{"id":12,"date":"2016-06-19T17:26:09","date_gmt":"2016-06-20T00:26:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/gult\/?page_id=12"},"modified":"2016-08-14T02:01:06","modified_gmt":"2016-08-14T09:01:06","slug":"learning-theories","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/gult\/learning-theories\/","title":{"rendered":"Learning Theories"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>To design a framework incorporating all the theories, one needs to understand each theory in depth, its philosophy, focus, its primary audience. Only then can one connect the dots and visualize a coherent picture weaving together the different learning theories. Following is a brief description of the various learning theories currently in practice. Please click on the \u2018read more\u2019 button for reading in details.<\/p>\n<p><b>Behaviourism<\/b><strong>:<\/strong> Endorsed by B.F. Skinner, John Watson (1878\u20131958), van Pavlov (1849\u20131936), Edward Thorndike (1874\u20131949) among others, explained human and animal behavior regarding external physical stimuli, responses, learning histories, and (for certain types of behavior) reinforcements. It claims that people have no free will \u2013 a person\u2019s environment determines their behavior. We learn new behavior through conditioning. Thus learners are passive and can be trained to display favorable behaviors through reinforcements, practice, and external motivation. The learner is expected to progress in a linear quantitative fashion where the progress made by the learner is measured by observing behaviors on predetermined tasks (Fosnot, 2013).<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" width=\"750\" height=\"422\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/KYDYzR-ZWRQ?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/plato.stanford.edu\/entries\/behaviorism\/\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-203 aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/gult\/files\/2016\/06\/Read-more.png\" alt=\"Read more\" width=\"181\" height=\"54\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/gult\/files\/2016\/06\/Read-more.png 1100w, https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/gult\/files\/2016\/06\/Read-more-300x89.png 300w, https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/gult\/files\/2016\/06\/Read-more-768x228.png 768w, https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/gult\/files\/2016\/06\/Read-more-1024x304.png 1024w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 181px) 100vw, 181px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Cognitivism:<\/strong> In the late 1950s, learning theory began to make a shift away from the use of behavioral learning models to understanding more complex cognitive processes such as thinking, problem-solving, language, concept formation and information processing (Snelbecker, 1983). Cognitive theories focus on the conceptualization of students\u2019 learning processes and address the issues of how information is received, organized, stored, and retrieved by the mind. Learning is concerned not so much with <strong>what<\/strong> learners \u2018do\u2019 but with what they know and <strong>how<\/strong> they come to acquire it (Jonassen, 1991). Cognitivism, like behaviorism, emphasizes the role that environmental conditions play in facilitating learning. Instructional explanations, demonstrations, illustrative examples and matched non-examples are all considered to be instrumental in guiding student learning. Additional key elements include the way that learners attend to, code, transform, rehearse, store and retrieve information. Students\u2019 thoughts, beliefs, attitudes, and values are also considered to be influential in the learning process (Winne, 1985).<\/p>\n<div data-canvas-width=\"484.55699999999996\">\n<div data-canvas-width=\"487.08083333333326\">\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" width=\"750\" height=\"422\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/gugvpoU2Ewo?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.uwplatt.edu\/files\/ttc\/idarticle.pdf\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-203\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/gult\/files\/2016\/06\/Read-more.png\" alt=\"Read more\" width=\"181\" height=\"54\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/gult\/files\/2016\/06\/Read-more.png 1100w, https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/gult\/files\/2016\/06\/Read-more-300x89.png 300w, https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/gult\/files\/2016\/06\/Read-more-768x228.png 768w, https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/gult\/files\/2016\/06\/Read-more-1024x304.png 1024w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 181px) 100vw, 181px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Maturationism:<\/strong> Actively endorsed by Arnold Gessel(1931), maturationism is an early childhood educational philosophy that sees the child as a growing organism and believes that the role of education is to support this growth passively rather than actively fill the child with information. This theory maintains that children mature as they grow older. Personalities and temperament will be revealed with little influence from the surrounding environment. From a maturationist\u2019s perspective, children\u2019s environments should be adapted to their already genetically determined needs and characteristics.<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/schoolbag.info\/pedagogy\/early\/173.html\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-203\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/gult\/files\/2016\/06\/Read-more.png\" alt=\"Read more\" width=\"181\" height=\"54\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/gult\/files\/2016\/06\/Read-more.png 1100w, https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/gult\/files\/2016\/06\/Read-more-300x89.png 300w, https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/gult\/files\/2016\/06\/Read-more-768x228.png 768w, https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/gult\/files\/2016\/06\/Read-more-1024x304.png 1024w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 181px) 100vw, 181px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Constructivism: <\/strong>Constructivism is endorsed actively by Piaget, Vygotsky, Bruner, Von Glasersfeld. According to both behavioral and cognitive theories, \u00a0the world is real, external to the learner. The goal of instruction is to map the structure of the world onto the student (Jonassen, 1991). However, constructivism is a theory that equates learning with creating meaning from experience. Constructivists do not deny the existence of the real world but contend that what we know of the world stems from our interpretations of our experiences. Humans create meaning as opposed to acquiring it. Both learner and environmental factors are critical to the constructivist, as it is the specific interaction between these two variables that creates knowledge. Piaget proposed a theory of assimilation and accommodation where, when the learner\u2019s existing mental models are disturbed by new experiences or information, then learner tries to accommodate the new understanding in the existing schema, thereby leading to learning. Social constructivism is a variant of constructivism which focuses on social interaction as a cause of meaning making. For constructivists, learning is not the result of development; learning is development (Fosnot, 2013).<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" width=\"750\" height=\"422\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/Xa59prZC5gA?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<div data-canvas-width=\"485.04941666666656\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.uwplatt.edu\/files\/ttc\/idarticle.pdf\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-203\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/gult\/files\/2016\/06\/Read-more.png\" alt=\"Read more\" width=\"181\" height=\"54\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/gult\/files\/2016\/06\/Read-more.png 1100w, https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/gult\/files\/2016\/06\/Read-more-300x89.png 300w, https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/gult\/files\/2016\/06\/Read-more-768x228.png 768w, https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/gult\/files\/2016\/06\/Read-more-1024x304.png 1024w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 181px) 100vw, 181px\" \/><\/a><\/div>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Constructionism:\u00a0<\/strong>Developed by Seymour Papert, in his words, \u201cConstructionism shares constructivism&#8217;s view of learning as \u201cbuilding knowledge structures\u201d through the progressive internalization of actions. It then adds the idea that this happens especially felicitously in a context where the learner is consciously engaged in constructing a public entity, whether it\u2019s a sand castle on the beach or a theory of the universe\u201d (Ackermann, 2016). Papert claims that \u201cdiving into\u201d situations rather than looking at them from a distance and the connectedness rather than separation, are powerful means of gaining understanding. Becoming one with the phenomenon under study is, in his view, a key to learning. Thus, situated and problem-based learning is an important part of constructionism. Papert\u2019s constructionism focuses more on the art of learning, or \u2018learning to learn\u2019, and on the significance of making things in learning.<\/p>\n<div data-canvas-width=\"264.9619999999999\">\n<div data-canvas-width=\"324.2939999999999\">https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=U5mHFzJ7CSg<\/div>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/learning.media.mit.edu\/content\/publications\/EA.Piaget%20_%20Papert.pdf\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-203\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/gult\/files\/2016\/06\/Read-more.png\" alt=\"Read more\" width=\"181\" height=\"54\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/gult\/files\/2016\/06\/Read-more.png 1100w, https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/gult\/files\/2016\/06\/Read-more-300x89.png 300w, https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/gult\/files\/2016\/06\/Read-more-768x228.png 768w, https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/gult\/files\/2016\/06\/Read-more-1024x304.png 1024w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 181px) 100vw, 181px\" \/><\/a><strong>Connectivism<\/strong>: Proposed by Siemens and Downes, connectivism is a theory for 21st-century learning. Siemens claims that learning is no longer an individualistic activity. Knowledge is distributed across networks. In our digital society, the connections and connectedness within networks leads to learning. Siemens argues that a central tenet of most learning theories is that learning occurs inside a person. However, these theories do not address learning that occurs outside of people (i.e. learning that is stored and manipulated by technology). He specifically questions how does learning theory change when information storage, processing, and recall are off-loaded onto devices and through networked connections? \u00a0In the brain, knowledge is distributed through connections between different regions of the brain and in the networks we form (social and technological) knowledge is distributed through connections between individuals, groups, and devices (Siemens, 2006).<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" width=\"750\" height=\"422\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/yx5VHpaW8sQ?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.itdl.org\/journal\/jan_05\/article01.htm\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-203\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/gult\/files\/2016\/06\/Read-more.png\" alt=\"Read more\" width=\"181\" height=\"54\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/gult\/files\/2016\/06\/Read-more.png 1100w, https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/gult\/files\/2016\/06\/Read-more-300x89.png 300w, https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/gult\/files\/2016\/06\/Read-more-768x228.png 768w, https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/gult\/files\/2016\/06\/Read-more-1024x304.png 1024w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 181px) 100vw, 181px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Phenomenology:<\/strong> Phenomenology is actively endorsed by Edmund Husserl. By employing our experiences of perception, thought, memory, imagination, emotion, desire, and volition, Phenomenology studies the intentional structures of consciousness. The goal of phenomenology\u2019s intentionality is to develop: \u2026 a complex account of temporal awareness (within the stream of consciousness), spatial awareness (notably in perception), attention (distinguishing focal and marginal or \u201chorizontal\u201d awareness), awareness of one\u2019s own experience (self-consciousness, in one sense), self-awareness (awareness of oneself), the self in different roles (as thinking, acting, etc.), embodied action (including kinesthetic awareness of one\u2019s movement), intention in action (more or less explicit), awareness of other persons (empathy, intersubjectivity, collectivity), linguistic activity (involving meaning, communication, understanding others), social interaction (including collective action), and everyday activity in our surrounding life-world (in particular culture).<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/plato.stanford.edu\/entries\/phenomenology\/\"><br \/>\n<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-203\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/gult\/files\/2016\/06\/Read-more.png\" alt=\"Read more\" width=\"181\" height=\"54\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/gult\/files\/2016\/06\/Read-more.png 1100w, https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/gult\/files\/2016\/06\/Read-more-300x89.png 300w, https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/gult\/files\/2016\/06\/Read-more-768x228.png 768w, https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/gult\/files\/2016\/06\/Read-more-1024x304.png 1024w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 181px) 100vw, 181px\" \/><\/a><br \/>\n<strong>Neuroscience: <\/strong>While neuroscience is an emerging field with a vastly changing landscape, few neuroscientific findings have been shown to be fundamental to the way we think and learn. Formation of interconnections between nerve cells has been central to how learning takes place. \u00a0In 1949, Hebb proposed a principle that \u201cWhen two neurons fire together the synapses are altered through growth and they will tend to be wired together\u201d (p. 11). Hence, Hebb coined the phrase, \u201cneurons that fire together wire together.\u201d With the progress of advanced imaging technologies, we have made tremendous progress in understanding what happens at a neurobiological level when learning occurs and how it differs with different factors.<br \/>\n<strong><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/plato.stanford.edu\/entries\/phenomenology\/http:\/\/www.pageuppeople.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/06\/Neuroscience-of-Learning-and-Development1.pdf\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-203\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/gult\/files\/2016\/06\/Read-more.png\" alt=\"Read more\" width=\"181\" height=\"54\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/gult\/files\/2016\/06\/Read-more.png 1100w, https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/gult\/files\/2016\/06\/Read-more-300x89.png 300w, https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/gult\/files\/2016\/06\/Read-more-768x228.png 768w, https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/gult\/files\/2016\/06\/Read-more-1024x304.png 1024w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 181px) 100vw, 181px\" \/><\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">This\u00a0concept map may help us understand the connections between different learning theories. For a better quality please click on the image and it will zoom in and out.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/davidwees.com\/sites\/default\/files\/DavidWeesLearningTheories.jpg\u00a0\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-76\" title=\"https:\/\/davidwees.com\/sites\/default\/files\/DavidWeesLearningTheories.jpg\u00a0\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/gult\/files\/2016\/06\/DavidWeesLearningTheories-300x183.jpg\" alt=\"DavidWeesLearningTheories\" width=\"795\" height=\"485\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/gult\/files\/2016\/06\/DavidWeesLearningTheories-300x183.jpg 300w, https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/gult\/files\/2016\/06\/DavidWeesLearningTheories-768x468.jpg 768w, https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/gult\/files\/2016\/06\/DavidWeesLearningTheories-1024x624.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/gult\/files\/2016\/06\/DavidWeesLearningTheories.jpg 1200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 795px) 100vw, 795px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000080;\"><strong>Activity 3:\u00a0Please choose any one theory of your choice and \u00a0analyze it. Post a brief note about its strengths and limitations and when could it be best used. \u00a0<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" style=\"padding: 0; margin: 0; border: none;\" src=\"https:\/\/padlet.com\/embed\/wxz26jx1s21g\" width=\"100%\" height=\"480px\" frameborder=\"0\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<div style=\"border-top: 2px solid #a7d23a; padding: 8px; margin: 0; font-size: 12px; text-align: right;\"><a style=\"color: #41555f; text-decoration: none;\" href=\"http:\/\/padlet.com\">Created with Padlet<img decoding=\"async\" style=\"margin: 0 0 0 10px; padding: 0; border: none; width: 16px; height: 16px;\" src=\"http:\/\/padlet.com\/favicon.ico\" \/><\/a><\/div>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/gult\/instructional-strategies\/\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright wp-image-686\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/gult\/files\/2016\/06\/Slide2-1-300x225.jpg\" alt=\"Slide2\" width=\"140\" height=\"105\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/gult\/files\/2016\/06\/Slide2-1-300x225.jpg 300w, https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/gult\/files\/2016\/06\/Slide2-1.jpg 720w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 140px) 100vw, 140px\" \/><\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/gult\/why-gult\/\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-685\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/gult\/files\/2016\/06\/Slide1-2-300x225.jpg\" alt=\"Slide1\" width=\"140\" height=\"105\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/gult\/files\/2016\/06\/Slide1-2-300x225.jpg 300w, https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/gult\/files\/2016\/06\/Slide1-2.jpg 720w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 140px) 100vw, 140px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">_____________________________________________________________________________<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>References\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span id=\"js-reference-string-1\" class=\"selectable\">Ackermann, E. (2016). <i>Piaget\u2019s Constructivism, Papert\u2019s Constructionism: What\u2019s the difference?<\/i> (1st ed., pp. 1-11). MIT Media Labs. Retrieved from http:\/\/learning.media.mit.edu\/content\/publications\/EA.Piaget%20_%20Papert.pdf<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span id=\"js-reference-string-0\" class=\"selectable\">Ertmer, P. &amp; Newby, T. (2008). Behaviorism, Cognitivism, Constructivism: Comparing Critical Features from an Instructional Design Perspective. <i>Performance Improvement Quarterly<\/i>, <i>6<\/i>(4), 50-72. http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1937-8327.1993.tb00605.x<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span id=\"js-reference-string-1\" class=\"selectable\">Fosnot, Catherine Twomey. <em>Constructivism: Theory, Perspectives, and Practice, Second Edition<\/em> (Kindle Locations 779-780). Teachers College Press. Kindle Edition.<\/span><br \/>\n<span class=\"selectable\"><br \/>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<div data-canvas-width=\"265.42400000000004\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN-US\" xml:lang=\"EN-US\">Gesell, A. (1931). Maturation and the patterning of behavior. In C. Murchison ed., <em>A handbook of child psychology<\/em>. Worcester, MA: Clark University Press;<\/span><\/div>\n<div data-canvas-width=\"265.42400000000004\"><\/div>\n<div data-canvas-width=\"265.42400000000004\"><span id=\"js-reference-string-3\" class=\"selectable\">Jonassen, D. (1991). Objectivism versus constructivism: Do we need a new philosophical paradigm?. <i>ETR&amp;D<\/i>, <i>39<\/i>(3), 5-14. http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1007\/bf02296434<\/span><\/div>\n<p><span id=\"js-reference-string-4\" class=\"selectable\"><br \/>\nSiemens, G. (2006). Connectivism: Learning theory or pastime for the self-amused? [Electronic Version]. <em>elearnspace<\/em>, 1-43. Retrieved September 9, 2007, from http:\/\/www.elearnspace.org\/Articles\/connectivism_self-amused.htm<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span id=\"js-reference-string-2\" class=\"selectable\">Snelbecker, G. (1974). <i>Learning theory, instructional theory, and psychoeducational design<\/i>. New York: McGraw-Hill.<\/span><\/p>\n<div data-canvas-width=\"265.42400000000004\"><span id=\"js-reference-string-3\" class=\"selectable\">Winne, P. (1985). Steps toward Promoting Cognitive Achievements. <i>The Elementary School Journal<\/i>, <i>85<\/i>(5), 673-693. http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1086\/461429<\/span><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>To design a framework incorporating all the theories, one needs to understand each theory in depth, its philosophy, focus, its primary audience. Only then can one connect the dots and visualize a coherent picture weaving together the different learning theories. Following is a brief description of the various learning theories currently in practice. Please click [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":28824,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-12","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/gult\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/12","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/gult\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/gult\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/gult\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/28824"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/gult\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12"}],"version-history":[{"count":51,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/gult\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/12\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":809,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/gult\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/12\/revisions\/809"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/gult\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}