A Space for Citizenship Education

Over the past five weeks, my placement at Kitsilano Neighbourhood House has primarily focused on assisting staff in organizing and facilitating the citizenU program. This program is an Action Research Initiative supported by the City of Vancouver that aims to educate youth between the ages of fifteen and twenty on discrimination, racism and bullying in their schools and neighbourhoods. In essence, it endeavours to raise awareness about inclusivity among young residents and citizens, and intends to debunk undesirable stereotypes.

citizenU, is a form of citizenship education that promotes knowledge and awareness of multiculturalism and inclusivity. Katharyne Mitchell, in her essay, entitled, “Education for Democratic Citizenship: Transnationalism, Multiculturalism, and the Limits of Liberalism”, explains that much modern democratic thought behind educational theory in Canada encompasses the idea that education must be culturally pluralistic and collective in nature. Education must therefore incorporate multiculturalism as a national narrative in order to promote a democratic public sphere. citizenU, in its content and structure, can be said to represent this type of education as it provides a platform for youth of all backgrounds to explore themes of diversity, equality and inclusivity within a public arena.

The basis of my final project stems specifically from my observations of participant interactions during citizenU training sessions at Kits House. In an increasingly multicultural city, it seems that citizenship education is a necessity among resident and citizen youth. The neighbourhood house setting is an ideal environment for promoting this type of education among the youth that access its services. I view the neighbourhood house as a space where youth from diverse backgrounds and belief systems can join together to discuss concepts and realities that they might otherwise not approach on their own.

Although merely an office area (given the organization’s recent temporary relocation), Kits House seems to provide a space for fostering awareness and encouraging solidarity among its diverse participant base. I have only been able to observe participants interact and engage in citizenU activities on a few occasions, however these observations have allowed me to make connections with themes from Sean Lauer and Miu Chung Yan‘s paper, Neighbourhood Houses and Bridging Social Ties. The authors explain that neighbourhood houses, or “voluntary associations”, as they are referred to, play a role in drawing people (both local and immigrant) together to form strong social ties as well as diverse peer networks. They also mention that such organizations allow for involvement throughout “the lifecourse” that other institutions or facilities, such as schools, may not be able to offer. This certainly is true of the citizenU program at Kits House. By providing a common space for learning about discrimination, diversity and inclusivity, through creative games and activities, Kits House offers a form of citizenship education that many schools do not or cannot. This neighbourhood house strives to meet the “instrumental and expressive needs” (as articulated by Lauer and Yan) of its youth participants. In essence, by teaching and promoting citizenship education, Kits House has given youth across ages (that is, between 13 and 19 years of age) the opportunity to collaborate intellectually, cultivate friendships and communicate ideas that they might not otherwise have found the space in which to do so.

Works Cited:

Lauer. S.R. & Yan, M.C.

2007.             Neighbourhood Houses and Social Ties.  Centre of Excellence for Research on Immigration and Diversity: Working Paper Series.  5-34.

Mitchell, K.

2001.           Education for Democratic Citizenship: Transnationalism, Multiculturalism, and the Limits of Liberalism. Harvard Educational Review 71(1): 51-78

 

An Insider-Outsider Balance

Having identified the “everyday world as our problematic”, Dorothy Smith, in her book, provides a solid basis for understanding how sociological explorers must learn to scrutinize all social events as a result of their position inside and outside the situation. Central to Smith’s argument is the notion that these positionalities must create a balance between making objective observation and engaging in inquiry. I have realized, over the course of my fieldwork at the Kitsilano Neighbourhood House office, that it is extremely important to maintain my role as an external observer and an internal discerner of culture.

Firstly, as an observer and outsider, I have tried to survey the dynamics of the space with intention and purpose. In order to do this, I have had to reconfigure my mind to constantly remain alert to the new environment I’m in. This has involved developing a sensory consciousness of the space around me: what new images am I seeing; what new sounds am I perceiving; what new smells am I detecting; and most importantly, what new emotions am I feeling? Remaining sensitive to each unfamiliar detail has therefore been an effective way of making and maintaining useful observations of my surroundings.

Secondly, as an inquirer and insider, I have found it necessary to engage myself with the “daily practices of (the) actual individuals” that I am working with (as Smith describes).  So far, I have been able to carry this out by taking the time to converse with my supervisors and other staff members, asking them informally about their backgrounds as well as their roles in Kits House activities. I have also participated in several meetings and events to understand the dynamics of my work environment and the relationship between Kits House and other community partners. My engagement with youth in the Citizen U program that I am involved in has given me a chance to learn about their perspectives on discrimination and racism in a high school environment. Thus, I have used my opportunities within the Kits office to develop rapport with the staff and program participants.

While I have easily been able to identify this insider-outsider dualism, I have not found it an easy task to actually separate the two perspectives while at work. The staff at the Kits House office have been extremely friendly and inclusive – in fact, I feel like I’ve worked with them for a longer period than just three weeks! This has made it easier for me to position myself as an insider and to genuinely enjoy making connections with those around me, while learning about their work ethic. Taking the role of an outsider has been more challenging as it has involved me constantly reminding myself about being sensitive to small details that I otherwise would not pay much attention to.

The staff of Kitsilano Neighbourhood House, having recently encountered a transition in terms of the physical relocation of their work, has had to adjust and re- adapt to their new environment. This change has, to some degree, impacted the means by which programs are organized and community members participate. I have found myself, time and time again, viewing the whole process of relocation as a metaphor for migration, whereby newcomers and immigrants move to a foreign environment and must make use of the resources around them, however limited, to remain productive and successful in society. I have found this metaphor of movement and change a useful and appealing lens through which to examine the internal-external dynamic of positionality in my work place.

Smith, Dorothy E. 1988 The Everyday World as Problematic: A Feminist Sociology. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.