{"id":160,"date":"2013-06-07T16:21:40","date_gmt":"2013-06-07T20:21:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/etec565abates\/?p=160"},"modified":"2013-06-06T10:01:03","modified_gmt":"2013-06-06T14:01:03","slug":"delivery-platform-evaluation-rubric","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/etec565abates\/2013\/06\/07\/delivery-platform-evaluation-rubric\/","title":{"rendered":"Delivery Platform Evaluation Rubric"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2><strong>Assignment<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>In your discussion group, develop a evaluation rubric for selecting an\u00a0<em>online<\/em>\u00a0delivery platform, either for K-12, community or higher education (your group will be assigned a scenario for one of these educational sectors). By Friday of next week, you will post your rubric as an attachment to a message in the discussion forum thread \u201cOur group\u2019s rubric\u201d. In your attachment be sure to include:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>A pr\u00e9cis of your group\u2019s scenario<\/li>\n<li>Your detailed evaluation rubric, organized by categories<\/li>\n<li>A one paragraph articulation of why you included what you included, citing relevant literature<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h2><strong>Response to\u00a0YESNet Scenario<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h3 dir=\"ltr\"><strong>Group 3 Members<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>Sarah Richer<\/li>\n<li>Ryan Dub\u00e9<\/li>\n<li>Mark Bates<\/li>\n<li>Rocky Lam<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h3 dir=\"ltr\"><strong>Pr\u00e9cis of our Group\u2019s Scenario<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">Yukon Education Student Network (YESNet) and Yukon First Nations Programs &amp; Partnerships Unit of the Yukon\u2019s Ministry of Education want to develop blended secondary courses that are relevant from an Aboriginal perspective.<\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">The Na Cho Nyak Dun First Nation has agreed to pilot the program, but there are concerns about bandwidth and reliability of internet access in their traditional, unceded territories: many of its members rely on 3G technology, for example. If the pilot goes well the program will be rolled out across the Yukon\u2019s other 12 First Nations.<\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">As members of YESNet&#8217;s Learning Technologies Advisory Committee (LTAC) we have been tasked with developing an evaluation rubric to decide which LMS would best suit YESNet\u2019s overall needs, given both current usage and possible upcoming expansion.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h3 dir=\"ltr\"><strong>Articulation Statement<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">This rubric uses a criteria model focusing on how well the LMS is, &#8220;optimized for supporting important instructional activities&#8221; (Kim &amp; Lee, 2007) instead of the traditional inventory-type evaluation framework (Stewart et al., 2007). The criteria has been modified to take into account the specific needs of the Yukon Education Student Network (YESNet) and Yukon First Nations Programs &amp; Partnerships Unit of the Yukon\u2019s Ministry of Education who want to develop blended secondary courses that are relevant from an Aboriginal social constructivist perspective (McLoughlin, C., &amp; Oliver, R., 2000).<\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">The analytic rubric is divided into two sections: Pr\u00e9cis Mandate and Effective Learning Environment. These sections assess the functionality of the LMS based on an administration perspective as well as the level of interactive tools offered that enhance learning opportunities and interaction for the learner and educator. A scale is used from 0 to 3 to facilitate the scoring of each criterion to assess the overall quality and usefulness of the LMS for the Yukon Education Student Network and Ministry of Education unit but it is also applicable for other educational institutions. \u00a0The results of the scoring assessment help to determine the aspects that are important to the investor and whether the LMS meets the needs of the community it is serving. \u00a0**Specific weighting of subcategories within the Precis Mandate and Effective Learning Environment categories are recommended. Such weighting would, be based on a point scale, effectively allowing subcategories to be prioritized according to the user&#8217;s unique environment and needs.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h3 dir=\"ltr\"><strong>Detailed Evaluation Rubric<\/strong><\/h3>\n<div id=\"attachment_163\" style=\"width: 241px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/etec565abates\/files\/2013\/06\/Delivery-Platform-Evaluation-Rubric-YESNet.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-163\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-163 \" alt=\"\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/etec565abates\/files\/2013\/06\/Delivery-Platform-Evaluation-Rubric-YESNet-231x300.png\" width=\"231\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/etec565abates\/files\/2013\/06\/Delivery-Platform-Evaluation-Rubric-YESNet-231x300.png 231w, https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/etec565abates\/files\/2013\/06\/Delivery-Platform-Evaluation-Rubric-YESNet-791x1024.png 791w, https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/etec565abates\/files\/2013\/06\/Delivery-Platform-Evaluation-Rubric-YESNet.png 1700w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 231px) 100vw, 231px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-163\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Please click image to enlarge<\/p><\/div>\n<p dir=\"ltr\" style=\"text-align: center;\">Download PDF version of\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/etec565abates\/files\/2013\/06\/Delivery-Platform-Evaluation-Rubric-YESNet.pdf\">Delivery Platform Evaluation Rubric YESNet<\/a><\/p>\n<h3 dir=\"ltr\"><strong>References<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">Anderson, T. (2008). Towards a Theory of Online Learning. In The Theory and Practice of Online\u00a0Learning (45-74). Edmonton: AU Press.<\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">Kim, S.W. &amp; Lee, M.G. (2008). Validation of an evaluation model for learning management\u00a0systems. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24: 284\u2013294. doi:10.1111\/j.1365-2729.2007.00260.x<\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">McLoughlin, C., &amp; Oliver, R. (2000). Designing learning environments for cultural inclusivity: A\u00a0case study of indigenous online learning at tertiary level. \u00a0Australian Journal of\u00a0Educational Technology, 16(1), 58-72. Retrieved from\u00a0http:\/\/ascilite.org.au\/ajet\/ajet16\/mcloughlin.html<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h3 dir=\"ltr\"><strong>Bibliography<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">Caudill, J. (2007). The Growth of m-Learning and the Growth of Mobile Computing: Parallel\u00a0developments. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 8(2),\u00a01-13.<\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">Kouninef, R., Tlemsani, S., Rerbal, M. &amp; Lotfi, A. (2012). Developing a Mobile Learning Approach\u00a0in Platform LMS INTTIC. Information Technology Journal, 11(8), 1131-1137.<\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">Ozkan, S., &amp; Koseler, R. (2009). Multi-dimensional students\u2019 evaluation of e-learning systems in\u00a0the higher education context: An empirical investigation. Computers &amp; Education,53(4),\u00a01285-1296. doi:10.1016\/j.compedu.2009.06.011<\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">Papastergiou, M. (2006). Course Management Systems as Tools for the Creation of Online\u00a0Learning Environments: Evaluation from a Social Constructivist Perspective and\u00a0Implications for their Design. International Journal On E-Learning,5(4), 593-622.<\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">Stewart, B., Briton, D., Gismondi, M., Heller, B., Kennepohl, D., McGreal, R., &amp; Nelson, C.(2007). Choosing MOODLE: An evaluation of learning management systems at\u00a0Athabasca University. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 5(3),\u00a01-7. Retrieved from\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/search.proquest.com.ezproxy.library.ubc.ca\/docview\/201699778?accountid=14656\">http:\/\/search.proquest.com.ezproxy.library.ubc.ca\/docview\/201699778?accountid=14656<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In your discussion group, develop a evaluation rubric for selecting an online delivery platform, either for K-12, community or higher education (your group will be assigned a scenario for one of these educational sectors).<\/p>\n<div class=\"read-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/etec565abates\/2013\/06\/07\/delivery-platform-evaluation-rubric\/\">Read more &#8250;<\/a><\/div>\n<p><!-- end of .read-more --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":15922,"featured_media":163,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[734,2559,163,333,305210],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-160","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-eportfolio","category-group-work","category-module-2","category-responses","category-unit-3"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/etec565abates\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/160","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/etec565abates\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/etec565abates\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/etec565abates\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/15922"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/etec565abates\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=160"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/etec565abates\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/160\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":168,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/etec565abates\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/160\/revisions\/168"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/etec565abates\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/163"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/etec565abates\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=160"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/etec565abates\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=160"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/etec565abates\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=160"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}