SECTIONS

Posted by: | September 24, 2010 | 2 Comments

Since I am primarily an elementary school  teacher, Bates and Poole’s Sections Framework seemed to resonate a little more with me than Chickering and Gamson’s framework. I am all too familiar with the problems associated with the costs of technology. For example, it can be quite the problem if you are trying to implement a movie-making unit and there is a lack of equipment for the unit to run smoothly. In addition, the reliability and ease of using video equipment pose an equally sticky situation. Furthermore, I think where I have run into problems in the past is in regards to the appropriateness of technologies for a particular group of students. Sometimes I have become way too ambitious with projects and as a result they didn’t go exactly as planned and didn’t enhance students’ learning in a way that I thought the technology would.


Comments

2 Comments so far

  1. John Egan on September 24, 2010 8:40 pm

    I have too–but I don’t ever want to lose that enthusiasm for innovation. I am a bit more reflective before I dive in though.

    A bit. 🙂

  2. kduffy on September 25, 2010 8:15 am

    Such a good point, Joey. I have come up against the exact same issues. I think that not having the $ to spend on the technology I want is my biggest roadblock. Even using the ‘free’ software is difficult in my building, because our mobile mac lab is getting older and starting to fail. (Not to mention that the demand for it around the building has increased tenfold…)

Name (required)

Email (required)

Website

Speak your mind

Spam prevention powered by Akismet