Corrections from TA:
Q1: does not have consistent resolution and therefore density of available data. would miss minor peaks or holes due to large contour intervals. -.25
Q2: definite and intermittent
Q4: 1.5/2; can also add unit of elevation, GCS info
Q5: planar does not take acount of earth curvature. when the study site is small (such as current) planar is good enough. if the study site is large, like North America, then the curvature must be taken care of. -.5
Q7: 4.75/6; things to improve: you can add GCS info; river is a bit hard to see; add some guidance text on which habitats do you recommend the botanist to start with
Q8: 4.5/6; area of each cell times the cell count, and do unit conversion from m2 to ha. when suggesting habitat to be surveyed, you can also consider the road accessibility. is this habitat easily accessible by car?
need to calculate the ha
8/10
