off the top of my head, I can ramble on jargon of adjectives that politicans may throw out there to seem progressive through the eyes of democracy. Concepts such as “neo-democracy” or “military democracy.” or “conservative democracy.” Arguably, I feel as though these are filler words to distract the public into thinking we live in a democratic set up…So I guess the question of the course is; how functional is our democratic adjectives… and are they tangible reality we can see.
When I read Collier and Levitsky, the terminology I derive, is conceptual democracy… but its exactly that. A concept, not a real political example. Honestly, it still doesn’t make sense to me. Procedural democracy, meaning the concepts of political procedures found in democracy… but no execution of democratic procedures.
Here is one example of a concept of democracy, no proof if it was executed in society though. “Direct Democracy”
http://www.abc.net.au/civics/democracy/concepts.htm#direct
This next concept of democracy “Interactive Democracy” is where citizens interact via technology to “better” the democratic state through suggestions. Anyone can suggest a policy.
http://interactivedemocracy.blogspot.ca/