Categories
Uncategorized

Windows is saving us from Windows? Really?

I was reading Gavin Li’s post about Microsoft’s “a phone to save ourselves from our phone”, and it caught my interest because I also have a smart phone with the Windows OS on it. I have an LG IQ, and I think I’m the only one on the face of the planet to have this phone. For about a week, it was the top of the line, the crème de la crème, the cat’s pajamas for new Telus smart phones. I think the phone’s only saving grace is its lengthwise slide out keyboard that is extremely useful for texting and emailing.  I hate the phone though, and I started to realize that it’s not the phone I hate, but the Windows Mobile operating system. It is too much like a computer. I don’t have any “fun” apps on my phone. I can’t pretend I’m drinking a beer or use it as a level when hanging a picture. Noooo, my phone comes installed with a mobile version of Excel, Word, and Powerpoint. Sooooo much fun!!! *Sarcasm. When was the last time you wanted to make a Powerpoint presentation on your phone? “Check it guys, I got Apple’s third quarter results, and they are kicking Microsoft’s butt! And then I made a Powerpoint presentation to show you, ALL ON MY PHONE!” And maybe it’s not entirely the components of a Windows Mobile smart phone, but its utter lack of user-friendliness. Microsoft’s claim to fame way-back-when was its Windows OS system for PCs that made it super easy, even for grandmothers, to use a computer. They continued this format with the phone, which also has a “Start” button on the top left corner of my touch screen. The problem is, it’s TINY! As I don’t use that stupid little stylus that came with the phone, and use only my fingers, I find it extremely difficult to hit the start button without hitting the area directly below, that displays the date and time. The battery power button is right next to phone volume, which is right next to the “Ok” button to close the screen. These “buttons” are about 1/8th of an inch. Pretty hard to accurately hit the right buttons when the surface area of your index finger is about half an inch squared. At this point, I’m at a rant, but I’m just going to go with it at this point. The final thing I HATE about my phone is that I apparently have “worn out” the “ok” button area on my touch screen. Doesn’t work anymore. At all. I now have to open the slider of my phone to rotate the screen horizontally so I can hit the Ok button that is now in the bottom right hand corner of the touch screen.

The second point I’m going to make, (to build up to the point about this blog) is that I have recently learned that Bill Gate’s stole the GUI idea from Steve Jobs. It was Steve Jobs that first designed a user-friendly way to operate a computer, but Bill Gates copied the idea to develop their Windows OS. In a court settlement over patent infringement, the courts ordered Microsoft to pay $400 million to Apple. That’s chump change when you think about how much the Windows concept has benefited Microsoft.

That brings me to the final point. If Windows is going to develop a better user-friendly OS for smart phones that will allow people to get in and out, they are definitely going to have to abandon their current format and once again, copy Apple. I don’t have an iPhone, but I have seen people use them, and those big buttons and how quickly people can use their phone makes me drool! The last point then is Microsoft’s advertising campaign must be extremely effective to convey their new OS format to be considered even remotely comparable to that of Apple’s. I find it funny to see how they portray people in their ad to be so “involved” in their phone, when they are portraying the CURRENT people that use phones with the Windows OS. The people who are glued to their cell screen are the people that are playing the games and watching movies and doing everything else that is so cool on the iPhone. I’m the person that is trying to use the very tip of my pinky finger to hit the “ok” button without hitting the battery button or the date and time button. And P.S. – I have walked into people before!

Categories
Uncategorized

Dynamic Online Marketing

I found this post by Lee Odden, 3 Thoughts on the Future of Online Marketing, on the Top Rank Online Marketing Blog quite relevant and relatable. The author stresses the importance of active online marketing that is dynamic and conveyable through the rapidly progressing interaction between social networking and search engine innovations. Within the past few weeks I have noticed that searching on Google has been modified so as to display and change the search hits as I type into the search bar, so that the hits continuously change as I modify the query, and this is a search engine innovation that Lee Odden was referring to. And many companies now are providing means for consumers to link their websites and their products through their Facebook accounts. Another important point that Odden makes is now the necessity to provide a means of consumer “interaction” with online marketing. For example, consumers now want to be able to post reviews of a product on the company webpage, and “Like” it with Facebook, and “Chirp(?)” it with Twitter, or post it on Google Buzz. When consumers find a product they like, they want everyone else on the web to know they like it too, which is extending the advertisement’s original scope. Consumers are now advertising company’s products for free by allowing their ads and websites to be linked to their social media sites.

I had to smile when I saw at the end of this post that there were links to “Like” on Facebook, “Tweet” on Twitter, post on Google Buzz, Access through a RSS Feed, Rate on a star system, Subscribe to, Comment on, and a list of other Related Posts that I may enjoy reading. This blog itself is implementing all of the new methods for active online marketing.

Categories
Uncategorized

Starbucks Ends Distribution Deal With Kraft

I read in an article from Brand Republic that Starbucks has recently ended a global distribution deal with Kraft that allowed Kraft to distribute Starbucks coffee through various supermarkets. Starbucks and Kraft held this arrangement for 12 years. It has raised speculation that Starbucks will handle all of its retail distribution within their own stores.

I find this very interesting because it seems like Starbucks is closing a distribution channel and making their product less available to consumers by dropping this arrangement. The consumers who chose to buy bags of Starbucks coffee in supermarkets are no longer able to procure their coffee in this way, and may possibly end up switching to a competitor brand.

Starbucks may feel that they could earn higher margins by selling their coffee only in their stores, but I think that by reducing its outside availability, they may lose sales. I honestly think that this is a step backwards in a growth strategy, and has undertones of greed. Starbucks opened 223 new locations within this year, and has strengthened its partnership with Yahoo!, which provides the free wi-fi. By terminating what seemed like a beneficial arrangement with Kraft, Starbucks may prevent establishing partnerships with other major companies.  Let’s just hope that by burning the Kraft bridge, their other partnership bridges don’t also ignite.

Spam prevention powered by Akismet