Classmate: Navid Panah
Task 11: Detain Release
Link: https://blogs.ubc.ca/metprogramnp/2025/03/17/weekly-task-11-detain-release/
When reflecting on Navid’s post, I see how his experience in the “detain and release” task highlights the fluidity of internal biases and the challenges posed by flawed algorithms. He shared how his perspective shifted throughout the activity—starting with a belief in fairness by releasing low-risk individuals, only to notice patterns that prompted him to prioritize detainment. For example, released drug offenders frequently failed to appear for court, while seemingly less dangerous offenses like fraud occasionally escalated into violent crimes. His post emphasizes the limitations of algorithms, which often neglect nuanced decision-making, and critiques how biases in AI systems can lead to unjust outcomes. Ultimately, he stresses the importance of human oversight in decision-making, arguing that AI and algorithms should only assist, not dictate, judgments.
When connecting Navid’s post to mine, I notice shared concerns about biases inherent in AI systems. We both recognize how these systems, built on historical data, risk perpetuating inequality. I especially resonate with his emphasis on keeping final judgment in human hands—a point I also made in my post when advocating for ethical oversight and the integration of compassion and critical thinking.
By linking my post to Navid’s, I aim to create a web of interconnected perspectives that deepen collective understanding. Together, our insights emphasize AI’s dual potential: its capacity to innovate while demanding vigilance against harm. This interplay underscores the importance of maintaining ethical awareness and human judgment in technology’s integration.