Categories
Personal Experience

EIESL in Manila

By Chaya Go

In the summer of 2011, EIESL went to Manila, Philippines!

In partnership with IAVE Philippines, I and Ricardo Segovia organised a two-day workshop entitled “In the Name of ‘Helping'” hosted in the College of Saint Benilde. Educators from local high schools and universities who work in implementing the National Service Training Programme (NSTP), a nationwide promotion of volunteerism among Filipino youth, were invited to participate. They came to learn about EIESL’s work in UBC, and together we explored the six learning themes to brainstorm on how these can be incorporated into their work with their students.

Many of the activities we designed for this workshop were inspired by EIESL’s Global Praxis Workshops. Ricardo and I selected images, questions and quotations to display for an “Art Walk” wherein participants were given time to view the visuals and write their reflections and responses to them. Many of the teachers requested for these images to be shared online so they can revisit them even after the workshop. One of our participants has written to tell us that he has now made his own “Art Walk” too to guide his grade school students’ reflections on volunteerism! As a Filipina, I have helped put these visuals together knowing that these speak to the work of Filipino educators and volunteers –but I share these with everyone, knowing we can all find ourselves in these photographs.

Categories
Personal Experience

Reports from the Field – Connecting with the Women’s Advocacy Network (WAN) | ACAC

The first in a series of blog posts by ACAC director Tanja Bergen, on her recent trip to Gulu, Uganda. Tanja will explore what investing locally actually means to local groups. See here.

Categories
Personal Experience Poetry

Inverted sonnet reconsidering travel by rail to Kampala

By Matt Whiteman

Eldoret, Kenya | July 2011

A lone nearby cookfire slow-roasting maize
Glows unaware of an impending blaze.

“Sorry,” says the foreman from his recline
As I leave his office, cluttered and dim,
“But passenger trains don’t run on this line”;
Good stories of little matter to him,

When sixty-tonne rail cars yearning for flight,
Leave their old rails at the small station’s quay,
Spill crude ‘tween parallel tracks and ignite
These rivers, just spitting distance away.

That thunder, dust and impossible stink
Resign my desire to get there by train
But despite all this, I can’t help but think:
What are the odds it could happen again?

 

Categories
Personal Experience

Dispatches: Notes from the Field (Part 1)

By Matt Whiteman

May 12, 2011 – An Episode of Moral Distress

Eldoret, Uasin Gishu, Kenya

What do you do when you witness something you believe to be unethical, but feel powerless to intervene?

In Eldoret today, as I am on my way back to campus after a meeting in town, I stop to listen to a man with a microphone shouting at a large gathering of people standing around him on a dusty street corner. I have passed by these kinds of episodes countless times but never participated and I almost continue on my way today, as though it were any other day, when I remind myself that it is late in the afternoon and I have nowhere to be. Why not, I say to myself.

When I join the crowd, many heads turn to look at me. They probably don’t often see a well-dressed white fellow with a beard at this kind of event. There is terrible microphone feedback, and the orator doesn’t seem to understand that it is caused by him standing too close to the speakers. Behind him there is a table covered in boxes and glass bottles of various shapes and sizes. There is another man and a woman standing quietly behind and next to this table, and behind them there are two big petrol trucks parked in a “V” formation, unrelated to the event, but nevertheless forming the back wall of the “stage”. Spread out on the dirt, there are a number of laminated newspaper articles held down by stones or empty glass bottles as paperweights. The red laterite soil that works its way into everything makes the pages look old and battered. They are all related in one way or another to health, but the headlines of the articles within range of me seem pseudo-scientific. Not wanting to draw too much attention to myself, I refrain from whipping out my notebook to take notes, and by the time I am far enough away that I feel I can do so, the specific titles have escaped me. As I recall they seem to draw some pretty suspicious causal connections between this behaviour and that condition, and seem to be of a calibre only marginally above the National Inquirer.

The man with the microphone paces around energetically, picking up various objects, gesturing dramatically, and asking individuals in the crowd to speak into the mic, reading from various packages and papers to confirm the things he says. He speaks in Swahili, and very quickly, I can only catch bits and pieces, but something makes me uneasy about his sermon. After a minute or two, he lobs a greeting my way, “ey, mzungu! How are you?” – confident and with a distinct tone of mistrust and hostility. He adds something I can’t catch that makes the audience laugh, I suspect to make me feel awkward so that I will leave.

This is something I am used to. My first night in Nairobi watching the 9 o’clock news, there was a story about how the new constitution provides press protection so that journalists could protect their sources of information – this amid a general climate of press problems of various kinds. Although there are some fairly strong media outlets in Kenya, some people are still used to bullying others into misreporting the news or looking the other way. Although I am not a journalist, I stay, not dissuaded by being made the centre of attention. I reply to the man in Swahili, perhaps so that he will think that I can understand him perfectly and will therefore be more careful about what he says. I realize I have just become a witness. I suddenly become very aware of myself witnessing something that feels unethical.

I arrive as the man is in the middle of a demonstration of what looks like birth control pills (I catch him saying that there is one for every day of the week so that you don’t have to keep track). He shows the crowd that the pills are multi-layered, rubbing some water over one in the palm of his hand to show that it had a coating which comes off.

I remember in 2008 driving past a huge gathering of Maasai in a field in Northern Tanzania, and someone standing on a wooden crate at the front of the crowd screaming passages from the Bible at them in the Maasai language. I recall feeling very angry, as the Maasai have, I’m told, in large part resisted outside cultural influences. This was the way the man now demonstrates the use of birth control. So although this is his manner of speaking, it appears as though perhaps he is trying to normalize this method of family planning, something much in need in the fastest growing city in Kenya, so initially I give him the benefit of the doubt.

He then picks up a glass bottle of translucent, bright green liquid from the table, in what looks like it had once been a mickey (375ml bottle) of liquor. I can see that there is a layer of plastic wrap poking out from under the cap, I assume to simulate a seal on the reused bottle. I lose much of what he says at this point, but this immediately looks and feels more suspicious. There are boxes of these bottles amid the clutter in front of the table, and as he speaks, his assistants start passing out bottles to the crowd. They charge around 1400 Kenyan shillings per bottle (nearly 17 Canadian dollars, not an insubstantial amount for the average resident of Eldoret). A few people eagerly dig into their pockets and fork over the cash. One man standing in the front row opposite me in the semi-circle opens the bottle right away and pours a dose into the cap. He examines it closely for a moment, and then throws the liquid into the back of his throat. For a moment he stands very still, eyes fixed on the ground as he experiences the taste, and he seems to be searching within himself for an effect. The orator continues to chirp in the background. The man distributing the bottles does not make eye contact with me and subtly but – I believe – intentionally passes me over. When I catch his eye, I gesture that I want to see one of the bottles. When he hands me one and I read the label I have to stifle a snort. The crowd notices this and the man with the microphone pauses to look at me, before carrying on with his shouting. The label reads something like “this herbal remedy will cure (and prevent?) malaria, typhoid, back pain, low libido, premature ejaculation, obesity and arthritis”, among a string of other ailments. This mixed with some wash about spiritual cleanliness and other wholesome nonsense. I hand it back to the assistant, chuckling sarcastically, shaking my head and sighing. Again, I think a number of people notice this. I feel my neck start to burn with anxiety. I wonder what they are thinking.

Now, I have a limited understanding of herbal medicine. I know that there have been studies done demonstrating the effectiveness of certain traditional medicines. And although I am sceptical, I try not to cast things off merely because they don’t fit my paradigm. But I also have a pretty good bullshit detector, and it now it sounds off louder than the man and the hissing feedback. Living a life where I get spam email every day, I am used to realizing that when something sounds too good to be true, it usually is. Perhaps I take for granted that I live in a country where there are strong marketing laws (e.g. the Competition Act for Misleading Advertising and Deceptive Marketing Practices) and a national commission set up to combat false advertising in the media (the Canadian Radio-television Telecommunications Commission), although I suppose neither has much control over what people say in the streets.

I feel the urge to speak up, to say that this man was probably spreading misinformation. I’m not sure what my motivation was. I know I don’t like seeing people get cheated. I have no way of being sure whether they are or not, but that’s the way it seems. I also feel it is unjust to take advantage of things that make people feel vulnerable like their body image or sexual performance. I know we do it all the time with advertising in Canada, but that is mostly passive advertising – this involves a human standing right in front of me that I can actually talk to. I suppose I also assume, rightly or not, that there are better things one could spend money on. I want to ask the crowd to be critical, to demand evidence. I want to say that they are probably being lied to and being swindled out of their money. Moreover, I wonder about the public health implications of all of this. Are they just selling aloe vera and turpentine? If the bottle contains no relevant medicinal ingredients, will people believe they are purchasing a suitable treatment and not change the behaviours responsible for the conditions they (believe they) are suffering from? Could there be a placebo effect? If there are relevant medicinal ingredients, are they present in a high enough concentration to be effective and not contribute to drug resistance? What other issues am I not considering?

I know I cannot not communicate any of this effectively to the crowd; my Swahili is useable, but not that good. And I don’t have a microphone. And in the heat of the moment I am overcome by ridiculous self-doubt – maybe I’m wrong – maybe this stuff really does everything it claims to. And who would listen to me anyway? Would they hear what I had to say or would they scoff at the arrogance of the rich foreigner who believes he knows everything? I don’t have the credentials to be an authority here. Could I cast doubt in people’s minds about the truthfulness of what this man was telling them, or would my actions have the opposite effect? I find myself thinking “Should I write all this down and try to make it news? Would it even matter? Am I just being arrogant or senselessly indignant? Where does this lead?”

I don’t know what to do. It’s not my job to play journalist. Or is it? A visitor is a witness, sometimes willingly and aware, sometimes not. Does that also imply a duty to act on what I witness? In all cases? I have witnessed violence here before: in the street; between adults and children; between men and women and once, through a window in Zanzibar, an episode of domestic violence. Each time I was conflicted by the urge, the sense of duty to intervene and the knowledge that I am usually powerless, I am on someone else’s turf and that perhaps it is none of my business. This is what is known as the bystander effect: the diffusion of responsibility to others, while others do the same, leaving responsibility in the hands of no one. So whose responsibility is global health and human security?

This episode is small, and certainly not as acute as one of those acts of violence; it represents a more chronic issue, and those often fly below the radar and more commonly go unaddressed. Maybe I should be taking notes as visibly as possible. I am here to do research on a completely different subject – I don’t have the appropriate time, training or resources to get involved in this kind of thing and be responsible and effective. Has the time passed? Is this incident just a drop in the bucket? Is that still a good enough reason to act?

I retroactively remember what I try to tell people as part of my last job, that ethics is messy, that in situations like this where there is no certain moral ground on which to stand, that we have to accept and expect lack of closure and all we can do is speak our truth and act for the best.

In the end, I walk away, feeling very angry and helpless.

May 12, 2011 – An Episode of Moral Distress

What do you do when you witness something you believe to be unethical, but feel powerless to intervene?

In Eldoret today, as I am on my way back to campus after a meeting in town, I stop to listen to a man with a microphone shouting at a large gathering of people standing around him on a dusty street corner. I have passed by these kinds of episodes countless times but never participated and I almost continue on my way today, as though it were any other day, when I remind myself that it is late in the afternoon and I have nowhere to be. Why not, I say to myself.

When I join the crowd, many heads turn to look at me. They probably don’t often see a well-dressed white fellow with a beard at this kind of event. There is terrible microphone feedback, and the orator doesn’t seem to understand that it is caused by him standing too close to the speakers. Behind him there is a table covered in boxes and glass bottles of various shapes and sizes. There is another man and a woman standing quietly behind and next to this table, and behind them there are two big petrol trucks parked in a “V” formation, unrelated to the event, but nevertheless forming the back wall of the “stage”. Spread out on the dirt, there are a number of laminated newspaper articles held down by stones or empty glass bottles as paperweights. The red laterite soil that works its way into everything makes the pages look old and battered. They are all related in one way or another to health, but the headlines of the articles within range of me seem pseudo-scientific. Not wanting to draw too much attention to myself, I refrain from whipping out my notebook to take notes, and by the time I am far enough away that I feel I can do so, the specific titles have escaped me. As I recall they seem to draw some pretty suspicious causal connections between this behaviour and that condition, and seem to be of a calibre only marginally above the National Inquirer.

The man with the microphone paces around energetically, picking up various objects, gesturing dramatically, and asking individuals in the crowd to speak into the mic, reading from various packages and papers to confirm the things he says. He speaks in Swahili, and very quickly, I can only catch bits and pieces, but something makes me uneasy about his sermon. After a minute or two, he lobs a greeting my way, “ey, mzungu! How are you?” – confident and with a distinct tone of mistrust and hostility. He adds something I can’t catch that makes the audience laugh, I suspect to make me feel awkward so that I will leave.

This is something I am used to. My first night in Nairobi watching the 9 o’clock news, there was a story about how the new constitution provides press protection so that journalists could protect their sources of information – this amid a general climate of press problems of various kinds. Although there are some fairly strong media outlets in Kenya, some people are still used to bullying others into misreporting the news or looking the other way. Although I am not a journalist, I stay, not dissuaded by being made the centre of attention. I reply to the man in Swahili, perhaps so that he will think that I can understand him perfectly and will therefore be more careful about what he says. I realize I have just become a witness. I suddenly become very aware of myself witnessing something that feels unethical.

I arrive as the man is in the middle of a demonstration of what looks like birth control pills (I catch him saying that there is one for every day of the week so that you don’t have to keep track). He shows the crowd that the pills are multi-layered, rubbing some water over one in the palm of his hand to show that it had a coating which comes off.

I remember in 2008 driving past a huge gathering of Maasai in a field in Northern Tanzania, and someone standing on a wooden crate at the front of the crowd screaming passages from the Bible at them in the Maasai language. I recall feeling very angry, as the Maasai have, I’m told, in large part resisted outside cultural influences. This was the way the man now demonstrates the use of birth control. So although this is his manner of speaking, it appears as though perhaps he is trying to normalize this method of family planning, something much in need in the fastest growing city in Kenya, so initially I give him the benefit of the doubt.

He then picks up a glass bottle of translucent, bright green liquid from the table, in what looks like it had once been a mickey (375ml bottle) of liquor. I can see that there is a layer of plastic wrap poking out from under the cap, I assume to simulate a seal on the reused bottle. I lose much of what he says at this point, but this immediately looks and feels more suspicious. There are boxes of these bottles amid the clutter in front of the table, and as he speaks, his assistants start passing out bottles to the crowd. They charge around 1400 Kenyan shillings per bottle (nearly 17 Canadian dollars, not an insubstantial amount for the average resident of Eldoret). A few people eagerly dig into their pockets and fork over the cash. One man standing in the front row opposite me in the semi-circle opens the bottle right away and pours a dose into the cap. He examines it closely for a moment, and then throws the liquid into the back of his throat. For a moment he stands very still, eyes fixed on the ground as he experiences the taste, and he seems to be searching within himself for an effect. The orator continues to chirp in the background. The man distributing the bottles does not make eye contact with me and subtly but – I believe – intentionally passes me over. When I catch his eye, I gesture that I want to see one of the bottles. When he hands me one and I read the label I have to stifle a snort. The crowd notices this and the man with the microphone pauses to look at me, before carrying on with his shouting. The label reads something like “this herbal remedy will cure (and prevent?) malaria, typhoid, back pain, low libido, premature ejaculation, obesity and arthritis”, among a string of other ailments. This mixed with some wash about spiritual cleanliness and other wholesome nonsense. I hand it back to the assistant, chuckling sarcastically, shaking my head and sighing. Again, I think a number of people notice this. I feel my neck start to burn with anxiety. I wonder what they are thinking.

Now, I have a limited understanding of herbal medicine. I know that there have been studies done demonstrating the effectiveness of certain traditional medicines. And although I am sceptical, I try not to cast things off merely because they don’t fit my paradigm. But I also have a pretty good bullshit detector, and it now it sounds off louder than the man and the hissing feedback. Living a life where I get spam email every day, I am used to realizing that when something sounds too good to be true, it usually is. Perhaps I take for granted that I live in a country where there are strong marketing laws (e.g. the Competition Act for Misleading Advertising and Deceptive Marketing Practices) and a national commission set up to combat false advertising in the media (the Canadian Radio-television Telecommunications Commission), although I suppose neither has much control over what people say in the streets.

I feel the urge to speak up, to say that this man was probably spreading misinformation. I’m not sure what my motivation was. I know I don’t like seeing people get cheated. I have no way of being sure whether they are or not, but that’s the way it seems. I also feel it is unjust to take advantage of things that make people feel vulnerable like their body image or sexual performance. I know we do it all the time with advertising in Canada, but that is mostly passive advertising – this involves a human standing right in front of me that I can actually talk to. I suppose I also assume, rightly or not, that there are better things one could spend money on. I want to ask the crowd to be critical, to demand evidence. I want to say that they are probably being lied to and being swindled out of their money. Moreover, I wonder about the public health implications of all of this. Are they just selling aloe vera and turpentine? If the bottle contains no relevant medicinal ingredients, will people believe they are purchasing a suitable treatment and not change the behaviours responsible for the conditions they (believe they) are suffering from? Could there be a placebo effect? If there are relevant medicinal ingredients, are they present in a high enough concentration to be effective and not contribute to drug resistance? What other issues am I not considering?

I know I cannot not communicate any of this effectively to the crowd; my Swahili is useable, but not that good. And I don’t have a microphone. And in the heat of the moment I am overcome by ridiculous self-doubt – maybe I’m wrong – maybe this stuff really does everything it claims to. And who would listen to me anyway? Would they hear what I had to say or would they scoff at the arrogance of the rich foreigner who believes he knows everything? I don’t have the credentials to be an authority here. Could I cast doubt in people’s minds about the truthfulness of what this man was telling them, or would my actions have the opposite effect? I find myself thinking “Should I write all this down and try to make it news? Would it even matter? Am I just being arrogant or senselessly indignant? Where does this lead?”

I don’t know what to do. It’s not my job to play journalist. Or is it? A visitor is a witness, sometimes willingly and aware, sometimes not. Does that also imply a duty to act on what I witness? In all cases? I have witnessed violence here before: in the street; between adults and children; between men and women and once, through a window in Zanzibar, an episode of domestic violence. Each time I was conflicted by the urge, the sense of duty to intervene and the knowledge that I am usually powerless, I am on someone else’s turf and that perhaps it is none of my business. This is what is known as the bystander effect: the diffusion of responsibility to others, while others do the same, leaving responsibility in the hands of no one. So whose responsibility is global health and human security?

This episode is small, and certainly not as acute as one of those acts of violence; it represents a more chronic issue, and those often fly below the radar and more commonly go unaddressed. Maybe I should be taking notes as visibly as possible. I am here to do research on a completely different subject – I don’t have the appropriate time, training or resources to get involved in this kind of thing and be responsible and effective. Has the time passed? Is this incident just a drop in the bucket? Is that still a good enough reason to act?

I retroactively remember what I try to tell people as part of my last job, that ethics is messy, that in situations like this where there is no certain moral ground on which to stand, that we have to accept and expect lack of closure and all we can do is speak our truth and act for the best.

In the end, I walk away, feeling very angry and helpless.

Categories
Contributions Personal Experience

Diving in: Watery New-Year’s Resolutions

By Sambriddhi Nepal

*** Editor’s Note: Today marks the one year anniversary of the earthquake in Haiti. A minute of silence will be observed at 1:53pm Pacific Time, the exact moment when the 7.0 magnitude quake hit.

Originally, this piece was meant to be about Haiti. Having lived there, I wanted to write through a more personal stand point. I started compiling some information about the most recent events there. The hurricane, cholera, earthquake relief. I gathered some information about aid money, watched videos on a variety of news websites, and read countless magazine articles.. After two weeks, I felt I had immersed myself rather deeply in the murky waters of Haitian politics and international relations. I was all set this weekend to write an article about some views on Haiti and the November 28 elections, when I opened my homepage of BBC on my internet browser and saw the news about Wikileaks.

Reading a bit about that, I tried – and failed – to understand the politically very complex issue that has continued to develop over the past couple of days. After a good forty-five minutes of browsing the web for more information about what these leaks meant, I went back to my BBC homepage to look for more on the Haiti elections.

Naturally, having been immersed in issues of that country for the past three weeks, I was indignant at finding that Haiti did not feature in the top read news on the website that day. Nor did it appear in the top read news on the CNN website, or on the New York Times, or in the Guardian.

My passion about Haiti and the change (or not) that it is going through isn’t necesarrily someone else’s passion. This is obvious enough, but in that moment it struck me as something particularly eye-opening. I had waded into the issue of Haiti, far enough that mostly when I was reading the news, I was looking for news on that particular country. My focus was Haiti, and I didn’t understand why it wasn’t everyone else’s.

This is particularly hypocritical, considering I had neglected, in my ‘Haiti-immersion’ to read about Nepal, or about Burma, or about other issues that I was particularly interested in. For a moment, when the first Wikileaks article appeared on the BBC website, I had dipped my toes into that issue’s murky waters.

This is what the headlines lead us to. This is what I did myself. Minute by minute, hour by hour, day by day; as the headlines change, we focus on transformations happening in our world. We dip our toes. It is difficult, yet necessary, I feel, to take that leap. To dive into the murky waters and immerse ourselves in long term issues and consequences of the minute by minute changes. While the headlines make it easy to forget about the Haitian earthquake that happened nearly 11 months ago, or about the Pakistani floods, people’s immersion into these issues is what keeps them alive.

I’m not usually one to make New Year’s resolutions. I’m very pessimistic about my own ability to keep them. But this year, I’ll make one. I want to immerse myself in one issue. I want to read up on and know as much as I can about Haiti. Somewhere I’ve lived, a country dear to me. As the one-year anniversary of the devastating earthquake comes up, this seems more necessary than ever.

I can’t immerse myself in every issue. But I can educate the world through my immersion. Just as someone else immersed in another issue can educate me about that. Headlines and dipping our toes is important, but it’s the knee-deep ideas that will bring education, and eventually, change.

Categories
Contributions Debatables Personal Experience

To the Beat of a Somewhat Different Drum: a Senior Volunteer’s Perspective

By Hal Whiteman

These are, perhaps, not the usual observations to appear on this blog.  While they are mostly about student volunteers, they are not by one.  Let me nail my volunteer colours to the mast straightaway; I am a semi-retired, short-term volunteer in his 60s, who recently completed a month at a provincial university in southern Vietnam, helping them with their business planning.

I am writing this post at the behest of my son, who suggested that there may be some merit in my offering some thoughts on the performance of student volunteers, with a view to making suggestions as to how their efforts might bear more fruit.  In setting out these views I do not mean to suggest for an instant that my outlook is any wiser or more productive.  Productivity is to a significant extent the luck of the draw; if I had come a couple of months earlier, before a positive change in management in the office I worked with, my work would have had much less effect.  And I’m sure I made my share of gaffes, both cultural and professional, that undercut my contribution.

The volunteers I encountered fall roughly into three categories: long-term volunteers, for whom development assistance is a career; shorter-term volunteers, whose expertise is of specific use to the university; and students who are taking a term or a summer away from studies to volunteer in a variety of capacities.

The long-term volunteers are, to me, the stars among the front-line workers; they are committed and work long hours for little compensation.  They accept that progress will be slow and uneven, and that culture usually, although not always, takes precedence over change.  They are there to help the community build capacity.  Their job is, to them, more than just a job – it is a way of life.

Those like me, older and with specific skills, will succeed or fail depending on three principal factors: how well and how quickly we adapt quickly to culture and circumstances; whether there is a good match between what the organization wants and what we can deliver; and how hard and diligently we work.  Because most of us have a long work experience to draw on, we are better able to take initiative in the absence of specific direction.

Student volunteers bring energy and enthusiasm to their assignments, and like all volunteers, mixed motives.  They sincerely want to help make a better world, they are thrilled at the idea of seeing a different part of it, and they revel at the prospect of  new experiences. They are prepared to do whatever they are asked, whether in their job description or not.  These traits can carry them a long way, but they bring limitations as well.  It’s not that they are here on a lark, but my perception is that most have little sense of or interest in the longer term impact of their presence here, no interest in gauging the success or failure of their mandate.  They are generally not sufficiently motivated (or perhaps confident) to take independent initiative.  Most work short hours, negotiate three-day weekends to go to Saigon or Bangkok, and generally enjoy life.

In part, they are able to do this as a result of complicity on the part of the host organization, which wants them to have the time and opportunity to enjoy the local environment.  I could have done the same.  I don’t mean to suggest that they are insensitive to the different cultural norms here; they dress modestly, behave correctly, include the Vietnamese in some of their activities, and take an interest in the minorities.  But in the end volunteer service will, for most of them, be just another one of life’s experiences, not rooted in any particular view of the world or specific ideas for its betterment.  It will end when their assignment ends.

Without exception, and this may be a personal as much as a generational difference, they are almost completely ahistorical in outlook.  With one exception, the student volunteers I encountered all come from European backgrounds.  Without exception, they know and care little about their own Judeo-Christian, Greco-Roman roots and modes of thought.  Frequently I heard remarks like “their music is really weird” or “I don’t understand how they can eat dog”.  Thus we often judge the customs and traditions of others without recognizing our own cultural biases.    A more serious shortcoming I have come across in many places, including Vietnam, is the assumption that easy smiles are tokens of happiness amid the most desperate circumstances (“Well, they may be incredibly poor, but they seem quite content”).  Ignored is the fact that they may lack clean drinking water or functional literacy.  There is a failure to recognize that we easily confuse happiness (a dominant western value) with acceptance (predominant in eastern and other societies).

So our western heritage is a closed book to many student volunteers, one which they have no interest in opening.  Asia and Africa offer a different cultural experience, with sights, sounds, tastes, smells that take them beyond their normal lives without requiring them to examine their assumptions about what they are experiencing.  Europe is old, fusty, expensive, and in these days when travel to developing countries is increasingly easy, perhaps a bit intimidating.  I always remind myself that if I don’t know who I am, culturally speaking, I will have a diminished ability to understand and appreciate the culture of others.  And I’m quite sure that I am often guilty of unrecognized cultural judgments.

In themselves, these are not unmanageable problems.  Many parts of the university where I was stationed lack the capability to provide better direction, so it is hard to expect young volunteers without significant management experience to do better.

A more serious concern is, in my view, a failure to recognize adequately their duty of care.  Someone is footing the bill to put them in the field, and the host organization devotes considerable time and effort to supporting them.  Vietnamese for the most part set an excellent example, working long hours for low pay, and taking evening and weekend classes in order to improve their qualifications.  One wonders when we go home how our hosts judge us as workers.

I should stress that my perceptions of student volunteers may be unrepresentative, as they are based on observations covering a few weeks in one location.  I did, however, also seek the views of a number of long-term volunteers, who by and large confirmed these impressions.

I hesitate to offer definitive advice on how to behave in the field.  It’s certainly not reasonable to expect student volunteers to have management experience or judgment which is normally acquired over the span of a career.  But tentatively I would suggest that any short-term volunteer, whether a greybeard like me or a student, should ask themselves five questions as a way of deciding how to behave in the field:

  1. Am I honouring the ideal of international service-learning in a way that recognizes the contribution, financial and otherwise, of others who have put me in the field and are supporting me while there?
  2. Do I think about when to act in full conformity with local customs, counterproductive as they may be, and when to resist them (as sensitively as possible) because they don’t produce transfer of knowledge or building of capacity, which are really what westerners can provide.
  3. How do I balance knowledge transfer against capacity building – when is a stony silence, a function of language problems, when a problem with concept and when a failure to engage, and how do I decide on the best strategy?
  4. What can I learn from other volunteers?  Perhaps I am overly sensitive on this point, but without exception the student volunteers when with me failed what a young friend of mine calls “the question test”.  I was always careful to ask them about their background and work in Vietnam, partly in friendship but also to help me understand how to be a better volunteer. Without exception, they did not ask me a single thing about my own experience, although I have learned certain lessons over my career that could have helped them deal with some of the obstacles they face.  In other circumstances this would not trouble me.  We are two generations apart in age, and they have their own lives to live and their own interests to cultivate.  But as an anonymous French medievalist wrote “the advice of the old is like the winter sun: it sheds light but does not warm us.”  Perhaps those like me can shed some light that would enrich the student volunteer experience.
  5. How can I continue to be helpful beyond the end of my mandate?  It is one thing to keep in contact for purposes of friendship; it is something else altogether to continue to help once you are home.  In any educational institution, real change takes a long time to occur, and requires extended effort to sustain.  That friendship can be much richer and more valuable if it is based not only on personal affection but also on continuing professional support.

The future of international service learning lies with today’s student volunteers: you have the time, resources, intelligence and education to make a difference over the long term.  Use them well.

Categories
Contributions Personal Experience

We Have Much to be Thankful For

By Sambriddhi Nepal

Walking into Shree JanaUdaya Lower Secondary School in Kathmandu having spent the year abroad at one of the best universities in the world, I was immediately struck by how lucky I am. The building wasn’t painted, there was mud surrounding the gates of the school, and the classrooms’ windows had no glass or screens on them. I could only imagine the itchy mosquito bites the children must have, and the inescapable cold they faced in the winter.

There was a rush of commotion as the students, who knew of our arrival as volunteers, came running out of their classes to wave and say “hello,” something any Nepali – from the innocent vendor on a street to the creepy men staring at you – will say to a foreigner.

The second thought that came to mind was how these children were smiling more than most people I meet abroad. This is amazing considering the burdens they face, being from poor working class families. They waved and the brave ones came up to us to practice their English, something they rarely get to do. When they found out I was Nepali, the first thing they asked me was my last name, so that they could know which caste I was from. I wasn’t surprised. Our country is secular only by name. The stigmas of the caste system still remain.

We went inside the Principal’s office to talk to him about what we had planned for the coming week. I asked him about the school’s library and again wasn’t surprised to hear him say that they were ‘planning on organizing the library.’ Typical. All talk. We asked to see the library. I was again not surprised to see that it was a big mess. The school had been donated literally thousands of books from other schools and organizations such as Room to Read. However, they weren’t being put to use. I couldn’t help but think of the hundreds of other schools in Kathmandu whose ‘libraries’ looked exactly the same.

The two other volunteers and I told him our plan: we could clean up the library, organize the books, and would come back later to make sure that the library was being used properly. The principal mentioned that he had ‘planned’ on putting carpets in the room, and that the carpeting would be done by tomorrow.

We returned the next day and were surprised to see the carpets in place in both the library and the reading room (which was right next to the library). We set to work immediately. For the next two days, we worked on organizing the books, getting rid of ones that were not suitable for low-level English speakers, and we bought some more books for the library so that we could have more colorful, exciting books for the children.

All this while, the children, curious as they are, would come up to the windows of the reading room and watch us working. Smiling occasionally and some would bravely come up and talk to us about what we were doing. I asked one girl her name, and when she said it was Kaavya, I remembered with a jolt that she was a student who had been receiving a scholarship from the NGO I had been working for. I had read about her parents, who were from a low caste and did not have good jobs, and about her 4 siblings and how her eldest brother was working as a laborer to provide for the family. To see this girl in person and have a face to the student profile I had written in the comfort of my office brought tears to my eyes.

The last day of our volunteering, I walked into the school and a smiling young girl in the 7th grade gave me a flower, which I immediately put in my hair. Later, that girl came into the library, which was now open for the students and smiled brightly when she saw that I was still wearing the flower in my hair. She found so much joy in so little a thing.

The library had been set up, as had the reading room. The bravest 10 students walked in and immediately picked out books and began to read. They shared stories and talked about the pictures in the books. As we took pictures of them, they barely seemed to notice. They were so wrapped up in their books and sharing stories with the students.

My happiness at being there was tainted a bit by one of the other two volunteers I was working with, who insisted that we have one of the students pose with a book so we could have ‘a good PR photo.’ I said nothing, but would have much preferred to not be taking pictures at all rather than having a posed picture.

I sat with that little girl, who turned out to be a 2nd grader and read a Nepali book with her for a little bit, and when we walked down to the courtyard hand in hand, her friends joined me. The other little girls insisted that I return another day and read more books with them. When I promised I would, one of the girls said “that’s what you say now, but you probably won’t even come back.” This made me want to cry again – yes, I did that a lot throughout this week – as I wondered what kind of promises had been made to them before that hadn’t been kept. I showed them a pinky promise, and promised I’d be back.

I’ll mentally prepare myself better next time, and go back to the school aiming only for smiles this time.

Categories
Contributions Debatables Personal Experience

Negotiating for an Ethical Middle Ground

By Yan Xu

A week ago, I sat in on a meeting where one of the topics of discussion was an organization (student-driven, new organization, grassroots, etc) that works with communities in Kenya, promoting HIV/AIDS awareness that wanted to collaborate with a club that I am part of.

What went through in my mind was the following: Come on, can they or do they plan to teach their communities anything other than using safe contraceptives? Do these people need to fund-raise, fly all the way over to Kenya and tell people there to abstain from high-risk behaviours for HIV transmission?

Of course, I, intending to tell the members of the executive committee to consider the capacity of science undergrad students to inform Kenyans half a world away, said something to the effect of “what can a bunch of Microbiology students do in a community like that?”  All heads in the room turned to me with shock and dismay, and I immediately stopped, not because I was in complete disagreement from the rest of the group, but because I realized I had crossed a personal boundary.  There I was, effectively denigrating a well-intentioned student group.

For the rest of the day, 3 questions circled my mind:

  1. Have I taken “ethicizing” too far?
  2. Did I belittle the capacity of the student group (almost an unequivocal yes)?
  3. Would a more fruitful approach have been consulting with this group regarding what type of community outreach they were going to do (then if they told me that they were only going to teach the locals how to use contraceptives, would that then justify my reaction, because I went through the process of consultation?)

A good friend astutely mentioned that being involved in ethical dialogue runs the risk of assuming the position of embarrassing superiority, where we consider our moral stance to be somehow higher because we are examining issues that hadn’t been considered by say, the group that sought to collaborate with my club.  Good intentions and careful scrutiny of unintended effects need not oppose each other, but to achieve partnership between the two, we need to first commit to recognizing and validating the good intentions, before we take our theoretical lenses and place one’s well-intended project under the microscope, and recommend how potential barriers to the meaningful change they seek can be overcome.

Categories
Debatables Personal Experience

In Which a Striking Apparition is Witnessed

By Matt Whiteman

Last night, the UBC Chapter of Engineers Without Borders held a screening of Dr. James Orbinski’s harrowing documentary “Triage“. If you haven’t already seen it, do. To my disappointment, only six or seven people showed up to watch, four of which were members of EWB. Quel dommage.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TMPCjy_Arbo[/youtube]

There were indeed many insightful moments, but one in particular stuck out for me that will likely never happen again in quite the same way, so I feel the need to record it here. The film began with Dr. Orbinski explaining the awful process of triage he went through – deciding who lives or dies – during the genocide in Rwanda. This is a process which can only be described as “the ultimate humanitarian nightmare”:

“So we labeled them 1, 2, or 3… put a little piece of tape on their forehead

and ‘1’ meant that they should be treated right away…

a ‘2’ meant that they needed to be treated within 24 hours.

And a ‘3’ meant that even though they were alive, they were irretrievable.”

Imagine this was your decision.

As he spoke, someone in front of me was fiddling with the remote control, trying to bring up subtitles. Immediately after Orbinski said “and a ‘3’”, the picture froze and the words “Cannot Operate” appeared in the centre of the screen.

It was just the DVD player’s way of telling us it didn’t like button-mashing, but there was something hauntingly poetic about this small, perfectly-timed apparition. It wasn’t quite irony; just a simple coincidence with a lump of double entendre. Maybe it’s not even all that interesting. But for me, it set the mood for the rest of the film, which – believe me – was not easy to watch. Even for someone who has never themselves glimpsed the complexity of the things witnessed by Dr. Orbinski, the mood is unmistakably one of pathos.

Among other things, Triage sparks an interesting debate about the role of doctor as political actor. My room mate poignantly noted this morning on the bus that doctors are among the only professionals who are essentially “licensed to be apolitical”. The rest of us aren’t allowed to be, ethically speaking anyway. We have a choice to be apathetic or ignorant, but as human beings, should we be allowed to be?

If you work for Doctors Without Borders (MSF) as a physician, you can’t get involved in the politics of the region. Your job is to treat the sick. Although I am not a doctor, the modern hippocratic oath, along with the spirit of MSF, seem to imply that all human life is equal, and that – like the law – a physician’s compassion should be blind.

Triage examines just how difficult it can be to remain apolitical when the people you are treating are victims of (often infuriating) political circumstance. “Famines,” one man comments “are never simply natural occurrences.” The same truth is reflected in the staggering number of casualties of the recent earthquake in Haiti.

After the genocide in Rwanda ended and 2 million Hutus fled to Uganda and Zaire, the refugee camps were run by the very genocidaires who killed close to a million people.  They appropriated emergency food aid and sold it with a tax markup, allowing them to sustain themselves during a conflict that is ongoing to this day. Humanitarian workers operating in these camps had a choice: work with the genocidaires, or let people starve. But not for Orbinski. MSF had to remain politically neutral, and Orbinski decided that it could not do that while supporting murderers. It left Rwanda in 1997 and has not returned since. The flak that you risk facing in a circumstance like that is that what gets televised is the doctors leaving the camp – not the complex reasons for doing so.

You can just as easily not get involved out of sheer political ignorance too. But the difference between political neutrality and political ignorance is that the former requires a conscious understanding of the politics involved in such a situation so that you can make the right decision. But many physicians, as Ernest Boyer would say, experience a “divorce of conscience from competence” – they retreat into their technical training when they don’t understand a socio-political situation well enough.

This same schism is often characteristic of anyone who wants to help – which is where many of the ethical problems with international engagement begin. I’ve said it so many times I feel almost self-conscious saying it again here, but reliance on good intentions – even with a certain competence – is not enough. Some people have neither conscience nor competence, and yet somehow still show up to “help”.An Imperfect Offering

Sometimes you have to ask tough questions: Are there people who don’t deserve to be helped? It is dilemmas like this that are the subject of Orbinski’s book “An Imperfect Offering”, which Triage documents him writing. The role of doctor as health advocate suggests that physicians must be political creatures, that they must include social and political circumstances in their calculus.

Orbinski understands this and is himself torn by it – he knows that you have to understand the politics before you can step outside them, and that’s why he (representing MSF) was awarded the Nobel Prize in 1999.

Categories
Debatables Personal Experience

Case Study: Chang’aa

By Matt Whiteman

Here is a case study based on an experience I had:

You have been working in a rural community for a few months, and today you are coordinating a basic nutritional survey of the area with the help of a few colleagues. Upon approaching one cluster of huts, you smell an unfamiliar smell. You eventually realize that the occupants of the huts must be brewing a potent alcohol, similar to moonshine. As you approach, they stop what they are doing and look in your direction in silence. You have heard of this practice, but this is the first time you have seen it being made. The beverage is popular, though you know its production to be illegal, as it is unregulated and often contaminated with harmful substances.

You introduce yourself and your team and ask them if they have a few moments to answer some questions. They smile at you, agreeing hesitantly. As you sit down, the man you are about to interview offers you a cup of the pungent brew. What should you do? Maybe think it over a bit before I tell you my perspective.

***

Here are two obvious immediate reactions: 1) Of course, I’m a young adventuresome person with nothing to lose – this is the kind of experience I came here for!  2) Of course not – I don’t know what’s in this and I don’t want to go blind.

Neither of these would have been appropriate in my mind.

There was a more implicit message the man was trying to communicate to me. Though these are only my assumptions, here is the situation as I saw it from his standpoint:

  1. You are a stranger here and I don’t know if I can trust you yet. You’ve just walked in on me doing something illegal (though I don’t know if you care or not). If you drink from this cup, then you will be just as culpable as we are and we can’t get in trouble. I can then trust you and be more open with you, both now and in the future. You will get the data you need for your survey and your work will go smoothly.
  2. If you don’t drink it, then I will still answer your questions, but I will give you minimal information and remain suspicious of you, and maybe I’ll tell others that you can’t be trusted.

From my perspective:

  1. This has implications for my professional reputation, as my colleagues are with me and have expectations of me. However, I know that this will likely create a bit of social distance that may have repercussions for my work later on.
  2. I am comfortable with trying new things, but I am not really comfortable with breaking the law in order to facilitate the work I am doing, even if it would be great to try something new, even though it would make a great story, even if my actions may be fairly harmless.
  3. I am also a representative of my country and my organization and I can’t really be seen setting a bad example, nor is it acceptable to establish or reinforce a negative stereotype.
  4. My relationship with this community matters a significant deal, not only to me, but to future cohorts of volunteers who will pick up where I leave off.

Keep in mind that chang’aa is a lone source of income for some families in this area where their land is not suitable for cultivation of crops or animal husbandry. With HIV/AIDS having affected a significant portion of the men of working age, this is one of the only forms of employment that women can hold out of their homes.

I didn’t end up taking the cup. Fortunately, my colleagues, who were members of a neighbouring community, seemed to be able to smooth things over fairly well and I think we saved face just fine, although they spoke a regional language I wasn’t familiar with, so I’ll never know for sure.

Spam prevention powered by Akismet