India’s Developmental Concerns

As indicated in the economics section of this blog, India has sustained economic growth upon liberalization of the country, but at a cost of uneven development between states. Even with my own experience in India, I learned that within-state development can be uneven as well (e.g. a thriving metropolis versus an underdeveloped hinterland). Thus, my development concerns for India will focus primarily on ensuring that both slower states and less-developed parts of high-performing states catch up for everyone’s benefit.

To start with, providing relevant education and skills to Indians will be imperative. India is in the midst of transitioning to a knowledge-based economy, with skilled workers who can drive growth and innovation. Some challenges include coordinating skill development within the government, prioritizing skill formation in both formal and informal education institutes, acknowledging the informal sector, and standardizing required skills by industry. The cost for education infrastructure is also enormous. However, the government is not alone, as both NGOs and private companies are doing their part to achieve these skill development needs.1

Furthermore, fostering more business and entrepreneurship will be important for Indian development. One key component is financing MSMEs (Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises), a significant component of economic growth and poverty reduction. An ongoing World Bank project is focusing on increasing financial access for MSMEs, particularly in services and manufacturing. Notably, these businesses also matter to slower states as a good proportion of rural MSMEs are found there.2

Although both initiatives are crucial to India’s success, my concerns will still focus on ensuring that slower states and areas catch up to balance development across the country. Greater focus should be placed on developing skills and fostering entrepreneurship in the more underdeveloped parts of India while halting brain drain.

Footnotes

1. Tara, S. N., & Kumar, N. S. (2016). Skill development in India:: In conversation with S. Ramadorai, Chairman, National Skill Development Agency & National Skill Development Corporation; former CEO, MD and Vice Chairman, Tata Consultancy Services. IIMB Management Review28(4), 235-243.

2.  Government of India and World Bank Sign $500 Million Agreement to Improve Access to Finance for Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises. (2015). Retrieved February 16, 2018, from http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2015/03/31/india-sme-project-signing

India’s Civil Society

It is worth mentioning the role that civil society plays in India’s development, despite conversations about its national strategy. India maintains a vibrant civil society with around 1.5 million NGOs. From religious activity to community service, there is a variation in the kinds of initiatives that these NGOs focus on.1

Historically, civil society was observed as a complement to the government’s development needs. In the latter half of the 20th century, India’s NGO sector grew and received formal recognition by the government as state development partners. Although grassroots organizations were growing in this sector, the 1990s structural adjustment period lead to the rise of larger agents of aid, which pushed these smaller organizations from the limelight.1

Notably, over the years, NGOs have been influenced by the government’s development agenda. Whether it was capital-oriented priorities or anti-poverty programs, the NGO sector has shifted its focus accordingly in line with the government. Even during the structural reform period of the 90s, NGOs began to prioritize scaling up and working with the state to become a legitimate force.1

Indeed, there is a diversity of ways that NGOs are approaching the government (whether as partners or as opposing agents), but the general feeling is reluctant, yet pragmatic towards state cooperation. Nonetheless, the government has created bodies to encourage funding of NGOs (which potentially runs into problems of autonomy). As for general goals, aspects such as improving some socioeconomic services or increasing participation have converged. Differences are found in their approaches between a bureaucratic government and a more flexible NGO sector.1

Footnotes

1. Samaj, P. (2009). Overview of civil society organizations: India (Civil society brief). Retrieved from http://ris.org.in/pdf/fidc_policybrief7.pdf