Categories
Uncategorized

Interactive Marketing

After reading an article on Mashable about the new Esquire Magazine application for Ipad, I simply had to share it.

Essentially, Esquire Magazine has developed an application for the Ipad where users can not only read editions of the magazine, but they can interact with the magazine itself. You can swipe and scroll through articles easily, tap for thumbnails, highlight points, rotate photos to see it from different angles, and (probably my favourite feature) photos come to life and can turn into videos (this reminds me very much of the idea of moving photographs in Harry Potter).

It’s not like your conventional digital magazine that you get on a Kindle where you scroll through page by page. This actually fully integrates its magazine in such a way that users can interact and read it the way that they want to.

Think this new innovation is important to look out for for a few reasons. First, it shows that magazines/print newspapers are adapting to the current trends of the digital/electronic way. Secondly, it opens up a whole new way of marketing print ads to people. In the video demo, you see what would be a normal photo advertisement for an Audi car suddenly come to life and you can hear its engines roar as a video commercial of it plays.

Clearly, electronics/gadgets aren’t making people dumber. Rather, its giving us even more avenues for which to read and explore topics in a way that print ads just don’t offer. Also, its changing the way in which companies can market and reach audiences. Rather than having a static, photo ad. They can allow audiences to tap, enlarge, shrink, move, rotate, change colour of, move, and engage with their advertisements.

Check out a video demo of the new Esquire App being demoed:

(Video is kind of dry, I know. Make sure to check out the article in Mashable though!)

Categories
Uncategorized

A Different Spin with Mark Hoppus


For anyone else who grew up listening to the angst, at times immature, punk/pop/rock of Blink-182, you’ll recognize the name Mark Hoppus (aka the bass player).
Ever since Blink-182 took a hiatus in 2002, Mark embarked on a few side projects that have since then become big hits in the music market (well, the indie/punk scene in any case). He started his own blog wittily entitled “Hi my name is Mark” that was accompanied with a weekly podcast where he interviewed new artists/bands and generally talked about music/posted new music for the world to share. Since its inception, the Hi my name is Mark blog/podcast has grown with Hoppus becoming a bigger name and trendsetter in the music industry; doing more and more interviews and effectively using his blog as a way to promote his personal music endeavours (his bands +44 and Blink-182). When Blink-182 came off a hiatus and rumours began circling of a possible reunion tour, sneak-peak snapshots of the trio were put up on his blog, generating a great deal of buzz amongst Blink fans.

Recently, Hoppus’ hobby of interviewing musicians has been taken to the next level as he has partnered up with Fuse to start his own talk show entitled “a Different Spin”. Using his blog as a key marketing tool, he’s posted up teaser photos , blog posts and multiple Youtube videos; all with the same tongue-in-cheek, sarcastic and witty humour that Hi My Name is Mark followers are used to. These promotional videos have definitely set the online community a buzzing and Spin has been able to continue this buzz through their effective integration of social media within their marketing campaign. On the A Different Spin website, fans can have their tweets shown on a live feed and can play interactive games/quizzes that can be linked to their Facebook.

So far all of his promotional spots have revolved around Mark’s personality and I think this will be the key to his success with the show. It’s his humour, personality and general attitude towards life, exemplified in the show’s tagline “Trust me, I’m in a band”, that really reaches out to his target audience.

Overall, with its integration of social media tools, the personality of Mark Hoppus and Spin’s ability to really stay on-top of current social and music trends, as its been proven on their website, this show definitely has promise. I’m sure other Hi my Name is Mark followers and blink fans will be eagerly tuned and waiting to see the direction a Different Spin will take us in.

Categories
Uncategorized

Scott Pilgrim: Post Mortem

YouTube Preview Image

Scott Pilgrim Versus the World , For any of you fellow comic book geeks out there, you’d have gone out and seen this by now and have enjoyed  its 2 hours of epicness. For the rest of you though, which evidently is a lot of you as you’ll soon see, something deterred you from forking over $12 and a Friday night. Lets look at the reasons why. . .

First off, I’d like to say that Scott Pilgrim was an absolutely well-done movie; the editing was great, it was new and is the first movie to bring a comic book to life into through the medium of film (aka its legit a comic book made into a movie, not a movie based on a comic book). Critics absolutely raved about Scott Pilgrim, giving it glowing reviews; some of which were even on par with Inception. Point being, this movie has value.

So, if not the quality of the movie itself, why did Scott Pilgrim yield such an unsatisfactory $10.5 million in its first weekend (a mere dent in the movies $90 million budget). This answer, I do believe, lies primarily in the marketing strategy Universal embarked on.

After the excitement the film’s Comic-Con panel set flame to, Universal threw down over $60 million into a marketing campaign for the movie. The problem it seems though, in the aftermath of the film’s box office run of less than $30 million, was that they were trying to sell something to those were already sold on the product.

That is to say, they were promoting Scott Pilgrim like mad among the comic book community (which makes up a very, very small portion of the movie-goer community), most of whom were already set to watch the movie anyways. Universal failed to reach a wider audience (i.e. people who aren’t in tune to who Bryan Lee O’Malley is). By spending, or rather wasting, their money on marketing solely to a very small, focused group, they missed out on sales from the greater, more general population.

Secondly, it seems Universal didn’t quite have a firm grasp on what it was they were marketing. Granted, trying to explain to someone the essence of Scott Pilgrim is remarkably difficult (its about this unemployed guy who’s dating a high schooler whose also in a band but then falls in love with this girl but has to defeat her 7 evil-ex boyfriends and while he’s not a superhero, he like has these powers when he fights…). Scott Pilgrim is hard to sell. In the trailers, they tried selling it as a part rom-com part action flick. . .  which only led purveyors of both genres to be turned off it. (Even Michael Cera was quoted as saying that Pilgrim is “a tricky one to sell. I don’t know how you convey that movie in a marketing campaign. I can see it being something that people are slow to discover”.

Action star-stacked, The Expendables came out the same weekend and it was easy to see why action lovers went straight to the former for their fix of mindless explosions and straight-up action. With its stacked cast, the Schwarzenegger’s cameo for all its worth and promise of no-plot line to get in the way of the action, The Expendables did a good job of pinpointing exactly what their ‘product’ and subsequently had no troubles marketing it successfully. In short, audiences knew what to expect. And when it came to make a decision between throwing down $12 for the Expendables or Scott Pilgrim, the $64.9 M raked in by the Expendables gives us a pretty good idea who won that battle.

(I would also like to note that the casting of Michael Cera as Scott Pilgrim likely did nothing to help boost movie sales. Not when a) Michael Cera has done enough films now to solidify the notion that he only plays 1 character and b) he’s a whiny bitch kid who is anything but Scott Pilgrim).

To be honest, maybe what some bloggers have been saying about Scott Pilgrim is true, that the movie was just too smart for audiences. The world just wasn’t ready for it. But then again, Inception seemed like it found a niche in today’s social trends. I will continue being a fan of Scott Pilgrim (both the novels and the movie) and hope that its DVD release will have a longer shelf life than its theatre counterpart. In any case, it appears that some good did come out of the movie, for the last month, Scott Pilgrim comics have been in the Top 10 highest selling comics with Vol. 1 holding the number one spot. Indicating that a lot of new readers have been turned on to the series.

Note: many, many, many articles have been written about the Scott Pilgrim movie trying to piece together the puzzle as to why this movie fizzled at the box office. Worth checking out:

http://www.cracked.com/funny-4739-scott-pilgrim/

The Star.com


Spam prevention powered by Akismet