Categories
Contributions Student Directed Seminar

Reflecting on Galeano, by Samara Mayer (student directed seminar)

Last weeks reading by Eduardo Galeano (Open Veins of Latin America) provides a detailed depiction of the historical forces that have shaped Latin America today. The author provides a historical account of the exploitation and colonization, working hardships, land degradation and cultural losses of the indigenous populations of Latin America. He forces one to pause and consider the current situation of indigenous populations in Latin America today and it’s relationship to the past. Currently, indigenous populations of Latin America are struggling and small, making up roughly 10.17% of the total population in Latin America (Montenegro and Stephens 2006). They have higher mortality and morbidity indicators that their non Indigenous counterparts, and “…in some cases indigeneity can be a proxy indicators of poverty against which to measure health disparities”(Montenegro and Stephens 2006: 1863).

The vivid picture Galeano paints of historical indigenous exploitation is not limited to his area of study. Upon further investigation of other countries, regions, states, cities, and towns, it is clear that this concept does not exist within a single locality, but rather is global in nature. The world wide indigenous colonization, exploitation, and destruction can be found in Africa, the Arctic, Asian Countries, India, North America, in our own cities and towns, its hard to find a place where such events have not occurred. As such, one is forced to consider why certain individuals, cultures, even entire countries experience poverty while others prosper. It is through an analysis of the historical particularities of cultural groups that we can come to understand current inequality as embedded in systems of long standing hegemony. Galeano writes of the Indians that have suffered and continue to suffer, the curse of their own wealth, as the drama of all Latin America (Galeano 1973:47), but perhaps this is the drama of indigenous groups around the world.

This concept is important when critically considering the need and application of aid in international and community settings. To approach a group and lend aid, I feel requires a consideration of why these individuals need this help. What led them to their current state of impoverishment, malnutrition, homelessness, disease or famine? It is difficult to pin point an exact causation of such complex states, but I feel a consideration is necessary. By acknowledging the historicity of the situation perhaps more effective aid can be organized while similarly pushing individuals to more carefully consider cultural context to provide assistance in a more unbiased, uncritical, and effective manner. Who these individuals and groups truly are, and the situations they are in are as much a result of unfortunate circumstance as the historical particularities of their culture and the long-standing restrictions it has imposed upon them. As a service provider I feel it is important to strive towards truly understanding the situation of the receiver. With this perhaps stigma may also dissipate, allowing for proper representation of groups and more effective intervening aid.

Categories
Contributions Personal Experience

Diving in: Watery New-Year’s Resolutions

By Sambriddhi Nepal

*** Editor’s Note: Today marks the one year anniversary of the earthquake in Haiti. A minute of silence will be observed at 1:53pm Pacific Time, the exact moment when the 7.0 magnitude quake hit.

Originally, this piece was meant to be about Haiti. Having lived there, I wanted to write through a more personal stand point. I started compiling some information about the most recent events there. The hurricane, cholera, earthquake relief. I gathered some information about aid money, watched videos on a variety of news websites, and read countless magazine articles.. After two weeks, I felt I had immersed myself rather deeply in the murky waters of Haitian politics and international relations. I was all set this weekend to write an article about some views on Haiti and the November 28 elections, when I opened my homepage of BBC on my internet browser and saw the news about Wikileaks.

Reading a bit about that, I tried – and failed – to understand the politically very complex issue that has continued to develop over the past couple of days. After a good forty-five minutes of browsing the web for more information about what these leaks meant, I went back to my BBC homepage to look for more on the Haiti elections.

Naturally, having been immersed in issues of that country for the past three weeks, I was indignant at finding that Haiti did not feature in the top read news on the website that day. Nor did it appear in the top read news on the CNN website, or on the New York Times, or in the Guardian.

My passion about Haiti and the change (or not) that it is going through isn’t necesarrily someone else’s passion. This is obvious enough, but in that moment it struck me as something particularly eye-opening. I had waded into the issue of Haiti, far enough that mostly when I was reading the news, I was looking for news on that particular country. My focus was Haiti, and I didn’t understand why it wasn’t everyone else’s.

This is particularly hypocritical, considering I had neglected, in my ‘Haiti-immersion’ to read about Nepal, or about Burma, or about other issues that I was particularly interested in. For a moment, when the first Wikileaks article appeared on the BBC website, I had dipped my toes into that issue’s murky waters.

This is what the headlines lead us to. This is what I did myself. Minute by minute, hour by hour, day by day; as the headlines change, we focus on transformations happening in our world. We dip our toes. It is difficult, yet necessary, I feel, to take that leap. To dive into the murky waters and immerse ourselves in long term issues and consequences of the minute by minute changes. While the headlines make it easy to forget about the Haitian earthquake that happened nearly 11 months ago, or about the Pakistani floods, people’s immersion into these issues is what keeps them alive.

I’m not usually one to make New Year’s resolutions. I’m very pessimistic about my own ability to keep them. But this year, I’ll make one. I want to immerse myself in one issue. I want to read up on and know as much as I can about Haiti. Somewhere I’ve lived, a country dear to me. As the one-year anniversary of the devastating earthquake comes up, this seems more necessary than ever.

I can’t immerse myself in every issue. But I can educate the world through my immersion. Just as someone else immersed in another issue can educate me about that. Headlines and dipping our toes is important, but it’s the knee-deep ideas that will bring education, and eventually, change.

Categories
Contributions Debatables Personal Experience

To the Beat of a Somewhat Different Drum: a Senior Volunteer’s Perspective

By Hal Whiteman

These are, perhaps, not the usual observations to appear on this blog.  While they are mostly about student volunteers, they are not by one.  Let me nail my volunteer colours to the mast straightaway; I am a semi-retired, short-term volunteer in his 60s, who recently completed a month at a provincial university in southern Vietnam, helping them with their business planning.

I am writing this post at the behest of my son, who suggested that there may be some merit in my offering some thoughts on the performance of student volunteers, with a view to making suggestions as to how their efforts might bear more fruit.  In setting out these views I do not mean to suggest for an instant that my outlook is any wiser or more productive.  Productivity is to a significant extent the luck of the draw; if I had come a couple of months earlier, before a positive change in management in the office I worked with, my work would have had much less effect.  And I’m sure I made my share of gaffes, both cultural and professional, that undercut my contribution.

The volunteers I encountered fall roughly into three categories: long-term volunteers, for whom development assistance is a career; shorter-term volunteers, whose expertise is of specific use to the university; and students who are taking a term or a summer away from studies to volunteer in a variety of capacities.

The long-term volunteers are, to me, the stars among the front-line workers; they are committed and work long hours for little compensation.  They accept that progress will be slow and uneven, and that culture usually, although not always, takes precedence over change.  They are there to help the community build capacity.  Their job is, to them, more than just a job – it is a way of life.

Those like me, older and with specific skills, will succeed or fail depending on three principal factors: how well and how quickly we adapt quickly to culture and circumstances; whether there is a good match between what the organization wants and what we can deliver; and how hard and diligently we work.  Because most of us have a long work experience to draw on, we are better able to take initiative in the absence of specific direction.

Student volunteers bring energy and enthusiasm to their assignments, and like all volunteers, mixed motives.  They sincerely want to help make a better world, they are thrilled at the idea of seeing a different part of it, and they revel at the prospect of  new experiences. They are prepared to do whatever they are asked, whether in their job description or not.  These traits can carry them a long way, but they bring limitations as well.  It’s not that they are here on a lark, but my perception is that most have little sense of or interest in the longer term impact of their presence here, no interest in gauging the success or failure of their mandate.  They are generally not sufficiently motivated (or perhaps confident) to take independent initiative.  Most work short hours, negotiate three-day weekends to go to Saigon or Bangkok, and generally enjoy life.

In part, they are able to do this as a result of complicity on the part of the host organization, which wants them to have the time and opportunity to enjoy the local environment.  I could have done the same.  I don’t mean to suggest that they are insensitive to the different cultural norms here; they dress modestly, behave correctly, include the Vietnamese in some of their activities, and take an interest in the minorities.  But in the end volunteer service will, for most of them, be just another one of life’s experiences, not rooted in any particular view of the world or specific ideas for its betterment.  It will end when their assignment ends.

Without exception, and this may be a personal as much as a generational difference, they are almost completely ahistorical in outlook.  With one exception, the student volunteers I encountered all come from European backgrounds.  Without exception, they know and care little about their own Judeo-Christian, Greco-Roman roots and modes of thought.  Frequently I heard remarks like “their music is really weird” or “I don’t understand how they can eat dog”.  Thus we often judge the customs and traditions of others without recognizing our own cultural biases.    A more serious shortcoming I have come across in many places, including Vietnam, is the assumption that easy smiles are tokens of happiness amid the most desperate circumstances (“Well, they may be incredibly poor, but they seem quite content”).  Ignored is the fact that they may lack clean drinking water or functional literacy.  There is a failure to recognize that we easily confuse happiness (a dominant western value) with acceptance (predominant in eastern and other societies).

So our western heritage is a closed book to many student volunteers, one which they have no interest in opening.  Asia and Africa offer a different cultural experience, with sights, sounds, tastes, smells that take them beyond their normal lives without requiring them to examine their assumptions about what they are experiencing.  Europe is old, fusty, expensive, and in these days when travel to developing countries is increasingly easy, perhaps a bit intimidating.  I always remind myself that if I don’t know who I am, culturally speaking, I will have a diminished ability to understand and appreciate the culture of others.  And I’m quite sure that I am often guilty of unrecognized cultural judgments.

In themselves, these are not unmanageable problems.  Many parts of the university where I was stationed lack the capability to provide better direction, so it is hard to expect young volunteers without significant management experience to do better.

A more serious concern is, in my view, a failure to recognize adequately their duty of care.  Someone is footing the bill to put them in the field, and the host organization devotes considerable time and effort to supporting them.  Vietnamese for the most part set an excellent example, working long hours for low pay, and taking evening and weekend classes in order to improve their qualifications.  One wonders when we go home how our hosts judge us as workers.

I should stress that my perceptions of student volunteers may be unrepresentative, as they are based on observations covering a few weeks in one location.  I did, however, also seek the views of a number of long-term volunteers, who by and large confirmed these impressions.

I hesitate to offer definitive advice on how to behave in the field.  It’s certainly not reasonable to expect student volunteers to have management experience or judgment which is normally acquired over the span of a career.  But tentatively I would suggest that any short-term volunteer, whether a greybeard like me or a student, should ask themselves five questions as a way of deciding how to behave in the field:

  1. Am I honouring the ideal of international service-learning in a way that recognizes the contribution, financial and otherwise, of others who have put me in the field and are supporting me while there?
  2. Do I think about when to act in full conformity with local customs, counterproductive as they may be, and when to resist them (as sensitively as possible) because they don’t produce transfer of knowledge or building of capacity, which are really what westerners can provide.
  3. How do I balance knowledge transfer against capacity building – when is a stony silence, a function of language problems, when a problem with concept and when a failure to engage, and how do I decide on the best strategy?
  4. What can I learn from other volunteers?  Perhaps I am overly sensitive on this point, but without exception the student volunteers when with me failed what a young friend of mine calls “the question test”.  I was always careful to ask them about their background and work in Vietnam, partly in friendship but also to help me understand how to be a better volunteer. Without exception, they did not ask me a single thing about my own experience, although I have learned certain lessons over my career that could have helped them deal with some of the obstacles they face.  In other circumstances this would not trouble me.  We are two generations apart in age, and they have their own lives to live and their own interests to cultivate.  But as an anonymous French medievalist wrote “the advice of the old is like the winter sun: it sheds light but does not warm us.”  Perhaps those like me can shed some light that would enrich the student volunteer experience.
  5. How can I continue to be helpful beyond the end of my mandate?  It is one thing to keep in contact for purposes of friendship; it is something else altogether to continue to help once you are home.  In any educational institution, real change takes a long time to occur, and requires extended effort to sustain.  That friendship can be much richer and more valuable if it is based not only on personal affection but also on continuing professional support.

The future of international service learning lies with today’s student volunteers: you have the time, resources, intelligence and education to make a difference over the long term.  Use them well.

Categories
Contributions Personal Experience

We Have Much to be Thankful For

By Sambriddhi Nepal

Walking into Shree JanaUdaya Lower Secondary School in Kathmandu having spent the year abroad at one of the best universities in the world, I was immediately struck by how lucky I am. The building wasn’t painted, there was mud surrounding the gates of the school, and the classrooms’ windows had no glass or screens on them. I could only imagine the itchy mosquito bites the children must have, and the inescapable cold they faced in the winter.

There was a rush of commotion as the students, who knew of our arrival as volunteers, came running out of their classes to wave and say “hello,” something any Nepali – from the innocent vendor on a street to the creepy men staring at you – will say to a foreigner.

The second thought that came to mind was how these children were smiling more than most people I meet abroad. This is amazing considering the burdens they face, being from poor working class families. They waved and the brave ones came up to us to practice their English, something they rarely get to do. When they found out I was Nepali, the first thing they asked me was my last name, so that they could know which caste I was from. I wasn’t surprised. Our country is secular only by name. The stigmas of the caste system still remain.

We went inside the Principal’s office to talk to him about what we had planned for the coming week. I asked him about the school’s library and again wasn’t surprised to hear him say that they were ‘planning on organizing the library.’ Typical. All talk. We asked to see the library. I was again not surprised to see that it was a big mess. The school had been donated literally thousands of books from other schools and organizations such as Room to Read. However, they weren’t being put to use. I couldn’t help but think of the hundreds of other schools in Kathmandu whose ‘libraries’ looked exactly the same.

The two other volunteers and I told him our plan: we could clean up the library, organize the books, and would come back later to make sure that the library was being used properly. The principal mentioned that he had ‘planned’ on putting carpets in the room, and that the carpeting would be done by tomorrow.

We returned the next day and were surprised to see the carpets in place in both the library and the reading room (which was right next to the library). We set to work immediately. For the next two days, we worked on organizing the books, getting rid of ones that were not suitable for low-level English speakers, and we bought some more books for the library so that we could have more colorful, exciting books for the children.

All this while, the children, curious as they are, would come up to the windows of the reading room and watch us working. Smiling occasionally and some would bravely come up and talk to us about what we were doing. I asked one girl her name, and when she said it was Kaavya, I remembered with a jolt that she was a student who had been receiving a scholarship from the NGO I had been working for. I had read about her parents, who were from a low caste and did not have good jobs, and about her 4 siblings and how her eldest brother was working as a laborer to provide for the family. To see this girl in person and have a face to the student profile I had written in the comfort of my office brought tears to my eyes.

The last day of our volunteering, I walked into the school and a smiling young girl in the 7th grade gave me a flower, which I immediately put in my hair. Later, that girl came into the library, which was now open for the students and smiled brightly when she saw that I was still wearing the flower in my hair. She found so much joy in so little a thing.

The library had been set up, as had the reading room. The bravest 10 students walked in and immediately picked out books and began to read. They shared stories and talked about the pictures in the books. As we took pictures of them, they barely seemed to notice. They were so wrapped up in their books and sharing stories with the students.

My happiness at being there was tainted a bit by one of the other two volunteers I was working with, who insisted that we have one of the students pose with a book so we could have ‘a good PR photo.’ I said nothing, but would have much preferred to not be taking pictures at all rather than having a posed picture.

I sat with that little girl, who turned out to be a 2nd grader and read a Nepali book with her for a little bit, and when we walked down to the courtyard hand in hand, her friends joined me. The other little girls insisted that I return another day and read more books with them. When I promised I would, one of the girls said “that’s what you say now, but you probably won’t even come back.” This made me want to cry again – yes, I did that a lot throughout this week – as I wondered what kind of promises had been made to them before that hadn’t been kept. I showed them a pinky promise, and promised I’d be back.

I’ll mentally prepare myself better next time, and go back to the school aiming only for smiles this time.

Categories
Contributions Debatables Personal Experience

Negotiating for an Ethical Middle Ground

By Yan Xu

A week ago, I sat in on a meeting where one of the topics of discussion was an organization (student-driven, new organization, grassroots, etc) that works with communities in Kenya, promoting HIV/AIDS awareness that wanted to collaborate with a club that I am part of.

What went through in my mind was the following: Come on, can they or do they plan to teach their communities anything other than using safe contraceptives? Do these people need to fund-raise, fly all the way over to Kenya and tell people there to abstain from high-risk behaviours for HIV transmission?

Of course, I, intending to tell the members of the executive committee to consider the capacity of science undergrad students to inform Kenyans half a world away, said something to the effect of “what can a bunch of Microbiology students do in a community like that?”  All heads in the room turned to me with shock and dismay, and I immediately stopped, not because I was in complete disagreement from the rest of the group, but because I realized I had crossed a personal boundary.  There I was, effectively denigrating a well-intentioned student group.

For the rest of the day, 3 questions circled my mind:

  1. Have I taken “ethicizing” too far?
  2. Did I belittle the capacity of the student group (almost an unequivocal yes)?
  3. Would a more fruitful approach have been consulting with this group regarding what type of community outreach they were going to do (then if they told me that they were only going to teach the locals how to use contraceptives, would that then justify my reaction, because I went through the process of consultation?)

A good friend astutely mentioned that being involved in ethical dialogue runs the risk of assuming the position of embarrassing superiority, where we consider our moral stance to be somehow higher because we are examining issues that hadn’t been considered by say, the group that sought to collaborate with my club.  Good intentions and careful scrutiny of unintended effects need not oppose each other, but to achieve partnership between the two, we need to first commit to recognizing and validating the good intentions, before we take our theoretical lenses and place one’s well-intended project under the microscope, and recommend how potential barriers to the meaningful change they seek can be overcome.

Categories
Contributions Debatables

Role Call to Corporate Social Responsibility

By Paul Bain

I have been reading various articles on the debate around Canada’s foreign CSR. It is a tough issue and I am still unsure where I stand on the matter.  I do not want to try to lay out specific laws that should govern corporations because I feel that CSR is still evolving and CSR standards will be constantly changing over the next decade.  Therefore, I want to focus this blog on answering this question: What role does party have with ensuring CSR?

The Shareholders of the Corporation: The shareholders have an important role in upholding CSR.  Ideally, prospective investors should be responsible to consciously invest in companies which respect CSR.  I believe that shareholders should demand for public disclosure of information corresponding with CSR issues.  A third party CSR audit system should be implemented to establish legitimate transparency.   These initiatives will enable the Government of Canada and the clients of the corporation, to better understand the initiatives taken by the corporation to uphold its social responsibility.

The Customer of the Corporation: Customer’s have the duty of researching and learning about the corporation’s CSR policies.  The customer then has the power to choose which corporation they will support and buy from.  Customer’s can pressure corporation’s (with their wallet’s and voices) to incorporate CSR into their business mandate.

NGOs: The role of NGOs is to help share information with the public about a corporations CSR practices.  NGOs can act as a ‘watchdog’ by spreading awareness about CSR abuses.  NGO’s that are active in a foreign state (where corporations are involved) have the opportunity to provide insight into the corporation’s effects on the local community.

The Government of Canada: The GOC should apply pressure on Canadian corporations to uphold their domestic CSR regulations when they are working in foreign countries. The GOC should be taxing corporations who are not conducting foreign CSR.  The GOC should also provide positive incentives for a corporation’s compliance with CSR, such as tax breaks or a governmental stamp of CSR approval rating (something like certified Dolphin free tuna) to attract more conscience customers.

The Foreign Country’s Government: While this role may be the most important to ensure foreign CSR, it is possibly the least accountable.  In developing countries it may be difficult to enforce strict CSR regulations when there is a dire need for foreign investment.  There is also the issue of wealthy corporations ‘paying off’ foreign governments to avoid their domestic legislation on CSR.

Categories
Contributions Debatables

Student Letter To the Editor on Celebrity Aid

By Yan Xu

The below is a letter in response to the article on celebrity voices mentioned in Monday’s post, sent to the editor of The Province:

    EDUCATING CELEBRITIES ON BEST PRACTICES

Re: Jan 25th article, Why slam the good that celebrities achieve?

Firstly, allow me to acknowledge the wonderful work that Africa Canada Accountability Coalition (ACAC) is doing in bringing forth awareness of the Congolese situation to the fore of UBC campus.  While it is certain that there is still much work to be done, their initiatives have been increasingly gaining recognition from the University community.

I would like to pose more questions than answers.  And before I begin, a disclaimer: I am not an expert on the issue of development or foreign aid.

The concept of celebrity-aid fundamentally calls into question, “is it ethically correct to use the influence that celebrities have to raise awareness to an issue, even if some of the values that are portrayed through the entertainment industry are not necessarily positive?”  Specifically, I refer to the fact that much of the wealth legitimately lavished upon these talented individuals come from international policies that have directly or indirectly resulted in plight and poverty of the under-resourced countries.  And ironically, now they’re turning around and trying to “fix the problem.” But that’s for another time; ‘aid by celebrity’ is occurring all around us and will not be fading away anytime soon, so let’s take a critical lens at the acts themselves.

Assuming that the motivations of these celebrities in helping a country in need are not for selfish gains, I still believe that the issue of celebrity-based philanthropy falls into the gray zone of advocacy.  It raises the question, “are celebrities adequately aware of the scope and complexities of the issues to make public appeals for a country or its people?”  The majority of celebrities that have banded in solidarity for the cause of alleviating poverty or disaster relief, I contend, do not.  They do not fully understand the geopolitical situations of the area that is affected, or how its socioeconomic structures and cultural norms would affect the delivery of aid in those regions.  They are touched by the urgent disasters happening in the world, and perhaps believe, first and foremost, that the world ought to rally with them for what is happening in Haiti, Somalia or Ethiopia, and is for this reason that they resort to the portrayal of peoples in these regions as helpless individuals, to prompt us to act.  They have done well; Canada for Haiti, for example, raised more than $27 million.  But the collateral damage, as Bergen from ACAC has astutely mentioned, is reinforcement of the ‘helpless victim’ stereotype.

So, how do we address this issue? No, good intentions are not enough, but equally, it is not enough for us to slam them for their good intentions and move on.  What the celebrities (and advocates) need, I firmly believe, is meaningful, constructive and balanced dialogue, not only with researchers, but more importantly with the people that they hope to serve.  Too often we are too caught up in thinking about how to “fix” underdevelopment, and ignore the simple power of authentic conversations with the people that we are speaking out for.  After all, it is not a battle between celebrities and advocates; both parties would form a ridiculous circus if they do not realize that the real battle is fought by the everyday, ordinary people impoverished by war, famine or tyranny, and that they are the experts from whom we ought to learn and consult.

Yan Xu

University of British Columbia student in the Faculty of Science, currently coordinating one of 27 approved student directed seminars, semester-long courses facilitated solely by students that have received teaching and academic training.  This seminar, titled “Topics in International Service-Learning,” explores ethical, sustainability and intercultural concerns related to short-term service engagement by students in under-resourced countries, working with vulnerable populations.

    EDUCATING CELEBRITIES ON BEST PRACTICES

Re: Jan 25th article, Why slam the good that celebrities achieve?

Firstly, allow me to acknowledge the wonderful work that Africa Canada Accountability Coalition (ACAC) is doing in bringing forth awareness of the Congolese situation to the fore of UBC campus.  While it is certain that there is still much work to be done, their initiatives have been increasingly gaining recognition from the University community.

I would like to pose more questions than answers.  And before I begin, a disclaimer: I am not an expert on the issue of development or foreign aid.

The concept of celebrity-aid fundamentally calls into question, “is it ethically correct to use the influence that celebrities have to raise awareness to an issue, even if some of the values that are portrayed through the entertainment industry are not necessarily positive?”  Specifically, I refer to the fact that much of the wealth legitimately lavished upon these talented individuals come from international policies that have directly or indirectly resulted in plight and poverty of the under-resourced countries.  And ironically, now they’re turning around and trying to “fix the problem.” But that’s for another time; ‘aid by celebrity’ is occurring all around us and will not be fading away anytime soon, so let’s take a critical lens at the acts themselves.

Assuming that the motivations of these celebrities in helping a country in need are not for selfish gains, I still believe that the issue of celebrity-based philanthropy falls into the gray zone of advocacy.  It raises the question, “are celebrities adequately aware of the scope and complexities of the issues to make public appeals for a country or its people?”  The majority of celebrities that have banded in solidarity for the cause of alleviating poverty or disaster relief, I contend, do not.  They do not fully understand the geopolitical situations of the area that is affected, or how its socioeconomic structures and cultural norms would affect the delivery of aid in those regions.  They are touched by the urgent disasters happening in the world, and perhaps believe, first and foremost, that the world ought to rally with them for what is happening in Haiti, Somalia or Ethiopia, and is for this reason that they resort to the portrayal of peoples in these regions as helpless individuals, to prompt us to act.  They have done well; Canada for Haiti, for example, raised more than $27 million.  But the collateral damage, as Bergen from ACAC has astutely mentioned, is reinforcement of the ‘helpless victim’ stereotype.

So, how do we address this issue? No, good intentions are not enough, but equally, it is not enough for us to slam them for their good intentions and move on.  What the celebrities (and advocates) need, I firmly believe, is meaningful, constructive and balanced dialogue, not only with researchers, but more importantly with the people that they hope to serve.  Too often we are too caught up in thinking about how to “fix” underdevelopment, and ignore the simple power of authentic conversations with the people that we are speaking out for.  After all, it is not a battle between celebrities and advocates; both parties would form a ridiculous circus if they do not realize that the real battle is fought by the everyday, ordinary people impoverished by war, famine or tyranny, and that they are the experts from whom we ought to learn and consult.

Yan Xu

University of British Columbia student in the Faculty of Science, currently coordinating one of 27 approved student directed seminars, semester-long courses facilitated solely by students that have received teaching and academic training.  This seminar, titled “Topics in International Service-Learning,” explores ethical, sustainability and intercultural concerns related to short-term service engagement by students in under-resourced countries, working with vulnerable populations.

Categories
Contributions Personal Experience

The week in review

By Chaya Erika Go

January 18-22 was a week for many things:

There was the Africa Awareness Conference Week, a hearty celebration of the continent and a campaign to further increase its presence in our campus. There was poetry, music, storytelling, fruitful conversations, and (oh so) much dancing! After all it is nice to be reminded, and as a Canadian archaeologist from SFU side-commented to a bevy of usherettes, that “We all came from Africa. ..It’s just that I faded out along the way.”

It was also Islam Awareness Week and I got a ticket to the lecture by Dr Jamal Badawi, a scholar on the Holy Qur’an. I was thrilled to learn that ‘jihad’, which in Arabic literally means ‘to exert maximum effort, to strive’, alludes more to an internal battle rather than an actual bloodbath (and true enough it is much harder to fight against one’s own anger than to smash your enemy’s head!). I got goosebumps at the revelation and remembered Mahatma Gandhi. But the debate on pacifism aside, the talk was a refreshing call to re-examine our many misperceptions of the faith.

The week also saw an overwhelming surge of support for Haiti across campus. It was indeed, and continues to be, an expression of com-passion. Seated in the Frederick Wood Theatre for the Help Hear Haiti event, I felt unusually patriotic to be part of UBC (kudos to our fellow students, faculty members and president!). Though struggling with devastating losses and a profound sense of helplessness, many of us still choose to be very much involved on and off-field, ready to engage with the complexities of the crisis.

This week blew me away –it was intense with festivities and grief alike– and I woke up on a Saturday needing to wrap my heart and head around all of it. And I was brought back to the slam poet Shane Koyczan and his piece “This Is My Voice” which we gave a standing ovation to at the UBC Student Leadership Conference. Perhaps his lines sum up this week pretty well –the difficulty of most situations but also the tremendous encouragement we give one another. And I’d like to think that on Sikiliza, the last cultural night of the Africa Awareness Week, some of us danced hard keeping the rest of the troubled world in sincere remembrance.

Categories
Contributions Debatables Videos

The Ethics of Development: Think About It

by Matt Whiteman

A brilliant 4-minute video that was produced by students at the University of British Columbia. It was made for a student-directed seminar supervised by Dr. Shafik Dharamsi on the Ethics of International Development by: Angela Paley, Alice Huang, Stephanie Ngo, and Lucinda Yeung.

https://il.youtube.com/watch?v=zqjPPNObBh4&feature=related

Categories
Contributions Debatables

Sienna Miller in the DRC – 8 minutes. its good. real good.

By Tanja Bergen
I am a student at UBC, working on a student-run, research-based advocacy project (www.acacdrcongo.org), so I thought I’d get your take on this gem: Sienna Miller’s Heart-Wrenching Documentary on Congo Women, “8 minutes” available at: http://www.ecorazzi.com/2009/10/14/watch-sienna-millers-heart-wrenching-documentary-on-congo-women/
Why I bring this to your attention:
1. Grammar: Sienna Miller’s Heart-Wrenching Documentary on Congo Women (Congolese Women? Congo’s Women?)
2. Statement one: when women are raped it is important to know that it is sometimes not only by men but by objects ranging from .. knives, broken bottles (whoa, who knew? In the DRC guns and knives can rape women all on their own!), to the butts of very large rifles (cuz had they been the butts of small rifles.. lame-o)
3. So I am now one minute in (hey its only an 8 minute movie) and I have seen/heard:
a. 1 super pretty and sad blonde lady sharing the stories of african women
b. 1 adequately maimed Congolese women with a subtly horrific scar
c. the super pretty white woman now tells me that that they are all afraid and that they prey that someone, someday, will come
and help them. Re-inforced stereotype of helpless victim – check.
4. armed groups fight for control of these raw minerals … ummm please see IPIS: Mapping Conflict Motives: Eastern DRC – many groups raise their funds by taxing supply routes and by using rape as a weapon to terrorize villages into the militarized control of their land. there hasn’t been a lot of fighting between armed groups for control of these lands over the last year…
5. “RAPE in Eastern Congo is described as the worst in the world” I haven’t heard that one before. I’ve heard it called the worst place in the world to be a woman or a girl – and yes that is because rape and sexual torture is common place relative to many other areas in the world .. but does anyone else find it problematic to rank rapes? Like, oh… you were raped in Rwanda/Darfur/the US etc. well you weren’t raped in the Congo so whats your problem?
6. Time out: Dr. Denis Mukwege (shown on video) and Dr. Jo Lusi (not shown on video but equally awesome) of Panzi Hospital and Heal Africa respectively are probably some of the top 10 awesomest human beings alive. So bask in his awesomeness while he is on.
7. Bah. talking about women as victims? What about as survivors (back to the helpless victim stereotype)
8. Lots of talk about Rwandans.. context given as to genocide? Nada.

Spam prevention powered by Akismet