Un-marketing Rhino Horns

As opposed to thinking of strategic ways to sell a product, governments must put their heads together to come up with a way to “un-market” rhino horns before the precious animals become extinct.

Rhino horns are a popular commodity in Asia used as a symbol of rank and for “supposed” medicinal purposes, but the latter has never been proven. The market has grown in South Africa due to an influx of Chinese immigrants, creating new records for the number of rhinoceroses killed per year.

In an effort to obliterate the market for rhinos, Tanzania has proposed a tactic in which horns will be injected with poison to discourage purchases. After all, why would anyone pay a high price for a potentially toxic product? The only concern is for the long-term health of the rhinos, possible complications with the injection, and if people will still risk buying a horn despite the dangers.

Other suggestions include educating people about rhino horns, legalizing the sale of rhino horns so as to prevent black markets while decreasing the incentive for poachers, and ―if the former suggestion goes through― increasing supply to drive down prices. Problems with these recommendations include government indecision/lack of action, possibility of more demand than supply, and the inelastic nature of the supply of rhinoceroses due to their breeding patterns.

So what else can we, as human beings, do? What are other ways to un-market rhino horns?

A de-horned rhino, a sight that no one wants to see.

Edgy Advertisement

Trying to Be Hip and Edgy, Ads Become Offensive

Controversial ad by Mountain Dew, whose parent company, PepsiCo, had to apologize on behalf of later on.

In an effort to breakthrough to the millennial market, many major companies have fallen victim to ad controversies, where the viral commercial they wanted to create comes out offensive and degrading, causing public outcry. The market has become an increasingly competitive place, and companies now view the production of ads as a “race to retweet and to click ‘thumbs up’, ” (Nancy Hill, president and chief executive of the American Association of Advertising Agencies) causing the inevitable cycle of contentious ads being released, public outrage, and apologies from firms with promises to never do it again. But does it stop at that? Take PepsiCo for example, a big name corporation facing several controversies regarding its Mountain Dew brand due to vulgar lyrics in an ad sung by Lil Wayne, and another discriminatory ad created by hip-hop producer and rap artist Tyler, the Creator.

Personally, I do not think it will stop. Although I understand the intention of advertising agencies, who desire to create ads that do not get tossed away and forgotten within months of airing, the tactics used are unacceptable. An ad does not have to be sexual or violent in order to attract attention; creativity and humour are alternatives to producing pleasant and popular ads.

Bottom line: edgy advertisement can quickly draw public attention; however, is it ethical to exploit sensitive subjects for the mere publicity?

More information can be found below:

Link to original article: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/11/business/media/trying-to-be-hip-and-edgy-ads-become-offensive.html?pagewanted=all

Further reading: http://business-ethics.com/2013/05/17/1631-when-edgy-advertising-sends-the-wrong-message/