One for One. Digital image. Toms: One for One. N.p., n.d. Web. 19 Nov. 2015.
I’m opposed to the one-for-one business model for a two main reasons.
The first being how it can, and has, replaced local producers. Coming from a small town in Oregon, we’ve always supported the saying “shop local.” Although local goods are clearly pricier than non-local and – of course – free goods, someone is still putting in the time and effort to produce it. The one-on-one model takes away so many income opportunities – simply because consumers pay double the price to think they’re helping ‘solve’ problems around the world.
The second reason is because, in the long run, the one for one model doesn’t actually fix anything. I mean, yes, donating shoes is a wholesome action, but shoes don’t last forever. And what people in these situations really need is a stronger and more developed economy. Also, when people start to rely on the one-for-one model, they forget how to fend for themselves.
I do appreciate Toms’ philanthropy statement, per say, but I just don’t think it’s the right way.
External Sources:
“The Broken.” Co.Exist. N.p., 10 Apr. 2012. Web. 16 Nov. 2015.
“The One-for-one Business Model: Avoiding Unintended Consequences.” KnowledgeWharton The Oneforone Business Model Avoiding Unintended Consequences Comments. N.p., n.d. Web. 16 Nov. 2015.
