Lockout – NBA Style Pt.2

In response and to add on top of Adrian’s blog about NBA Lockout

The NBA 2011-2012 season was scheduled to begin on November 1st. However, due to the unsettled Collective Bargain Agreement, the future of the season remains unknown. As Adrian has pointed out in his post, the players union had rejected owner’s offer multiple times over the dispute of BRI, Basketball Related Income, share between owners and players. It is evident to see why the players would reject the proposal since the owners want to cut the share from 57% player to 47-50%. The players are taking a pay-cut of at least 7% since the owners claim to be losing money. The previous blog on NBA (Accountant’s Magic – NBA Style Pt.1) discussed the issue of teams claiming to be in deficit. One interesting thing to note is that, Michael Jordan, basketball legend, now the majority owner of Charlotte Bobcats, has been one of the hardline owners who want to cap the share at a dreadful 47% due to team loss. However, in 1998 under a similar dispute over labour agreement, Jordan, then a player, criticized the owners with the famous quote, “If you can’t make a profit, you should sell your team”. We can definitely see some hypocrisy from Jordan.

NBA Commissioner David Stern VS Head of Players Union Derek Fisher

From a marketing perspective, the lockout is not healthy at all for the basketball industry. The NBA has reached record viewership last season, having a lockout could cause a loss of fans, since in the US does not seem to lack choices of sport entertainment. If the NBA stays idle, it can be hurting not only the players and owners, but also many related businesses and workers.

Accountant’s Magic – NBA Style Pt. 1

Recently in class and in the tutorial section, we have talked about financial accounting and how a company’s financial report can be misleading. I immediately related the topic to my “beloved” NBA and the teams’ infamous profitability to avoid tax.

“Under generally accepted accounting principles, I can turn a $4 million profit into a $2 million loss and I could get every national accounting firm to agree with me.”    – former Blue Jays VP Paul Beeston

First trick is the RDA, Roster Depreciation Allowance(see article). Introduced in 1959, the allowance argues that players are a depreciable asset once they are paid. Indeed, a 35-year-old player’s value might be decreasing over time, but there are young players who might develop multi-million values in a short span of time. This is their own personal earning power change, not the teams’. The trick is to list both player salary and RDA (loss on players’ contracts) as operating expenses. Well, if the team spent 50-million on players, the maximum loss would be 50 million, which is the worst case scenario that all of them got permanently injured and cannot play. However, under the RDA, the team can post another 50-million-dollar loss in this case, and the total loss suddenly become 100 millions, and that is significant.

So , when you see a sports’ team losing millions of dollar for more than 5 years, you might have to wonder why they can keep operating normally. Of course, it’s the “love for basketball”, the owner might say.