Is it acceptable to “make” the dogs compete? Why not just train them for fun? Is competition really necessary?
As we have covered, there is a large amount of stress associated with trials. So, how can we justify competing? Certainly, there are dogs that thrive in the trial environment and it offers yet another opportunity to perform that activity which may be at a level where it is self-reinforcing. Dogs are not able to tell us if they want to trial that day. By being aware of signals of distress and discomfort, handlers can be much better prepared to decide whether to continue with the event that day. But what about the handlers agenda?
Trials are highly reinforcing for the humans too!
- It provides an opportunity to test and show off all the hard work one has put into training,
- Another opportunity to develop the bond with the dog
- An opportunity for social interaction and making new friends
- Ribbons and titles!
What about the handlers that take competition too far? What happens when it becomes ONLY about the ribbons? Thankfully, this is not the norm. The majority of participants report the main motivations for competing are the added opportunities of playing with their dogs, the physical activity and the social aspects (Farrell et. al., 2015). Although the motivations may vary depending on the level and intensity of competition. Handlers only focused on the external motivations like titles and ribbons may overlook signs of illness, distress or a lack of enjoyment from the dog.
