Personal Blog #5: Aboriginal Title Rights VS. Gold-Copper Project

Standard

Aboriginal Title Rights VS. Gold-Copper Project

Fishlake

Protesting of the Tsilhqot’in people

New Prosperity is an undeveloped project of Taseko Mines Ltd, which will provide a massive production of copper and gold. However, it has been continuously challenged by the Tsilhqot’in people, claiming “hunting, fishing, and trapping rights in the area” and now “folded the mine site into the tribal park boundary.”¹ In my perspective, this opposition affected Taseko negatively not only by political factors, but also by social factors regarding to PEST analysis.

Due to the first nation’s consistent appeals, the government paid much attention on this long-running battle. Since 2010, the project had already been “rejected twice by the federal government” concerning of damage to “fish and fish habitat.”² This regulation caused the company could not put its plans into effect and start the operation of the project. If the project is still prohibited in the future, Taseko will probably consider abandoning this project no matter how much effort it had put in before.

The social influence from Tsilhqot’in community members and supporters cannot be neglected as well. On December 13, 2014, a gathering protested “New Prosperity Mine outside of Taseko Mines Ltd.’s Vancouver office.”³ The crowd included not only the aboriginal people, but also their supporters who were persuaded by the Tsilhqot’in. With the number of opponents increases, the project will less likely be approved by the federal government and the company will have a notorious reputation. As a consequence, I would suggest that the business environment of Taseko Mines Ltd will be worse in its future development.

 

Endnotes: 

1. Larry, Pynn. “Tsilhqot’in Set to Declare Site of New Prosperity Mine a Tribal Park.”www.vancouversun.com. Larry Pynn, 11 Sept. 2014. Web. 7 Oct. 2014. <http://www.vancouversun.com/news/metro/Unilateral park declared Tsilhqot includes Prosperity mine/10192766/story.html>.

2. Refer to endnote 1.

3. Monica, Lamb. “Tsilhqot’in and Supporters Protest New Prosperity Mine – Williams Lake Tribune.” Williams Lake Tribune. Monica Lamb, 18 Dec. 2013. Web. 7 Oct. 2014. <http://www.wltribune.com/news/236412091.html>.

Picture reference:  

Retrieved from <http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=3258>.

Article Reference:

Larry, Pynn. “Tsilhqot’in Set to Declare Site of New Prosperity Mine a Tribal Park.”www.vancouversun.com. Larry Pynn, 11 Sept. 2014. Web. 7 Oct. 2014. <http://www.vancouversun.com/news/metro/Unilateral park declared Tsilhqot includes Prosperity mine/10192766/story.html>.

Monica, Lamb. “Tsilhqot’in and Supporters Protest New Prosperity Mine – Williams Lake Tribune.” Williams Lake Tribune. Monica Lamb, 18 Dec. 2013. Web. 7 Oct. 2014. <http://www.wltribune.com/news/236412091.html>.

“Understanding Pest Analysis with Definitions and Examples.” PESTLE Analysis. 31 Dec. 2013. Web. 7 Oct. 2014. <http://pestleanalysis.com/pest-analysis/>.

Continue reading

Personal Blog #4: A Battle between Netflix and Verizon

Standard

A Battle between Netflix and Verizon

by Daniel Kirschenbaum

Netflix and Verizon

Since early this year, Netflix have started a war of words with its Internet service providers (ISPs)- Verizon. Due to poor video streaming speeds, Netflix blamed Verizon for its “congested network and failing to provide the consistent bandwidth for Netflix customers.”¹ As a response, Verizon claimed there was “no congestion on its own network”, but blamed Netflix that it had “limited choice of transit providers.”²

As a layman of digital technology, I was unable to judge which one of them should be responsible for the stuttering streaming speed. However, from the perspective of mutual benefit and sustainable development, it was apparent to say neither of them was acting as a friendly partner. Although both Netflix and Verizon agreed that there occurred an Internet traffic problem, they disagreed on who is to blame and therefore induced a public controversy. This lasting word war not only affected their partnerships negatively, but also could not solve the problem efficiently. A good partnership should based on harmonious communication and genuine reliance.

To optimize their business relationship, I tend to recommend that Netflix and Verizon should figure out the solution for the problem together, rather than pushing responsibility back and forth towards each other. Therefore, there will be a “win-win-win situation for content providers, telcos and end users” at the same time.³

 

Endnotes:

1. Dror, Gill. “Netflix Vs. Verizon Vs. Consumer: Who Wins? | TechCrunch.” TechCrunch. Gill Dror, 6 Sept. 2014. Web. 1 Oct. 2014. <http://techcrunch.com/2014/09/06/netflix-vs-verizon-vs-consumer-can-everyone-win/>.

2. Refer to endnote 1.

3. Lan, Paul. “Verizon and Netflix Continue Battle over Slow, Stuttering Streaming Speeds.”TechHive. Lan Paul, 11 July 2014. Web. 1 Oct. 2014. <http://www.techhive.com/article/2452751/verizon-and-netflix-continue-battle-over-slow-stuttering-streaming-speeds.html>.

Picture reference:  

Retrieved from <http://www.flashrouters.com/blog/?attachment_id=8511>.

Article Reference:

Dror, Gill. “Netflix Vs. Verizon Vs. Consumer: Who Wins? | TechCrunch.” TechCrunch. Gill Dror, 6 Sept. 2014. Web. 1 Oct. 2014. <http://techcrunch.com/2014/09/06/netflix-vs-verizon-vs-consumer-can-everyone-win/>.

Lan, Paul. “Verizon and Netflix Continue Battle over Slow, Stuttering Streaming Speeds.”TechHive. Lan Paul, 11 July 2014. Web. 1 Oct. 2014. <http://www.techhive.com/article/2452751/verizon-and-netflix-continue-battle-over-slow-stuttering-streaming-speeds.html>.

Osterwalder, Alexander, and Yves Pigneur. “The Business Model Canvas.” Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2010. Print.

Continue reading