Opportunity Cost

Is going to University worth the cost?

Let us examine the numbers:

123 Universities in America charge over $50,000 per year.

American national average income: $42,000 per year.

Harvard

Room and board: $12,801

School costs: $41,760

Total costs: $54,561

 

Total costs of attending Harvard over 4 years (including room and board): (54,561 x 4) = $218,244

Best forgone alternative over 4 years (job earnings – room and board):[(42,000 x 4) – (12,801 x 4)] = $116,796

(Total costs of attending Harvard) + (Best forgone alternative) = Opportunity Cost

(54,561 x 4) + [(42,000 x 4) + (12,801 x 4)] = $335,040

Theoretically, it costs $335,040 to attend Harvard over 4 years.

 

Assume a Harvard graduate makes $33,504 more than the National average:

Yearly income of Harvard graduate: 42,000 + 33,504 = $75,504

Total earnings over 10 years of Harvard graduate: 75,504 x 10 = $755,040

Yearly income of average worker: $42,000

Total earnings over 10 years of average worker: 42,000 x 10 = $420,000

(Total earnings of Harvard graduate over 10 years) – (Total earnings of average worker over 10 years) = 755,040 – 420,000 = $335,040 

Break-even point following graduation: 10 years

 

So much stock is put into “higher education”, but simple analysis of numbers says post-secondary education is absurdly overpriced and overvalued. The fact that the average American earns less than the cost of attending University is astounding. Knowledge is power, but the costs are overwhelming. Today, students and their families must be careful when investing in the greatest stock of all: education.

BOOMTOWN

Living in B.C., we are familiar with oil and mineral boomtowns. Most of us have heard stories or even know individuals sacrifising comfortable lives near Vancouver to battle the elements of Northern B.C..

Question: Are generous salaries worth the isolation and hardship of boomtown life?

North Dakota has become the hotspot for those willing to suffer for cash. Oil companies are paying workers an average salary of $100,000, many of whom have no experience or college degree.

Halliburton (Fortune 500), Continental Resources, Hess (Fortune 500), and Whiting Petroleum are the driving forces behind the incredible boom of North Dakota oil companies. Different jobs include haulling crude and equipment in trucks, maintenance, administrative work, and working on a rig. This boom has resonated around the area, with 2,500 job openings at any given moment.

 

The trade-off for fat paychecks is steep. Workers are sleeping 3/4 hours a day, working overtime at every opportunity (100 hours a week is not uncommon). In addition to lack of sleep, workers are faced with the challenge of simply FINDING A PLACE TO SLEEP. The boom has tripled housing prices, forcing many workers to sleep in their cars. Couple in the fact that North Dakota winters reach -40 easily and workers may re-evaluate leaving home.

 

 

Response to Nathan Ma’s Blog Post #2: Concert Tickets

Price Floor

Price Floor

All sports fans are exposed to the power of microeconomics: the black market. We are familiar with scalpers outside stadiums and also distributors on the Internet. Classmate Nathan Yu explains fans of bands or sports teams are willing to pay fortunes for live tickets. This incredible demand coupled with limited supply creates a massive shortage. Suppliers are unable to satisfy the desires of consumers, either due to government intervention (binding price ceiling) or limited supply. “Entrepreneurs” capitalize on this opportunity to monopolize the market, reaping enormous illegal profits (black market). At Qs, sellers realize consumer’s willingness to pay much more, thus selling at a price satisfying demand. The inability of supply and demand forces to reach free market levels is an issue, causing black markets, rationing, seller’s preferences, and first come first served policies.

 

Scalping

Scalping

I have voluntarily been victimized by multiple black market operations. Paying free market prices for sporting event tickets is merely a fantasy. Five times the face-value of a Canucks or Olympics ticket is reasonable. The free, competitive market cannot be stopped, only disrupted. The market is a self-serving, self-sufficient machine that runs smoothly by itself, thus, I must accept the black market as a naturally occuring phenomenon.

Grey Market

Grey Market

Response to Stephen Ilagan’s Blog Post #2: Google

Classmate Stephen Illagan raises a valid point that never previously concerned me. Google essentially has a monopoly over the entire cyber world.

Googolopoly

Googolopoly

Google owns the real-estate of the entire Internet, with all sources “renting” space on Google’s empire. Google’s search engine has become God over all things cyber-space, a dictatorship with absolute power (afterall, it does have satellite images of every inch on Earth – Google Maps). What we see is what Google wants us to see! Enormous acquisitions have Google directing traffic back to its own products! Imagine: Google has the power to bury ANY SITE deep in its search results. With this God-like status, any competitor it has is virtually worthless. The money made from advertising and Internet search is used to expand its empire even further (eg. Youtube, Motorola, DoubleClick, etc…). Google has created an alternative to every leader in the technological world: Facebook vs. Google+, Internet explorer vs Google Chrome, Hotmail vs. Gmail, Microsoft Word vs. Google Docs, Android vs iPhone, Library Databases vs. Google Scholar, the list goes on.

Google’s expansion is literally otherworldy. The Internet belongs to Google.

Google 2084

Google 2084

 

(I wish I had seen this before I finished writing)

Google\’s Masterplan for Domination & Power

An Age-Old Issue

 

Standard Minimum Wage Graph
Standard Minimum Wage Graph

The article I stumbled upon while browsing CNN perfectly coincided with our current studies in microeconomics. A binding price floor (price set above market equilibrium) causes an excess of labour (unemployment). Cost of labour to firms rise, who have no choice but to eliminate workers and increase the workload of existing workers to match previous levels of production. Workers fortunate enough to keep their jobs are beneficiaries. Firms, workers laid off, and those unable to find jobs in this new market, are the losers. The government has caused a disequilibrium (demand of labour exceeds supply of labour).

Eight states in the U.S. have announced minimum wage increases. The U.S.A. is in a sticky situation at the moment. On one hand, the federal minimum wage ($7.25/hr) amounts to $15,000/yr for a full-time worker, below the poverty rate for a family of four. These struggling families would be winners. On the flip side, 6.9 million jobs were lost during the recession, with minimum wages driving this number up. Spending will get the economy going, but increasing the minimum wage creates joblessness, further compounding the problem. The American government must collaborate with economists to develop both short-term and long-term solutions, avoiding social unrest.