Task 3: Voice to Text

Oral Story

On Thursday I had a women’s league basketball game I was on my way from coaching and so I was running out of gas I didn’t notice until about halfway to my basketball game and I looked down at my gas tank and realized that I was on one bar and of course I was not very close to getting to the gym I started to panic and coasting try not to use my AC I put my windows up even though I have no idea if that actually affects my gas use and then I took a wrong turn because I was thinking about my gas and instead of getting to the gym quickly and ensuring that I didn’t run out of gas I actually prolonged my travel time luckily I made it to the gym and I chatted with all my teammates about the situation and how far I may be able to get on my gas tank our basketball game went well we played a current UBC basketball player and she was playing against all of us old ladies and it was really fun to see someone that is currently in University playing where I was quite a while ago we ended up winning the game by 15 points and it’s just a really nice social fun atmosphere where I get to see all of my friends and get a good workout in after the game I had to map where the nearest gas station was and a teammate followed me while I got to it I felt like I was about to fully run out and it was the closest I’ve ever been but luckily I made it to the station paid an astronomical amount for gas and filled up my tank and then drove home and called my sister to decide what was for dinner and we made omelets with lots of cheese I had a nice delicious bubbly water and then we watched our favorite reality TV show after that I went to bed for much-needed I woke up the next day I’m super sore because I’m now not as young as I used to be and my knees always get a bit sore after playing overall not a bad Thursday night

The story above has not been altered in any way after the speech-to-text process (using https://speechnotes.co/). Grammatical and spelling mistakes are all included as originally seen.

Reflection

For this exercise I found myself speaking differently than I normally would if I was telling this to a friend. I found it difficult to just come up with a story on the spot which is why my story is so boring and seemingly about nothing. If I had time to script the story, it would make more sense and flow much better. What is “wrong” with the text is the punctuation. I spoke with pauses however the written text does not account for this making it an entire run on sentence. I consider these mistakes because without the punctuation it impacts the story and how I intended to share it with the listener. This could change the meaning or message that I was conveying. I also notice with other voice to text applications that often words are autocorrected to choose words that are proper English words but which make little sense in the sentence. If I had scripted the story it would have been much more logical with less repetition and more polished because I could revise it as I went. This made it clear how much oral storytelling differs from written storytelling. Oral first of all does not require the listener to be literate. The story can also be adjusted to suit the specific audience so there is the ability to make it more personal or interesting based on who is listening. This is not the case for written stories however the benefit to written is that they include more description and detail to make it more interesting to read. “Writing is generally done more deliberately than speaking, so finished written pieces are much more carefully crafted than a typical spoken sentence” (Gnanadesikan, 2011). Reading what I was saying I really noticed I almost gave no description like I would through writing. The largest difference to written and oral storytelling is that written can be read verbatim rather than from memory. As Walter Ong (2002) discusses, reciting something of great length verbatim is impossible for the human brain. So, although it could be memorized and recited verbatim, by writing it down it ensures each reader would get the exact same information no matter how many times my uninteresting and monotonous story was read.

References:

Gnanadesikan, A.E. (2011). The first IT revolution. In The writing revolution: Cuneiform to the Internet (pp. 1-12). John Wiley & Sons. 

Ong, W.J. (2002). Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the wordLinks to an external site.. Routledge. (Original work published 1982).

Linking Assignment

Link #1

I was drawn to Shannon’s blog because it was visually appealing, easy to navigate, and told me immediately what her story was about. I find it hard to engage with material that I do not connect with however, in Shannon’s oral story she spoke about her dog. I also appreciated that we had similar experiences with the task while she also made points that I had not thought of. In a course that is exclusively online, I enjoyed looking at someone else’s work to see what their MET experience looks like.

Link #2

I chose to respond to Joti’s post because it was similar to my experience in a way that made me feel more comfortable in this course. I think it is easy to doubt yourself sometimes. I made an error with this potato stamp and although it was a very small and seemingly silly error, I found that reading Joti’s similar experience made me feel connected to my peers. Since this course is entirely online and there are no standard discussion forums I enjoyed reading peoples blogs in order to feel a part of the great group.

Link 3 https://jotisingh.weebly.com/tasks/mode-bending#comments

I commented on Joti’s post because I thought it was really creative and I had not used the tool she chose before. I also thought that she spoke to a practical side of the task which resonated with me and my daily life as a teacher. Her combination of multimodal elements, such as audio and interactive components, highlighted innovative ways to enhance student engagement and communication. This approach aligns with my interest in exploring new digital tools and methods to enrich my teaching. Additionally, Joti’s reflections on the technical and cultural aspects of the task provided valuable insights into how these strategies can be applied effectively in an educational setting, prompting me to consider how I might incorporate similar techniques into my own work.

Link 4 https://blogs.ubc.ca/texttech540/2024/08/04/task-12-speculative-futures/#comment-15

I wrote this comment because Lachelle’s story really hit home for me. The way it showed a future where climate disasters have isolated people and limited real human interaction made me think about my own fears about environmental collapse. It reminded me of how isolated and disconnected many of us felt during COVID-19, where virtual connections often felt hollow in comparison to in-person interactions. Reading her story made me realize how important it is to appreciate and make the most of our ability to connect with people face-to-face. It’s a good reminder of what we might lose if we don’t take care of our environment and to appreciate the freedoms we can often take for granted.

Task 2: Does Language Shape The Way We Think?

As I watched Lera Borditsky’s (2017) lecture, I was surprised by some points she made, interested in others, and related personally to a few. I am not bilingual and have actually struggled in learning other languages. In my teaching I have not taught an EAL course, however I do try to make adjustments to my lessons to better accommodate students whose primary language is not English. This lecture had me thinking primarily about those students, trying to put myself in their shoes.

[05:05] Why do some languages not have numbers or colours? It is interesting to think how often these are used to describe or understand something. Perhaps these cultures do not value these as much and may rely more on estimation or practical values rather than exact numbers.

[11:32] How people organize time. This is another concept I had never thought of before this lecture. Perhaps a very narrow minded outlook, I just assumed this was somewhat universal. I found it interesting how the language you read (left to right etc) impacts how you organize time. I particularly liked her example of the logo for diapers being read differently in Arabic. A small example that points to the potential for much greater misunderstanding across cultures.

[15:05]  It is almost hard to understand how many different ways language can be understood and represented. For example, the use in some languages to utilize cardinal direction or more exact locationAs someone who has never taught EAL this has me thinking about my students and how I may better be able to support them when they are learning English within my courses.

[24:00] I thought this discussion on language attributing different gender to certain words really interesting. Most notably, the underestimation of threat that hurricanes with female names pose. I personally relate to gender impacting how people perceive you in both personal and professional arenas. This shows just how engrained these gender stereotypes are in society.

[35:00] Mathematics is often seen as the universal language however she makes it clear that it is different around the world and in different cultures. I found it very hard to believe that some languages do not have words for exact numbers. I am respectful of others and their backgrounds however I am wondering if this could this be linked to lack of education or do they find no need for this type of language? However, if you have not learned or experienced this type of communication, you must not be able to think about numbers and quantities in the same way? It is hard to even imagine how different my daily communication would be without numerical texts and communication.

[45:00]  Language allows us to think about the world differently but we do not often think about these difference. This is very true and applicable to schools and teaching.

[57:00] I think this is my biggest take away from the presentation. An audience member asked “is texting changing language?” Borditsky (2017) responds stating that language is continuously changing and evolving. This change in communication that texting and other social media forms bring are not something to be afraid of as this shift through generations is inevitable. I think this was a very informative lecture that opened my mind to looking at language and how it is extremely connected to the way we think.

 

References:

Boroditsky, L. (2011). How language shapes thoughtScientific American, 304(2), 62-65.

Task 1: What’s In Your Bag?

My name is Kristjana Young and I am a secondary school teacher in the Coquitlam school district, currently completing my 3rd and 4th courses of the MET program. For this exercise I picked the bag that I carry around all day. To and from work, and while completing errands. This bag carries my necessities for work and leisure and represents my responsibilities, hobbies, and is a glimpse into who I am. 

Some items this bag includes are:

  • Cell phone
  • Laptop
  • Wallet
  • 2 sets of keys
  • A cosmetics/medical items bag with items such as a toothbrush, Tylenol, etc
  • Sunglasses
  • Dog treats
  • Nespresso coffee pods
  • Hand sanitizer and lip balm
  • Granola bar

These items speak to who I am as well as the activities I engage in. Dog treats (and my dog who wanted a treat) show I am a dog owner. This also represents my need for physical activity and being in the outdoors. I often find dog treats in different pockets and it reminds me of these times with her which I really enjoy. My key lanyards are both representative of different times in my life. One of the school I am currently teaching, and one of UBC, the school I currently attend. Additionally it connects to one of the areas I most dedicated myself to, basketball. This UBC athletics lanyard is a reminder of the time and energy I put into competing at the university level in basketball and these spark amazing memories of my time playing. I then was lucky enough to compete for team Canada junior teams and finally end my career playing professionally in Germany. Now my basketball days are behind me while I turn my focus to volunteering at the high school level, connecting me to not only my students but also my past.

My laptop is my connection to my responsibilities both at work and in school. I carry this around and find time to complete necessary work during down time. The Nespresso pods also indicate coffee is a necessity as both a student and teacher! As I am always on the go I need to ensure I have coffee travelling with me as well as a quick snack.

The text technologies in my bag are numerous. They include my iphone, laptop and ear buds (not pictured). These text technologies show that I interact more with digital texts and communication. I definitely listen to podcasts and audio books more than I would read or write text on paper. Those articles I do read for school are all transported through my laptop. There are more subtle examples of text technologies all throughout my wallet on the different cards and receipts. Although even much of the purchasing or commercial engagement I participate in is done through my cell phone or computer applications. For example, ordering my Nespresso pods is done through digital apps and communication.

15 years ago most people’s bags would have had less advanced technology such as laptops or cell phones. The ones they would have may have been larger and heavier or would be replaced with notebooks, pens/pencils, and erasers. My personal bag would be traded in for an athletic bag. My laptop would be replaced with basketball shoes and a water bottle and a notebook filled with goals and training plans. My social calendar would be replaced with tournaments, training sessions, and physiotherapy appointments. It is exciting to think about the changes over the last 15 years. What will my bag look like in the next 15 years? How will technology have changed?

I think the private contents of my bag are similar to the narrative I have of myself and the image I outwardly project. I am an organized, hardworking, and social person. I think my laptop, telephone, and receipts would portray this image accurately. However this picture is just a glimpse or snapshot into one’s life, there is of course more complexity to people than the items in their bag.

Activity 1.4 Defining Terms

What is text

Text is written words that communicate ideas and information

What is technology

Technology is any digital device that helps complete tasks such as communicating and computing.

OED Etymology

Text: “The wording of anything written or printed; the structure formed by the words in their order; the very words phrases, and sentences written.”

Technology: “The product of such application; technological knowledge or know-how; a technological process, method or technique. Also: machinery, equipment etc., developed from the practical application of scientific and technical knowledge.”

Texture: “The process of art weaving; obsolete.”

Textbook: “A book used as a standard work for the study of a particular subject” or “a book containing a selection of Scripture texts, arranged for daily use or easy reference.”

Technique: The formal or practical aspect of any art, occupation, or field; manner of execution or performance with regard to this. Also more generally: way of doing something.

Early in the graph during 1500 to 1700 the use of these terms fluctuate in usage. Text is used more often whereas there are many years where technology is not used at all. This continues up until about 1930 where text and technology begin to spike, reaching their peak around 1991. They then both show a decline. 

Can you identify historical events that might have influenced changes in the usage of these terms over time as evidenced in the Google Ngram search?

End of World War II 1945- often war sparks innovation which could point to the beginning of the climb in technology

Television invented 1927: Technology brought into the living rooms of many people

Internet invented 1973: This is where we see the term technology take over text. This would have been a huge innovation that sky rocketed technology usage

How is technology related to text?

I think technology is related to text in many ways. Text is the language used for communication while technology and devices are the tool. Technology allows people to create text, access text, and share text.

Some question that emerged from this activity are:

  1. Historically what caused the spikes in the use of the term technology during 1500-1550?
  2. Why did the use of technology and text drop after 2000, and what would the graph look like today. I tried to search until 2024 but the generator would not allow past 2019.

 

 

 

Tipping Point

Tipping Point Assignment: 

A Critical Case Study of the Shift from External Storage to Cloud Computing 

 A tipping point represents a moment when incremental changes lead to a significant and often irreversible shift. With the rapid growth of technology, changes occur often. The transition from external storage to the cloud represents a significant tipping point in technology. External storage devices, such as hard drives, USB flash drives, and external SSDs, have long been the primary means for individuals and organizations to store and manage their digital data. However, cloud computing and storage has greatly impacted this by offering valuable benefits over external storage.  

 What is cloud computing? “A widely used definition was issued by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), which defines cloud computing as “a model for enabling ubiquitous, convenient, on-demand network access to a shared pool of configurable computing resources (e.g., networks, servers, storage, applications, and services) that can be rapidly provisioned and released with minimal management effort or service provider interaction” (Wolfschwenger et al., 2020).   

 It is challenging to pinpoint an exact date when USB storage definitively “gave way” to the cloud, as both methods continue to coexist and serve different purposes for users. “USB portable hard drives emerged onto the consumer market in the early 2000s as an alternative form of data storage to 3.5-inch floppy disks and CD-ROMs” (Kennedy and Wilken, 2016, p. 2). Whereas cloud storage as a concept evolved over time. The modern idea of cloud storage, where data is stored and accessed over the internet, began to take shape in the late 1990s and early 2000s. Companies like Amazon, Google, and others started offering cloud storage services in the early 2000s (Aaron & Roche, 2011). This is when it became more widely adopted by businesses and individuals due to advancements in internet connectivity, storage technologies, and the proliferation of digital data. “Growing rapidly in recent years, the cloud has become a critical part of the digital infrastructure of many businesses” (Law, 2023). It did take time for users, specifically educators, to feel comfortable using cloud storage. However, it is now a worldwide, 57-billion-dollar industry (Law, 2023). 

One of the key figures in the development of cloud computing, which includes cloud storage, is Joseph Carl Robnett Licklider, known as J.C.R. Licklider. Licklider was an American psychologist and computer scientist who played a crucial role in the development of ARPANET, the precursor to the internet (Nemenyi, 2019). He envisioned a future in which computers would be interconnected and users could access programs and data from anywhere. His vision laid the foundation for cloud computing and cloud storage as we know them today. Nemenyi also writes that it was Licklider along with others who “would transform the digital computer from the solitary monolithic calculator that it had been from von Neumann’s invention into the graphical, interactive, windowed, mouse-driven, multi-purpose, hyperlinked and internetworked computer that we know today” (Nemenyi, 2019, p.12). While cloud storage has evolved as a collaborative effort among many individuals and organizations, there isn’t a single individual who is most associated with creating cloud storage. Instead, it has been a collective effort driven by the technological advancements and innovations of the broader tech industry. 

 External storage lost ground to cloud computing in education technology because of the many benefits it provides students and educators. Cloud computing platforms, such as Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud Platform (GCP), provide users with virtualized storage resources that can be accessed from anywhere with an internet connection. This shift to cloud-based storage provides benefits such as accessibility and convenience, allowing users to access their data from anywhere with reliable internet, and increases ease of collaboration and sharing. 

 The shift from using external to online storage in education can be largely attributed to the Internet’s transformative impact on how we access, store, and share information. As the internet has grown, teachers have had to evolve and change to meet the demands of a digitally connected world. They have had to adapt their teaching methods to incorporate digital tools and resources, such as online learning platforms, educational apps, and multimedia content, to enhance student engagement and learning outcomes. Additionally, teachers have had to develop new skills and competencies, such as digital literacy and the ability to evaluate online information, to effectively navigate the vast amount of information available on the internet. The internet is a powerful platform that has changed how people interact with each other and access information. As educators have embraced the internet, they have specifically had to explore ways to store files, synchronize files, create new documents, and collaborate. This has all been possible because of cloud computing. The main causes and catalysts of the transition from traditional external storage solutions to cloud computing can be attributed to its many benefits in regard to sustainability, attention, global health, and digital labour.  

 The shift from costly and disposable USB portable hard drives to cloud-based storage reflects a growing emphasis on sustainability in technology usage. “As our participants attest, since USB portable hard drives came onto the market, they have transitioned from being costly luxury items to becoming disposable, throwaway items” (Kennedy and Wilken, 2016, p. 4). However, it should be noted there are still environmental concerns when it comes to cloud computing. “Far from saving energy, our AI-enabled workplace future uses more energy than ever before, a challenge the tech industry rapidly needs to assess and consider in the years ahead” (Mills, 2020).  Sustainability involves not just environmental considerations, but also the responsible use of resources. “IT staff of organizations using public, or community cloud services face reduced maintenance and installation costs and efforts” (Wolfschwenger et al., 2020). This cost efficiency is important for educational institutions when deciding on resources. Finally, cloud scalability allows for large amounts of data. It does not rely on limited gigabytes but can sustain large data growth making it suitable for educational institutions, educators, and students. 

 Today people’s attention is pulled in so many directions that where they choose to allocate their time is valuable. As Citton (2017) discusses, the attention economy is one where the most valuable resource is attention, and businesses, platforms, and people need to compete for this resource. By streamlining access to data, reducing time spent searching for files, and enabling efficient collaboration, cloud computing as a storage solution aligns with the principles of the attention economy. It increases speed, holds attention and has therefore gained popularity. The desire for this flexible and collaborative storage option is now preferred by both students and teachers. However, it should be noted that value is based on perception, and something is valuable when someone deems it so. For example, the value of the USB is low until sentimental value (photos or data) is stored on them (Kennedy and Wilken, 2016). Both the external storage as well as the cloud are invaluable if no one gives them attention or utilizes them. Due to the educational landscape where youth and educators effectively multitask and desire efficiency, attention is being given to cloud storage and services overtaking external storage.  

 The cloud also allows for more collaboration between educators and students, reducing the amount of digital labour by streamlining tasks and enhancing productivity. “Many of today’s applications are web-based and accessible via the Internet so that educators and learners can use them without the need to install a specific program or go to a specific place” (Wolfschwenger et al., 2020). Educators instead choose the ability to store files remotely, in online cloud storage services making it easier to work on documents and resources both in and out of the classroom, ultimately reducing digital labour. 

Cloud computing enables file synchronization, which ensures that the most up-to-date version of a file is available across all devices. This is particularly useful for educators who work on multiple devices or collaborate with others, as it helps to prevent version control issues. Cloud-based productivity tools, such as Microsoft 365, allow multiple users to work on the same document simultaneously, making it easier for educators to collaborate with colleagues and students. By utilizing these cloud technologies effectively, educators and students can optimize their work and enhance productivity, while minimizing the administrative labour associated with digital tools and resources. 

 Furthermore, the global health crisis, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, has underscored the significance of cloud computing and escalated this tipping point. Ensuring continuous access to online education and bridging the digital divide by providing equitable access to technology and resources, particularly for communities with limited IT infrastructure was essential and would not have been as effective through external storage devices. Communication of data between health care professionals, vaccine development, and disseminating educational resources to citizens would have been more laborious and inefficient. 

 However, there may be instances where “computing in a distributed cloud computing environment is subject to latencies when/where Internet connectivity is unreliable” (James & Weber, 2016, p. 110). This means if there is an outage, or users live in remote areas work can be interrupted, resulting in exclusion of some users. External storage offers physical control over data, portability, and offline access. This could contribute to a healthier society by utilizing external storage to distribute educational tools to those areas which are remote or inaccessible. Although external storage is not as collaborative, “security is always a concern, and some people feel their data and software are less safe and private in the cloud. One loses physical control over hardware in the cloud, leading to a sense of vulnerability to hackers” (James & Weber, 2016, p. 113). This would be especially true regarding health care and data in education however Covid was a great example where the dire circumstances and many benefits of the cloud outweighed these worries.

Cloud computing and storage has brought about significant changes in pedagogy by enabling new teaching and learning methods which enhance collaboration and communication, promoting personalized learning experiences, and providing access to a wealth of digital resources. “Education programs promoting the development of digital literacy are emerging all around the world and are being integrated into the curriculums on all educational levels, especially K-12” (Wolfschwenger et al., 2020).  

 As the digital part in teaching and learning grows, so does the need for reliable, cost-efficient and flexible tools. “Cloud computing platforms offer an outstanding opportunity to support and streamline the accessibility of such tools computing as a commodity and can be very helpful for the implementation of modern teaching and learning models that rely on the integration of digital media” (Wolfschwenger et al., 2020).  The educational landscape and needs of its users to synchronize, create, collaborate, and work efficiently explain why we have seen a tipping point where external storage has given way to cloud computing technology. 

 

Sources 

Aaron, L. S., & Roche, C. M. (2011). Teaching, Learning, and Collaborating in the Cloud: Applications of Cloud Computing for Educators in Post-Secondary Institutions. Journal of Educational Technology Systems40(2), 95- 111. https://doi.org/10.2190/ET.40.2.b 

Citton, Y. (2017). Introduction and conclusion: From attention economy to attention ecology. In Y. Citton, The ecology of attention. John Wiley & Sons. 

James, C. N., & Weber, J. (2016). Chapter 7—Cloud Computing in Education. In T. C. Vance, N. Merati, C. Yang, & M. Yuan (Eds.), Cloud Computing in Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences (pp. 107–119). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803192-6.00007-4 

Kennedy, J., & Wilken, R. (2016). Disposable technologies: The halfwayness of USB portable hard drives. Wi: Journal of Mobile Media10(1). 

Law, M. (2023, February 15). Top 10 biggest cloud providers in the world in 2023. https://technologymagazine.com/top10/top-10-biggest-cloud-providers-in-the-world-in-2023 

Mills, M. (2020, April 25). Our love of the cloud is making a green energy future impossible. TechCrunch. https://techcrunch.com/2020/04/25/our-love-of-the-cloud-is-making-a-green-energy-future-impossible/ 

Nemenyi, D. (2019). What is an internet? Norbert Wiener and the society of control (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.etho… 

Wolfschwenger, P., Albaner, B., Kastner-Hauler, O., & Sabitzer, B. (2020). The Value of Cloud-Based Learning Environments for Digital Education. 2020 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE44824.2020.9274223 

 

 

 

IP 5 Global Health

IP 5: Global Health  

Global health creates a new starting point for the growth and future of educational technology. This is because global health shapes the way educational technology is developed and used, and vice versa. Technology provides educational resources across borders and geographical boundaries to those with the required technology. These tools include a vast array of information including public health data, sexual education, nutrition, research, and health care professional training. Ultimately, improving global health by providing essential information and education. Conversely, global health frequently shapes the creation of educational tools as they are often designed in response to a specific need. An example of this is the digital tool created by the University of Michigan students, aimed at educating people on different aspects of Malaria to help eradicate the disease (Magdalena, 2023). Additionally, we saw many examples of digital tools being created out of necessity during the COVID-19 pandemic. For instance, education apps such as Seesaw and Kahoot, the COVID mobile App allowing people to track their symptoms and find updated information, and Telehealth and digital doctors became common place. 

COVID-19 accelerated the integration of technology prompting educators to adapt to the changing circumstances and meet the evolving needs of learners. Educational technology has been instrumental in enabling remote learning, facilitating collaboration among students and educators, and providing access to educational resources amidst the disruptions caused by the pandemic. This global health event impacted education greatly, taught us valuable lessons, and proved there is still much to be learned.  

First, it emphasized that without health everything in life becomes secondary, urging a shift to a more holistic approach to learning where value is placed on not only academic outcomes, but physical, mental, and emotional well-being. Bennette’s (2020) article criticizes educators during the pandemic. I do agree with Bennette that there were areas that could be improved such as having more robust technology infrastructure (Bennette, 2020). However, the pandemic showed many educators are creative, resilient, and adaptable. Bennette overlooks the fact that teachers are notoriously overworked and provided limited resources. Not to mention, they themselves were navigating a global health crisis impacting their own safety and their families. I hope one lesson learned worldwide was that global health can be greatly supported and driven through educators. This accentuates the importance of valuing teachers and providing essential resources to ensure our future leaders and innovators are being supported.  

The pandemic also highlighted the importance of building adaptive and resilient education systems, educators, and students. This could be supported by teaching students in a variety of learning environments, implementing both group and individual work, and embracing innovation and technology. Access to technology plays a crucial role in providing accessible education globally. This is particularly significant for those regions with limited access to traditional education. However, as mentioned in the article “Technology can transform global health and education, but it’s no silver bullet,” by the University of Oxford (2019); technology implemented incorrectly will be ineffective and costly. However, “when technology is deployed thoughtfully and judicially, positive disruption on a large scale is entirely possible” (University of Oxford, 2019). This underscores the importance of integrating technology effectively to enhance global health outcomes. 

Amidst the pandemic, inequalities became even more evident as individuals with lower socioeconomic status found themselves further marginalized, experiencing unequal access to not only health care and vaccinations, but crucial student learning support. As Burgess and Sievertsen note, “there will likely be substantial disparities between families in the extent to which they can help their children learn” (Burgess & Sievertsen, 2020). These disparities are influenced by factors including parents’ work schedule, capacity to afford tutors, parental education, and access to technology. 

Communities who face greater challenges in accessing online learning resources were particularly disadvantaged. Addressing the digital divide and ensuring equitable access to technology and internet connectivity are critical for inclusive education and global health. “While digital technology undoubtedly enables communication, collaboration and online education, a more permanent shift to remote learning could exacerbate inequalities if adequate digital tools and technological options are not affordable or easily accessible” (COVIDEA, 2024). This is a lesson that governments and education policies need to address and prepare for in case of another global pandemic. 

Another important lesson acquired post pandemic is the re-evaluation of the metrics used to evaluate a ‘good’ student to include diverse learners. As Boys (2021) highlights, teachers search for evidence of an engaged student such as body language and participation. However, the pandemic has shown us engagement and learning can look different for individual students. When the removal of face-to-face learning occurred, everyone thought it was the demise of education. “This is despite the fact that for the majority of on-campus students, most of their study is already not done face-to-face” (Boys, 2021, pg 15). This shift requires a willingness to adapt traditional evaluation methods to better accommodate the needs and preferences of individual learners, ultimately fostering a more equitable and healthy learning environment for all. 

In conclusion, the relationships among education, technology, and global health are multifaceted and interconnected. The COVID-19 pandemic emphasized the significance of leveraging educational technology to address global health challenges and adapt to changing educational landscapes. “The pandemic’s disruptions have had significant implications for student learning, with estimates suggesting that students may have begun fall 2020 with only approximately 70% of the learning gains in reading compared to a typical school year” (Kuhfeld et el., 2020). Moving forward, it is essential for education systems to learn from this life altering experience to build more resilient, inclusive, and innovative educational environments. By doing so, we can better prepare ourselves to meet the challenges of the future while ensuring equitable access to education and health for all. 

Works Cited 

Bennette, P. W. (2020, July 20). The educational experience has been substandard for students during COVID-19Links to an external site.. Policy Options. 

 Boys, J. (2021). Exploring inequalities in the social, spatial and material practices of teaching and learning in pandemic timesPostdigital Science and Education, 4(1), 13-32.  

 Burgess, S., & Sievertsen, H. H. (2020, April 1). Schools, skills, and learning: The impact of COVID-19 on educationLinks to an external site.. Vox. 

 COVIDEA (COVID Education Alliance) – foggs.org. (n.d.). Retrieved February 12, 2024, from https://www.foggs.org/covidea/ 

 Kuhfeld, M., Soland, J., Tarasawa, B., Johnson, A., Ruzek, E., & Lewis, K. (2020, December 3). How is COVID-19 affecting student learning? Question 2Links to an external site.. Brown Center Chalkboard, Brookings. 

 Magdaleno, R. (n.d.). Students develop digital tool to help the fight against malaria | Pursuit | University of Michigan School of Public Health | Malaria | Infectious Disease | Epidemiology | Student | BS | BA | Epidemiology | Undergraduate. Retrieved February 11, 2024, from https://sph.umich.edu/pursuit/2023posts/students-develop-digital-tool-to-help-the-fight-against-malaria.html 

 Technology can transform global health and education, but it’s no silver bullet | University of Oxford. (2019, May 29). https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2019-05-29-technology-can-transform-global-health-and-education-its-no-silver-bullet 

 

IP 3 Algorithms

IP: 3 Algorithms 

“At a time when state funding for public goods such as universities, schools, libraries, archives, and other important memory institutions is in decline in the US, private corporations are providing products, services and financing on their behalf. With these trade-offs comes an exercising of greater control over the information, which is deeply consequential for those already systematically oppressed…” (Noble, p. 123) 

 Explain in your own words what “content prioritization” (Noble, p. 156) means (give some examples) and how (in lay terms) content prioritization algorithms work.  

Content prioritization is giving preference, highlighting, or showing certain types of digital content before others. These prioritization algorithms follow rules and organized patterns that determine what you see. These patterns are based off relevance to you, your previous searches and online behaviour, and what is currently popular. For example, if you often search articles about sports, open news about sports, like posts about sports, the algorithm will learn this behaviour and then prioritize sports-related content for you. Another example is Tik Tok. Depending on how long you spend watching a video, Tik Tok will determine your interest level in the post and continue to prioritize similar posts. Other examples can be seen on your social media feeds, your news apps, even my Gmail prioritizes certain mail and files what is considered lowest priority into my junk mail. Many of these algorithms can seem positive by increasing efficiency and steering you towards areas of interest, however they also result in people seeing more of the same, causing ‘filter bubbles’. Merriam webster defines these as “an online environment in which people are exposed only to opinions and information that conform to their existing beliefs (Definition of FILTER BUBBLE, 2023). This has many consequences for the user and others in society, particularly those often marginalized. 

With control over the “largest digital repository in the world” (Noble, p. 157), how have Google’s content prioritization algorithms been “consequential for those already systematically oppressed”? How do they impact your professional life? (give specific examples and briefly discuss) 

Noble highlights Google as an example of a private institution that has massive control since declining state memory institutions. If a corporation, such as Google prioritizes specific content, it goes against the principles of net neutrality. In a net-neutral environment, content should not be chosen based off of what it is or who is viewing it. Without this neutrality, there is no longer an even playing field for all content and viewers. Instead, there is the opportunity for discrimination and bias. 

For example, “Google focused on its prioritization of high-paying advertisers that were competing against small businesses and entities that do not index pages on the basis of the pay-per-click advertising model” (Noble, 2018, pg 158). Small companies that are already facing obstacles are therefore further disadvantaged. Prioritization algorithms are also based on previous data. Therefore, if historical data includes stereotypes or bias towards certain people, then this could be perpetuated. For example, if you were to search ‘doctor’ or ‘engineer’ and saw only pictures of males you may be influenced to believe that they are male dominated professions. If you were seeking to learn about a certain culture, your online searches may only yield stereotypical pictures and information furthering an inaccurate representation. 

These algorithms impact my professional life as a teacher in many ways. They can make it harder to find resources that are diverse. This is especially hard as a Social Studies teacher, trying to stay up to date with current events. Algorithms make it much more difficult to ensure I am getting an unbiased understanding of what is happening across the world. Additionally, these algorithms impact curriculum and lesson planning. Administration and I must implement this learning into curriculum, so students understand what they see online is not the whole picture teaching skills such as triangulation and fact checking to combat their ‘filter bubbles’ and misinformation. 

PageRank is essentially a popularity contest for websites. It looks at how many other websites link to a particular site and considers those links as votes. The more and higher quality votes a site gets, the more important Google thinks it is, and it shows up higher in search results. This impacts my personal life in many ways. I rely on research and information to form many decisions in my life. For example, my finances. I search for information online about investing, saving, mortgages etc. So, PageRank would show me certain content perhaps because large corporations have paid to have the highest rank to seem the most reputable. This ranking system can be seen very clearly in social media, something I use daily. If a post on Instagram or TikTok gets a high number of likes, it will get higher visibility on my feed. However, just because something is popular does not make it accurate or credible. Certain posts act as click bait and contain misleading information. Also, popular and wealthy people such as celebrities or content creators continue to get more popular instead of providing equal opportunity to those with less of a platform but valuable things/ideas to share. Therefore, I can impact PageRank by being conscious about what I click on and share and ‘liking’ diverse posts. 

 Definition of FILTER BUBBLE. (2023, December 7). https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/filter+bubble 

Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York University Press. https://doi.org/10.18574/9781479833641