Writing Process
The purpose of the technical definition assignment is to practice writing three definitions for a technical term for a non-technical audience. I chose “object recognition” for my technical term because it bridges computer science and neuroscience. I found writing the expanded definitions the most challenging because I wanted to be selective and concise, while differentiating the term accurately. I am proud of my analysis of parts because I created a clear and complete picture of object recognition along with a visual for support.
Peer Reviewing
I had the pleasure of reviewing Ali Hasan’s technical definition assignment on “programming.” Ali did an excellent job in organization, which improved the flow and readability. I was impressed with Ali’s methodical and straight-forward writing style. Additionally, it was evident to me that Ali has a very clear idea of the term and persuaded the target audience. Peer reviewing was a great opportunity for me to think critically on my peer’s work and provide constructive feedback.
Self-Editing
Ali provided great recommendations on how to improve my work. For example, I restructured some longer sentences to avoid run-on sentences. Additionally, I included a conclusion to emphasize the future implications of object recognition. I appreciate Ali’s perspective and I learned to think more analytically of my work in order to strengthen my writing skills. By exchanging assignments with a peer, I got a different perspective and received strategies on how to be communicate my meaning more effectively.
Final Thoughts
A major takeaway point from this assignment is the importance of peer review. I think peer review is valuable because it’s an opportunity to critically engage with the assignment. I look forward to feeling more comfortable in expressing and receiving feedback with my teammates throughout the term.