This picture has both a tremendous, yet derogative narrative. Evidently shown in the picture, there is one man on the floor, and one man walking, leaving him behind. Nevertheless, the individual that is laying on the ground is wearing full black clothes, a hat and gloves; while the one that is leaving is dressed as a common civilian (wearing sandals).
Ambiguity rises by questioning what just happened. Did the all-ready, dressed up man just got beaten by a tranquil civilian? Why? Is he supposed to be a robber (given his clothes)?; or Is he hurt? and is the other guy going to call for help?
Once again, I was fascinated by how indecipherable the faces are to the camera when they are not looking at it.
Furthermore, What dooes the title have to do with the picture? Whos is Mr. K? Is his benefit to leave this man hurt, and on the ground? Or is the hurt man Mr. K, who will benefit from the call of help the civilian is going to make?
This picture has both a tremendous, yet derogative narrative. Evidently shown in the picture, there is one man on the floor, and one man walking, leaving him behind. Nevertheless, the individual that is laying on the ground is wearing full black clothes, a hat and gloves; while the one that is leaving is dressed as a common civilian (wearing sandals).
Ambiguity rises by questioning what just happened. Did the all-ready, dressed up man just got beaten by a tranquil civilian? Why? Is he supposed to be a robber (given his clothes)?; or Is he hurt? and is the other guy going to call for help?
Once again, I was fascinated by how indecipherable the faces are to the camera when they are not looking at it.
Furthermore, What dooes the title have to do with the picture? Whos is Mr. K? Is his benefit to leave this man hurt, and on the ground? Or is the hurt man Mr. K, who will benefit from the call of help the civilian is going to make?