: being able to challenge ideas while being personable
    • Clear Guidelines and Skillful Facilitation

Brave Spaces in the Workplace

Below are reflections based on my current workplace and how it aligns with the characteristics of brave spaces, and some potential solutions to foster a braver space.

There seems to be a divide between the faculty members and union staff members, combined with office politics, there seems to be an unbalance of power dynamics, which may prevent more open-dialogue or equitable collaboration, leading to disengagement or trust from team members.

There seems to be a prioritization of experience over innovation where younger or less experienced voices may feel undervalued or dismissed, creating challenges between team members when it comes to collaboration on problem-solving.

Sometimes the team leader’s lack of approachability inhibits honest communication between team members, and there may be hesitation to express concerns leading to hierarchical culture that stifles feedback and transparency.

I think one big potential solution to foster a braver space is creating more time and space for team-building events or internal diversity, equity and inclusion workshops, which will create the opportunity for reducing hierarchical divides, fostering a more cohesive team dynamic, further promoting an office culture where both experiences and fresh perspectives can be seen as assets, and encourage more constructive dialogue where team members can voice concerns, suggest changes or address workplace dynamics in a safer moderated environment.

Task #6: Examination and Anti-racism Speaker Series Alignment Through Making — Pedal Perspectives, Navigating Bike Culture Through Gender, Race and Justice

Brief

The purpose of the task is to critically examine the role of equity, diversity and inclusion within the context of makerspaces, while incorporating decolonization and anti-racism frameworks through the examination of the content in MET’s Anti-Racism Speaker Series. Design a maker challenge or provocation that fosters an environment of equal participation, cultural understanding, and social justice within the makerspace community.

Choose one Anti-racism Speakers Series presentation or podcast to frame the challenge/provocation. Make note of key ideas, theories and research presented in the series. This challenge/provocation should actively promote the participation of individuals from diverse backgrounds, including those historically marginalized and under-represented in the field. Integrate cultural sensitivity and awareness into the design process, ensuring the activity is respectful, accommodating, and accessible to all participants. Use the following templates to design the challenge/provocation.

Inclusive Maker Challenge Template

Inclusive Provocation Template


Find the full Word document here:

Pedal Perspectives – Navigating Bike Culture Through Gender, Race, and Justice

Overview of Provocation

This provocation is designed to encourage students to explore the local bike scene and explore how community, identity and inclusivity intersect in cycling culture.

In Pedal Perspectives, students are encouraged to read some bike zines, visit their local bike shops, meet local riders and perhaps join a biking event, and consider the ways that these spaces are — or are not — accessible and welcoming. How do gender, race and identity shape our experiences in these spaces?

While cycling has surged in popularity as a mode of transport, fitness and community engagement, scholarly research on bike culture remains scarce. Traditional academic circles often overlook the nuanced, lived experiences of cyclists, especially those from marginalized groups.

In conjunction with the Anti-Racism Speakers Series podcast Pervasive Racism and the 2SLGBTQIA+ Community, guest speakers Alex DeForge and Meera Dhebar talk about the lack of meaningful representation, the impact of stereotypes, and need for more intentional and inclusive effort to reflect diverse identities. Both speakers emphasize that critical literacy is the key to empower individuals, and to understand the diversity and depth of the bike community, we need to explore beyond mainstream publications and delve into more underground and personal spaces – like zines.

“The history of lack of women, LGBTQIA+, and BIPOC representation in cycling reveals their marginalization and exclusion, especially in cycling media and sport. And it speaks to a bigger cultural issue of how marginalized groups are continually ignored and misrepresented. We cannot shy away from telling our stories in cycling just because it doesn’t suit the narrative the cycling industry sells.” (Cyclista Zine, 2019)

Zines are booklets (like magazines) that are used to share information, knowledge or experiences with others. They are often made with pen, paper, and collage techniques. They can also be made on computers using digital publishing software.

These DIY publications offer a more authentic look at the voices, struggles and triumphs within biking subcultures, often addressing topics such as gender identity, race, accessibility and social justice that are otherwise absent in academic discourse. By engaging with zines, we can gain more personal and grassroots perspectives that shape biking culture, and illuminate the vital, under-represented voices that mainstream studies miss.

Through guided reflections and interactive exploration, and creating your own zine, this project encourages students to investigate how their own backgrounds and identities relate to the biking community, in hopes to start a conversation about inclusivity, equity and what it means to belong and participate in a community.

Materials and Resources Required

    • Device (computer, tablet, phone) to take notes or document reflections
    • Pencil, pens, paper, magazines, flyers, art/craft supplies etc.
    • Optional: access to a bicycle

Inclusive Maker Provocation Instructions

Part 1: Pre-activity Reflection — Understanding your own positionality in bike culture

Think about your current experiences and knowledge when it comes to biking and bike culture. By reflecting on these questions beforehand, you can better understand your personal lens and become more aware of how your own experiences and identities shape the way you engage with biking spaces and community interactions.

Some questions to consider:

    • What is your personal history with biking? Do you view it more as a form of transportation, recreation, fitness or something else?
    • How often do you engage in biking activities, and in what kinds of spaces (i.e. recreational trails, urban commutes, group events)?
    • Have you experienced barriers to accessing biking spaces, whether economic, social, physical, etc.? How have they shaped your relationship to biking?
    • Do you see people who share your identity and background in biking spaces you frequent? How does this affect your sense of belonging?
    • Are there stereotypes or assumptions within biking culture that impact on how people perceive you or that shape how you perceive others?
Part 2: Participate —
Visit your library’s zine section
    1. Visit your library’s zine section, and browse the selection of bike-related zines
    2. Select a few zines to read, pay attention to the different voices, styles and stories represented
    3. Take notes on reoccurring themes, especially in relation to gender, race, accessibility or personal experiences in the bike community

Some questions to consider:

    • Who is the author and how does their background and identity impact their experiences within the bike community?
    • How do the perspectives in the zines compare with the mainstream cycling media or bike shops?
    • What issues or themes appear frequently across the zines? What is something novel or surprising that you’ve noticed about the zines? What are some themes that you can relate to personally?
    • How do the zine creators express their identities and experiences through their zines? Are there recurring challenges or barriers that they discuss?
    • How do the zines influence your understanding of the biking community? How does that affect your perspective of your understanding of the bike community?

If you do not have a zine section at your local library, consider reading through online eZines related to bike culture, here are some recommendations:

    • Cyclista Zine Library : a collaborative zine made from intersectional feminist and DIY culture lens. It is run by zinester Christina Torres and celebrates intersectional feminism through zines, live events and workshops.
    • Microcosm Publishing Bike Zines : should you have the funds and means, check out some bike zines Microcosm Publishing, a zine publisher based in Portland, Oregon.
Part 3: Create — Record and share your experiences in a zine

    1. Follow the instructions above to make a simple one-page zine as a base to document your reflections from the previous activities.
    2. Embellish your zine with illustrations or make a collage with my arts and crafts supplies that you have available.

Some additional resources: 

The Creative Independent – How to Make a Zine

Critical Questions for Consideration

    • How do you feel about entering spaces that may be new or unfamiliar? Are there any assumptions or expectations you hold about bike shops, biking events, or zine culture?
    • In what ways are you open to letting this experience challenge or expand your existing views on biking culture, inclusivity, and community dynamics?
    • In what ways could this provocation be adapted to other subcultures or community activities where marginalized voices are underrepresented? How might this broaden students’ understanding of inclusivity in various societal domains?

Background/Additional Information

Inclusivity Focus

This challenge considers the EDIDA framework with emphasis on exploring biking spaces in relation to the student’s own positionality, encouraging students to access who these spaces are designed to serve and who may be excluded or underrepresented.

The activity also includes diverse ways to engage with the biking culture and community (see Extension section below) – whether it is visiting a bike shop, attending an event, or exploration via zines — students with varying physical abilities, comfort levels and preferences can participate meaningfully.

Lastly, I have purposefully included zines as a source of learning as it engages with the decolonization framework by valuing non-traditional, grassroots forms of knowledge production and distribution. Zines often represent marginalized voices and disrupt dominant narratives, offering insight to biking culture and underrepresented voices often missed in academic literature.

No Tech, Low Tech, High Tech Options

Zines are quintessentially low-tech, DIY methods of sharing knowledge and experiences, easily made with pen and paper, and a photocopier if you would like to share and distribute your zines!

Some higher-tech options for sharing similar kinds of DIY content include:

    • Blogs/Personal Website
    • Digital Zine/eZine
    • Social Media
    • Podcast/ Youtube Channel

Extension

Choose an activity below and follow the guiding instructions to help reflect on your experience. These activities are made to include a broad range of involvement and participation, and are mindful of certain barriers, such as access to a bicycle, different levels of mobility and skill levels, and meant to expand in the different ways participation can look like.

Nonetheless, these activities and questions aim to deepen your understanding of the diverse, often overlooked experiences within biking culture and help you explore how your own perspectives interact with these communities. Enjoy the journey!

Visit a local bike shop
    1. Choose a bike shop near you and make a visit. As you explore space, pay attention to how the space is organized and who the shop seems to be designed to serve.
    2. Observe the shop’s environment, the types of bikes and gears available, and any information displayed about events or cycling groups.
    3. If possible, strike up a conversation with an employee to learn more about the shop’s role in the local biking community

Some questions to consider:

    • Who does this bike shop seem to cater to? Are there specific demographics that seem prioritized in this set up, product offerings or marketing?
    • What aspects of the shop make it feel inclusive or exclusive? Consider factors like pricing, layout and accessibility.
    • How does the shop engage with local community? Do they advertise any events or promote social causes on their bulletin boards?
    • How did you feel going into this space, what about it made it feel welcoming or intimidating? Did you feel comfortable being in this space?
Participate in a bike event
    1. Find a local bike event that is open to all skill levels, like a group ride or a community bike day.
    2. Participate in the event, look around and make note of the people involved, the event’s purpose and the general atmosphere
    3. Notice how newcomers are welcomed, and whether accessibility (in terms of skill level, gender, background) is addressed during the event

Some questions to consider:

    • What kinds of people attended this event? Are there particular groups that seem well-represented or under-represented?
    • In what ways was the event accessible or inaccessible to people with different needs or backgrounds?
    • How did the event organizers foster a sense of community or shared purpose? Were there any efforts made to address diversity or inclusivity?
    • How did you feel about participating in this event? How does your own identity and experience shape your sense of belonging or connection? Would you participate in a similar event again?

Spam prevention powered by Akismet