![\"\"](\"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/ices\/files\/2020\/03\/2020-04-02-EDCP-public-seminar-scaled.jpg\")
<\/a>Public Seminar\nInstitute for Critical Educational Studies<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n
THE REGIMES OF TRUTH OF (GLOBAL) CITIZENSHIP EDUCATION<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n Marta Estell\u00e9s, PhD Thursday, April 2, 2020 \u00a0<\/strong>Abstract <\/strong><\/p>\n The aim of this presentation is to briefly problematize current ways of thinking and talking about (global) citizenship education. Citizenship is a process more than it is an attribute, since the concept has incorporated the main characteristics both of the political transformations experienced by the State and of the State\u2019s relations with society. The successive battles for the definition of citizenship have an impact on that institution of socialization that is school. Examining the evolution of curricular prescriptions and orientations is enough to glimpse changes in the languages and frames through which certain relations between the individual, the community, and the State are naturalized.<\/p>\n The results of our research show that the two major cycles of socio-institutional restructuring in Western countries \u2013 from the crisis of the nineteenth-century liberal regimes to the present \u2013 have imposed different trends in relation to citizenship education in schools. The first cycle reached its culmination with the implementation of Welfare States after the Second World War. It was not a coincidence that the first major defense for democratic citizenship education appeared in this moment, with the reformist impulse that gave rise in 1916 to Social Studies in the US. The recognition of socio-economic rights and the formation of citizenship appeared inextricably linked in the texts of the reform, in an attempt to establish a new \u201cregime of truth\u201d that radically redefined the meaning of education for all, and not only for a privileged minority. This redefinition also implied a criticism of the patriotic and nationalistic purposes of education. This language, however, started to become blurred as neoliberal policies instituted their own frames in the 1980s with Reagan in the US and Thatcher in the UK. Citizenship education began to adopt the rhetoric of accountability with its emphasis on testing, performance levels, skills, etc. and the focus was on promoting responsible<\/em> and active<\/em> citizenship that clearly emphasized duties over rights. Thus, it began to be assumed that citizens should be responsible for their own well-being and not the State. Recent discourses on global citizenship education should be seen as heirs of this last redefinition. After all, global citizenship education \u201caims to empower learners to engage and assume active roles, both locally and globally, to face and resolve global challenges\u201d (UNESCO, 2014, p. 15), assuming that the responsibility of solving those challenges lies with the individuals, not on governments or international organizations.<\/p>\n Marta Estell\u00e9s, PhD, is Assistant Professor of the Department of Education at the University of Cantabria (Spain). Her research <\/em>interests include<\/em> citizenship education, social studies education, curriculum policies and teacher education. She has published several works on the intersectional field of democratic citizenship education and initial teacher education. She is currently working on a research project related to teachers\u2019 political views and behaviors and their attitudes towards including controversial issues in the classroom. She is also part of the Fedicaria collective (<\/em>http:\/\/www.fedicaria.org<\/a><\/em>), which advocates for critical social studies education.<\/em><\/p>\n Download flyer<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Event cancelled based on UBC recommendations regarding COVID-19. Public Seminar Institute for Critical Educational Studies THE REGIMES OF TRUTH OF (GLOBAL) CITIZENSHIP EDUCATION Marta Estell\u00e9s, PhD University of Cantabria (Spain) Thursday, April 2, 2020 12:30 \u2013 1:30 pm University of … Continue reading
\nUniversity of Cantabria (Spain)<\/span><\/p>\n
\n<\/strong>12:30 \u2013 1:30 pm
\n<\/strong>University of British Columbia, Vancouver \u2014 Scarfe 1209<\/strong><\/p>\n