All the topics mentioned under the ‘GULT in action’ section fall under the ‘practice, extend and perform’ phase of the 4mat cycle. Following is a rubric that you can use to assess your own lesson plans. If you find yourself falling short on any of the parameters, kindly refer to the original reference material mentioned under ‘references’ to gain a better understanding of the same. If you need further help or clarification or personalized feedback, kindly leave a comment on the Padlet provided at the end page.<\/p>\n
Activity 6: Please create your own lesson plan on any one topic of your choice in accordance with the GULT framework and based on the 4Mat cycle. Please refer to the statement on lesson plan<\/a> if you feel the need to understand the theoretical viewpoints in detail. Post the link to your lesson plan in the space provided below. You may create the lesson plan in any medium of your choice – presentation, mind maps etc. Visit https:\/\/www.mindmup.com<\/a> for free mindmaps. <\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n\n\n
\n <\/td>\n Excellent (4 points)<\/strong><\/td>\n Very good (3 points)<\/strong><\/td>\n Adequate (2 points)<\/strong><\/td>\n Less than adequate (1 point)<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Incorporation of constructivist foundations<\/td>\n \u00a0The lesson plan fulfills all the 5 criteria of constructivist teaching as mentioned by\u00a0 Baviskar, Hartle and Whitney (2009)<\/td>\n \u00a0The lesson plan fulfills 3-4\u00a0criteria of constructivist teaching<\/td>\n \u00a0 The lesson plan fulfills\u00a0 atleast 3 criteria of constructivist teaching<\/td>\n \u00a0The lesson plan incorporates 2 or less than 2 criteria of constructivist teaching<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n \u00a0Incorporation of other learning theories<\/td>\n \u00a0The lesson plan incorporates elements from at least 5 learning theories which do not contradict each other.<\/td>\n \u00a0The lesson plan incorporates elements from at 3-4 learning theories which do not contradict each other.<\/td>\n \u00a0The lesson plan incorporates elements from at least 3 learning theories which do not contradict each other.<\/td>\n \u00a0The lesson plan incorporates elements from 2 or less than 2 learning theories.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n \u00a0Compliance to the 4mat cycle<\/td>\n \u00a0Lesson plan includes all phases of the 4mat cycle appropriately<\/td>\n \u00a0Lesson plan includes most phases of the 4mat cycle.<\/td>\n \u00a0Lesson plan includes very few phases of the 4mat cycle<\/td>\n \u00a0Lesson plan does not follow the 4mat cycle<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Assessment and feedback<\/td>\n \u00a0Both summative and formative assessment. Feedback follows the criteria set by Hattie and Timperley (2007)<\/td>\n \u00a0Both summative and formative assessment. Feedback provided for at least 2 of the 3 cases.<\/td>\n \u00a0Both summative and formative assessment.\u00a0 Feedback provided only for 1 of the 3 cases.<\/td>\n \u00a0Only summative assessment. Assessment with the intent of testing rather than feedback.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n