Organizational Culture

In every organization, there is a culture that plays an important role in shaping the beliefs and behaviours of the organization.  We have learnt in class that organizations can have a dominant culture – which are core shared values, and also subcultures.

I personally think that having a very strong positive organizational culture is very important – where employees within that organization are given recognition and are valued for their contribution, and where there is emphasis on open communication between different hierarchy levels.

Another point I would like to add is that, I think that organizational cultures should be dynamic and constantly changing.  As an organization grows, there are bound to be changes in the management and employees.  With those changes, it is important to note that the culture of the organization has to change in accordance to ensure stability or further growth in the organization.

I found this article by Michael Watkins in the Harvard Business Review, though it is a few years old, I still think that the content is very informative and relevant to what we have learnt in our COMM 292 classes.  In the article, Watkins shares different perspectives of what an organizational culture is, from information he gathered through a discussion he set up on LinkedIn.

A particularly interesting point and a new perspective to me in the article I found was when he mentions that organizational culture works like the human immune system where it “prevents wrong thinking and wrong people from entering the organization”.  It appealed to me because I have not thought about organizational culture in this way, I have always thought of organizational culture as only what already happens within a business.

Word Count 278

Sources:

“What is Organizational Culture?  And Why Should We Care?”  Harvard Business Review.  15 May 2013  <https://hbr.org/2013/05/what-is-organizational-culture>

My Communication Style

In class, we learnt about four different styles of communication which are action oriented, process oriented, people oriented, and idea oriented.

I think the communication style that I fit into the most is being people oriented.  People oriented communication is where people talk about relationships between individuals, needs, awareness, feelings, and valuing team spirit.  I highly value the human connection I get when communicating with others.  I also enjoy the idea of working in teams.  When I am put into a group, I always try my best to establish a team spirit because I believe that when a team spirit is establish, a common goal is as well, the group as a whole would be more motivated to achieve the best they can and the group can be more effective when trying to reach their goals.

However, I feel like my style of communication also fits into the action oriented category because I am a very driven person with a strong personality.  I like to be given a clear set of objectives and I enjoy carrying out my responsibilities efficiently.  One of the best parts about working in teams for me is when every individual member carries out their responsibilities and we are able to see clear results.

Word Count 208

Managers and Leaders

Before coming to Sauder and learning about human resources and managements, I have always assumed that a leader and a manager do the same thing.  But, after learning and reading more into the subject, I have learnt that they play completely separate roles.

The main takeaway I had from the lecture on leadership in our class was that managers are people who set day to day objectives and goals, delegate workload, and maintain a good workforce environment, whilst leaders are people who are innovative and unique, who have vision for the future, growth and development of the organization.

I also came across a very informative article on Forbes that outlines “9 Differences Between Being a Leader and a Manager”.

In my opinion, one of the best points in the article was, “leaders are change agents, managers maintain the status quo”, where it says that leaders are “proud disrupters” and can “accept the fact that changes to the system often create waves”.  I really enjoyed this because I personally adopt the mentality that well planned and well executed change, no matter of what magnitude, can bring about better outcomes, even if there are many road bumps along the way.  To me, the hard work and struggles are what make the process of me doing any task worthwhile, and also makes me feel more accomplished at the end of the day.

The rest of the article basically implies that managers are more systematic people whilst leaders have a voice and are more outspoken.  Having said that, I do think that both leaders and managers are essential for any organization to be successful.

Word Count 269

Sources:

“9 Differences Between Being A Leader And A Manager.”  Forbes.  15 Nov, 2016.  <https://www.forbes.com/sites/williamarruda/2016/11/15/9-differences-between-being-a-leader-and-a-manager/#799193bf4609>

Working in Teams

Source: Google Images

After reading Kexuan’s post on teamwork, I do agree with her on the point that group members should have effective communication and problem solving skills.  Additionally, I think that each team member should be responsible and accountable in completing their delegated tasks and be willing to go further if it were needed.  It is essential that team members establish a common goal so that the whole team would be more motivated to work towards achieving that common goal – since higher motivation levels would lead to higher quality performance.

From reading the article on Forbes about teamwork linked on Kexuan’s post, I would say that my team type is a “real team”, where teams establish a culture of their own and they perform tasks in a way which are most effective for each member.

I have always preferred working in teams over individual work because I think that working in a functional team produces the most efficient results as tasks are delegated to each member according to their own individual strengths.  Furthermore, a group of people working together is more likely to produce more innovative and creative ideas as people come from different backgrounds with varying perspectives.  I also think that working in a team is good because team members can provide each other with support and guidance whenever they encounter hardships.  However, I do also believe that certain projects would be more efficient if they were to be completed individually.

Word Count – 240

Sources:

Romero, Luis E.  “What Everyone Should Know About Teamwork.”  Forbes.com.  20 Jan. 2016.  <http://www.forbes.com/sites/luisromero/2016/01/20/what-everyone-should-know-about-teamwork/#55c5fbe21663>

The Importance of Diversity in the Workplace

I personally think that one of the key factors in having a successful company is to have a diverse workforce and an understanding management team.

To me, a diverse workforce consists of people from different cultural backgrounds, genders, interests, sexual orientations and so on.  When a diverse group of people come together in a group, it would be highly beneficial to the company as the workforce can attend to a larger clientele effectively as the differences in each individual member’s perspective can aid when trying to produce a creative or unique idea, ultimately improving the whole team’s performance.

Other than that, I think having a diverse workforce is very important because the world is becoming more integrated as more and more cultures are given exposure.  However, every situation has its drawbacks.

I came across an article in the Economist that talks about the “diversity fatigue” which outlines the challenges of diversity in the workforce.  One particular statement I found interesting in the article was quoted by David Livermore who said diverse groups are “more likely to produce truly innovative ideas, but they are also more likely to fail completely,” linking it to how trust is the biggest challenge in diverse groups.

Perhaps some groups fall apart because some of the group members may think that their fellow members’ methods of performing certain tasks are skewed or incorrect because they are from a completely different background and are not used to the way things are being done differently.

Overall, I still think that diversity should be highly valued in the workforce and additionally, I think having a high cultural intelligence – a term introduced by Elaine Mosakowski of the University of Colorado which basically means that a person is able to work effectively across cultures, is essential for building a diverse team.

Word Count 300

Sources:

“Diversity Fatigue.”  The Economist.  11 Feb, 2016.  <http://www.economist.com/news/business/21692865-making-most-workplace-diversity-requires-hard-work-well-good-intentions-diversity>

What Really Motivates People?

Source: Dan Pink

Many research studies have been conducted in attempt to analyze what motivates workers.  Traditionally, pay and benefits were considered to be the most important factors for motivating employees.  Nowadays, work enjoyment, challenges and recognition are some of the many factors frequently quoted by employees when asked what keeps them motivated.  I came across a very interesting article on ideas.ted.com summarizing seven insightful studies that outline the non-financial factors of motivation.

One point that stood out was: “The promise of helping others makes us more likely to follow rules”.  What stood out to me wasn’t the concept of helping others but rather how effective the study was – by putting up signs at a hospital’s hand-washing stations, doctors and nurses used 45% more soap or hand sanitizer in the stations with signs.  It was surprising to me because I personally don’t respond to signs that much.  I guess every person responds to a motivation factor differently.

However, I can definitely relate to the point: “The harder a project is, the prouder we feel of it”.  Every time I finish a challenging task, I feel incredibly proud because I feel like I have gone through the worst and as a result, I am motivated to work even harder on future projects.

I think that the fourth point: “Knowing that our work helps others may increase our unconscious motivation”, is tied to McClelland’s motivational needs theory under the “n-achievement” in which a person is motivated by the need for a sense of accomplishment through seeking challenging goals and there is a constant need for feedback regarding process and achievement.

After reading through the various factors of motivation, I would definitely like to find out more about what motivates my friends or the people around me to work hard.

Word Count: 293

Sources:

Gross, Jessica.  “What Motivates Us At Work? More Than Money.”  Ideas.Ted.Com.  21 May, 2015.  <http://ideas.ted.com/what-motivates-us-at-work-7-fascinating-studies-that-give-insights/>

One for One?

We’ve learnt in class that when a business has corporate social responsibility, it adopts a certain set of values involving initiatives or practices that hold a benefit towards society.  This could be done through addressing economic or social issues, and legislative issues perhaps such as labour laws.

I was inspired to learn more about CSR because of Grace’s post about Starbucks’ corporate social responsibility initiative.  From her post, I can definitely agree that CSR can be used as a powerful marketing tool which can enhance a brand’s image greatly however, I hold a more skeptical view of major corporations and their CSR initiatives.  Personally, I wouldn’t view Starbucks as any different after learning about their initiatives because I know that my purchase is not directly going to fund their CSR.

After reading her post, I looked up other companies who are actively participating in their CSR initiatives.  A company that I came across was TOMS.  One of the company’s CSR initiative is the “one for one concept” where the company promises to donate a pair of shoes to a child in need whenever they sell a pair of shoes.  This has not only helped the impoverished children but the brand has also created over 700 jobs; with an equal ratio of male to female employees, in the regions where they donate their shoes.

From my point of view, the whole initiative just seems too good to be true.  Having studied Economics and Global Development for the past 2 years, I highly question the effectiveness of the company’s initiative as I believe that it might actually have a negative impact the development of the impoverished nations. 

By providing large amounts of aid to the countries, TOMS is simply hindering development and making the countries reliant on aid.  The company claims to provide employment to the local community by setting up factories in developing nations however, that could easily be used as an excuse for the company to exploit the natural resources used and also to take advantage of lower wage systems.  Furthermore, by producing in the developing nations, the local markets would be disrupted – local shoemakers would be replaced by a large Western corporation; which is TOMS.

We as consumers have to be thorough in our research before purchasing a product because we have the choice to choose between putting our money into something that will have a positive impact on the community or giving our money to major transnational corporations at the expense of local corporations.

Word Count: 414

Sources:

C.W. “Putting the Boot in Development.” The Economist. 27 October. 2014 <http://www.economist.com/blogs/freeexchange/2014/10/economics-toms-shoes>

TOM’s production. <http://www.toms.com/production>

TOM’s One for One Campaign. <http://www.toms.fr/gift-of-shoes/>

The Security Issue

apple-logo-blackJacqueline’s post touched upon the fiasco between Apple and the FBI which happened after the San Bernardino shootings where the FBI asked Apple to develop a software in order for the FBI to unlock the shooter’s iPhone – which Apple refused but the FBI managed to unlock the phone in the end.

Through reading her post, I do agree with her view that Apple did the right thing by sticking to their policy and protecting the privacy of their customers, however I don’t quite agree with her suggestion of a rule for the company to only unlock a specific phone to avoid allowing the FBI access to people’s phones.  This is because I think that once a software is developed to unlock a phone, it will always be there.  The company can claim that the software would only work on one certain device however if the algorithm was already developed, it will inevitably be misused, perhaps hackers might gain access or even employees within the company might leak the software or “sell” it to a different source.  If this occurs, Apple’s customers’ safety would be highly compromised and it could bring about a large amount of bad publicity.

I did some further research on this issue and came across the Scientific American’s blogpost.  The post briefly outlines the issue at hand and also talks about the increasing uncertainty and threats of the protection of our privacy through social media or most big tech companies.

In the post, it was also mentioned that companies such as WhatsApp and Google are “doubling down” on their data encryption.  However, even with all the so-called advanced data encryption promised, I am still skeptical and I take the Snowden view that the government has the ability to access all the personal information that is put online.

I strongly agree with the closing statement that, “tech companies and law enforcement should be focusing more on new models of data protection and access that build rather than erode trust in the system”.  I think that if the tech companies collaborated with law enforcement to develop these new models of data protection, they must provide complete transparency in order for consumers to feel comfortable and safe with the privacy protection.  Perhaps they could do this by outlining how the data protection software was formulated and provide complete disclosure if the law enforcement is allowed to access certain information in the consumers’ phones.

All in all, I think that both posts I’ve mentioned were interesting and insightful to read. 

Word Count: 419

Sources:

Skilton, Mark. “What the Apple versus FBI Debacle Taught Us.” Scientific American. 20 May. 2016 <https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/what-the-apple-versus-fbi-debacle-taught-us/>

Image:

http://logok.org/apple-logo/

If you ever need a furry friend

Hong Kong has its own fair share of pet cafes, catering to dog and cat lovers.  However, co-founder of Rabbitland Cafe, Ricky Lam, was inspired to open up the first ever rabbit cafe in Hong Kong after falling in love with rabbits following a visit to Okunoshima, Japan’s famous ‘rabbit island’.

Located in the busy commercial district of Causeway Bay, Rabbitland Cafe is home to 12 rescued rabbits, most of them have been abandoned by previous owners.  Rabbitland Cafe is a place where people can have fun spending time and playing with the rabbits whilst enjoying drinks and light snacks.  In addition to that, one of the co-founders, Teddy Chui, claims that, “a lot of parents bring their kids here if they want to buy a rabbit, so they know it’s not all about playing with them – it’s a lot of work and responsibility”.

39556425_-_19_08_2016_-_hong_kong-lifestyle-animal-rabbit-cafe_1

Photo credit: AFP/Getty Images 

The trend of pet cafes began in Taipei, Taiwan – the first one named “Cat Flower Garden” opened in 1998.  The popularity of pet cafes spread rapidly – especially in newly industrialized East Asian countries such as South Korea, Japan and Hong Kong, and more recently spreading to Singapore.

The rise in popularity of pet cafes in Asia can be explained by the extremely high living costs.  Many residents can only afford to live in small apartments or condominiums and most of these buildings may not allow pets.  The working culture in Asia could also serve as an explanation for the rise in pet cafes.  In countries like South Korea and Japan, it is not unusual for people to work twelve hours or more in a day.  Long working hours and a small living space is not the ideal combination for raising and keeping pets.

This is where the pet cafes come into play.  These cafes mainly target customers who love animals but are not able to keep their own pets, and the businesses aim to provide their customers with the feeling of companionship and comfort from having a pet.  Pet cafes are also a popular destination for tourists as the concept is unique to Asia, although the trend is slowly making its way to Europe and North America.

 

Word Count: 363

Sources:

http://www.ctvnews.ca/lifestyle/hong-kong-s-rabbit-cafe-hops-onto-high-street-1.3039708

Can Samsung Bounce Back?

Samsung hasn’t been looking very well lately. The release of the Samsung Note 7 has stirred up major controversy as reports of batteries overheating and exploding surfaced – which even led to the Federal Aviation Administration (FDAA) advising against packing the cellphones into checked baggage. The recall of 2.5 million units of the exploding Note 7 cellphones has been dubbed,

“the smartphone industry’s biggest recall to date” – Wall Street Journal

On Friday, September 9th, the company’s market value dropped by more than $10 billion, and dropped another $15.9 billion the following Monday.  Aside from the major drop in shares, there has been many reports speculating that the cash costs of the recall is estimated at $1 billion.

Note 7 Recall Costs

Image courtesy of Forbes

The Note 7 catastrophe does not only bring harm towards the company in a financial stance, but more importantly, their brand image and reputation would be heavily affected.  In my personal opinion, the short-term financial losses suffered by the company now are minuscule compared to a loss in customer loyalty and confidence; which may potentially have a larger effect on the business in the long term.

Even though Samsung claims to have solved the issue of defective batteries,  putting the Note 7 back on the market very soon, some consumers (like myself) might still be wary of the product.  The possibility of losing consumers is very high especially since the smartphone and technology market is growing at such a rapid pace, and also the company’s largest competitor, Apple, has just recently released the new iPhone 7.

The brand has not been able to recover completely from the crisis yet, especially because of the recent reports of exploding top-loading washing machines from the company.  And prior to that, the company has already recalled 70,000 washing machines in Australia after claims of the machines causing fire.

Perhaps the full-blown disasters indicate that it would be an appropriate time for Samsung to conduct a SWOT analysis on the approach they should take to come back up into the market.

I think that the company should invest more into its operations department.  They should be focusing more in the quality control section – for example, conducting more tests on the products before they are released into the market.  Aside from that, the company should also invest more into its research and development department in order to develop better ways to engineer or produce their products to ensure a higher safety standard.

Word Count 396