Monthly Archives: January 2017

Response to the LAST 201 Folk Stories

Before even reading these short stories, I assumed that they were going to be exotic and weird. I’m not sure why but every time I think about Latin culture, I think of a culture that is wild and fun. So, I naturally assumed that this wildness would be demonstrated in their works of writing. Furthermore, “Don Quixote” was the only novel I read that was somewhat “Latin” and Don Quixote was a weird and crazy book. That’s not to say that I didn’t enjoy it though.

So, when I began to read the two stories, it really struck out to me how normal they seemed. I would have thought that it was an English writer who wrote them if I hadn’t known prior. There was no exotic features, crazy storyline, and belligerent characters. They were normal folk short stories. Of the two short stories, I found “The Pongo’s Dream” by Jose Maria Arguedas the most interesting. It was short, simple, and powerful. What I find in old folk tales is that they always address a moral. When I was young, my mom would always tell me Chinese folk tales on how the most righteous person in this life will be reborn into someone great in the next. Which, is somewhat similar to “The Pongo’s Dream”.

What I found different about “Legend of the Singing Tablets” “Legend of the Crystal Mask” “Legend of the Silent Bell” and “Legend of the Dancing Butchers” by Miguel Angel Asturias from “The Pongo’s Dream” was how religious it was. It seemed to me that there was also a large focus on nature. I found this surprisingly consistent with most of Asian folk stories that I read. It really is interesting on how while these cultures were created thousands of kilometers apart, their stories are strikingly similar. Religion, nature and duty is a theme in a lot of them.

Is Trump an Effective Leader?

Trump. The man who since January 20th 2017, became the president of the most powerful nation in the world. While his policies are up for debate, what I want to know is whether or not he’s an effective leader. Through the span of a few short days, Trump has blocked immigrants of seven countries from entering the United States, blocked funding for abortion, withdrew from the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal, and encouraged the construction of two pipelines. There is no denying that he’s accomplished a lot in the past few days. However, whether or not it will bring positive change is up for debate.

Nevertheless, does all this change make Trump an effective leader? In my opinion, I don’t believe that he’s an effective leader that will be able to manage the country well. In an opinion article, “With Donald Trump, the word ‘lie’ finally enters the mainstream media lexicon” Neil Macdonald argues that President Trump employs falsehoods on a level never seen before. In class, we talked about how organizational behavior is a field of study that investigates the impact of individuals, groups, and structure on behavior within organizations. So, to say a country is one large organization isn’t blowing things out of proportion in my opinion. Now, the reason why I don’t believe Trump is going to be an effective leader is because he ‘lies’. In chapter six of my organizational behavior textbook, there’s a section in which it talks about the importance of trust. Without the climate of trust, a team (the government) will not be able perform well.

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump speaks to supporters as he takes the stage for a campaign event in Dallas, Monday, Sept. 14, 2015. (AP Photo/LM Otero)

Additionally, while he has been able to accomplish a lot as of now, I don’t think the American people will follow a leader who is an untrustworthy role model. By lying, not only has he harmed his administration, he has also harmed the very people who put him in office. The United States is just a blown-up version of an organization. And it is now Trump’s duty as president of the organization to lead the people effectively and justly.

Sources:

With Donald Trump, the word ‘lie’ finally enters the mainstream media lexicon: Opinion. (2017). CBC News. Retrieved 29 January 2017, from http://www.cbc.ca/news/opinion/donald-trump-lies-1.3955331

Prokop, A. (2017). Trump has been president for a week. Here’s what he’s done so far.. Vox. Retrieved 29 January 2017, from http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/1/27/14370594/donald-trump-policies-accomplishments-achievements

Gauthier, B. (2017). Report: Donald Trump broke Cuba embargo, knowingly conducted illegal business in Communist country. Salon. Retrieved 29 January 2017, from http://www.salon.com/2016/09/29/report-donald-trump-broke-cuba-embargo-knowingly-conducted-illegal-business-in-communist-country/

Kitchen Nightmares

During my very unproductive winter break, I became super engrossed in a TV series called “Kitchen Nightmares”. It’s a show hosted by Gordan Ramsey in which he travels around the country to help dysfunctional restaurants get back afloat. While most restaurant owners were open to constructive criticism, there were a certain few who were not capable of accepting the fact that their business was not doing well.

While watching the show, it occurred to me that the main reason the restaurants were dysfunctional was because of the lack of motivation among the employees. Employees of dysfunctional restaurants said that there was no incentive to work hard and that the only reason they worked there was because of the pay. After reading the textbook and going to class, I found that there were actually different ways to motivate your employees and increase productivity. A perfect theory that applies to the situation is the “Motivation-Hygiene Theory” which was proposed by psychologist Frederick Herzberg. The theory basically states that intrinsic factors are related to job satisfaction and extrinsic factors are relate to dissatisfaction.

When I applied this theory to “Kitchen Nightmares”, I was able to see the fundamental reason why people weren’t motivated. They were under-payed, poorly treated, and were on bad terms with their manager. These extrinsic factors caused widespread dissatisfaction which led to poor performance and/or quitting. After identifying key performance issues, Gordan Ramsey made a set of changes to the restaurants in order for them to get back on track. Looking back in retrospect, I realized that the changes he made were in actuality all extrinsic factors. These changes, although helped mitigate the dissatisfaction among employees, was a huge step towards the right direction. Furthermore, at the end of each episode, viewers were shown the state of the restaurants a few months after the changes. Those which stuck to the changes saw their fortunes turn for the better while those who couldn’t accept the change sunk back into obscurity.

“Kitchen Nightmares” is a perfect example of how motivation can make or break an organization.

Sources:

TV Detail – fanart.tv. (2017). fanart.tv. Retrieved 29 January 2017, from https://fanart.tv/series/80552/kitchen-nightmares/

Reaction to LAST 201 Readings 2

 

This particular reading was immensely long. However, the language used here was definitely easier to understand than Borges, Keesing, and Williams. To me, I feel like this is the first real reading for this course. Mainly because for the previous readings, we mainly focused on “what is the people” and “what is culture”. With this reading, we finally focused on “what is popular culture in Latin America”. That isn’t to say the previous readings didn’t help me better understand what this course was focusing on.

The first part of the chapter of this article talks about how the Andean region, Mexico, and Brazil have given rise to specific forms of popular culture. With the age of colonization, Europeans, specifically Portuguese and Spanish came to the America’s to colonize. They destroyed the native civilizations through their superior weaponry, and disease. However, one thing remained intact. Something the settlers eventually took in and called their own. And that was the culture. The native cultures of the Andean region, Mexico and Brazil blended with the cultures of the respective settlers and gave rise to their own specific form of popular culture. Each distinct in its own way.

The second part of the chapter talks about urban popular culture. In “Studies in Latin American Popular Culture” the only academic journal dedicated to Latin America Popular Culture, defines “popular” as urban mass culture. However, personally, I believe that popular culture shouldn’t be confined to a specific region. I think that within one large area, there are numerous forms of popular culture. Of course, through the advancement in technology, popular culture has somewhat become standardized as more people have access to the same content. The reading also stresses how the media has been vital to a consolidated single national identity.

Although this reading was long and somewhat tiresome to read, it had tons of good information in it.

Rajon Rondo and the Dallas Mavericks

Sports teams are a perfect example of a group working together to try and achieve a common goal. With each new season, new players come into the lineup and the team has to go through the five stages of “Forming, norming, storming, performing and adjourning”. In order for a team to compete as one cohesive group, all players on the team need to understand their roles and place on the team. Furthermore, management needs to be able to settle any potential player disputes while maintaining the group dynamics.

Rajon Rondo is a perfect example of how a player can affect the whole group. Rajon Rondo is a gifted point guard who distributes the ball exceptionally well. And when he’s on top of his game, he’s a force to be reckoned with. However, his on-court and off-court behavior led him to be alienated by his team and as a result, traded the next offseason. During Rajon Rondo’s season with the Dallas Mavericks, he constantly clashed with management and demonstrated poor behavior. Personally, I feel that Rajon Rondo didn’t know his role on the team. This, on top with his poor behavior caused him to storm with the talented team that he was on. So, while the individual talents of each player are amazing, they weren’t able to work as one cohesive group during games. This was indicated through the Dallas Mavericks’ record in the league in which they are were surprisingly placed 8th out of 15 in the highly competitive western conference. However, the Mavericks were defeated by the San Antonio Spurs in the first round. Furthermore, Rajon Rondo was benched numerous times during the critical situations because of his inability to listen to the coach. So, in conclusion, while individual talents are important to the success of a group, the ability to work together is what matters most.

Sources:

Alsher, J. (2015). NBA: How the Dallas Mavericks Fell Apart. The Cheat Sheet. Retrieved 29 January 2017, from http://www.cheatsheet.com/sports/how-the-dallas-mavericks-fell-apart.html/?a=viewall

My reactions to the readings

 

At the beginning of the course, I thought that I had a thorough understanding of what culture was. I thought culture was displayed through the arts, like dance, music, food, and paintings. However, after reading the assigned readings, I was just confused. I’m not sure whether or not if it’s just me but I found the readings to be particularly difficult. I found myself rereading paragraphs just to somewhat grasp the meaning behind the text. After spending an hour deciphering the text, I came to class the next day confident that I knew what was going on. But ironically enough, I had no idea. Luckily for me, the in-class discussions really helped me understand the meaning behind the word ‘culture’. What I thought was a word that just implied an ethnicities art form ended up being a word that encompassed far more than I had ever thought. It has come to my attention that there is still so much for me to learn about this course.

However, in regards to Jorge Luis Borges, “A Celebration of the Monster”, I found his writing particularly interesting. It was very descriptive but also somewhat elusive. He described the scenes in such clarity that I found myself reliving his story, however, upon finishing, I never really understood who or what the monster really was. I may be wrong but from my understanding of the story, the “monster” they are referring to is the movement. A certain movement that involves shooting and killing a Jew.

Evita Peron’s “My Message” definitely struck a chord within me. Her writing was grand, and filled with passion as she recounts her battles with her husband. I liked Peron’s writing more enjoyable than Borges, mainly because of the difficulty surrounding Borges’ writing. In the midst, of reading Peron’s writing, it struck to me the similarities between the two works. To me, it seemed as if Peron and Borges were writing the two sides of the same coin. However, I am not 100% sure about my hypothesis.

LAST 201 Preliminary Blog

Hi, my name is Julian Shi. I’m a first year commerce student. I was born and raised in Vancouver, but was sent to boarding school in New York at the age of 12. I stayed in New York for seven years while enrolled in the school’s music department. I’m excited to learn more about popular culture in Latin America!

Practice Blog

 

  1. Machiavellian (33) above average
  2. Self-Monitor (50) below average
  3. Emotional Intelligence (74) above average
  4. Narcissism (14) below average

By being above average in both Machiavellianism and emotional intelligence, I am more cunning, scheming and calculating than the average human being. I am also more adept in handling interpersonal relationships by being aware of one’s emotions. However, I am below average in both narcissism and self-monitoring. This means that I do not monitor my audience as often as others do to ensure appropriate behavior and I am not nearly as infatuated with myself as the average human being.

By scoring above average in both Machiavellian and emotional intelligence, it really helps with my ability to work with others because I am able to gauge how my peers are feeling at that instant. By gauging the collective feel of the group, I am able to confidently decide the period of time where my peers are most receptive to new ideas. Additionally, by being low in narcissism, I won’t have an incessant need for attention. However, the one trait which might negatively affect my ability to work with others is my low sense of self-monitoring. More often than not, when I am engrossed in a topic, I will run with it. This might negatively impact the group environment because I might not at the outset realize that the group has already collectively shown disinterest or negative attitudes towards the ideas I am engrossed with. So, with my reported personality scores, my ability to work with others is a double-edged sword.