The Coat.

‘The Trenchcoat’ by Norman Manae, a part of the collection “Compulsory Happiness,”  is set in Bucharest during the stirring history of the haunting truths of Romania’s last years under communist rule. At first, I thought the novel was one of the most peculiar, vague pieces of literature I had ever read. I do not think that that opinion might have changed after listening to the lecture, but a lot of things in the novel now make sense. Through the lens of an unassuming, mysterious item—a raincoat, trench coat, or overcoat—the story unfolds in a landscape marked by monotony, surveillance, and the nuanced struggle for identity and autonomy against the backdrop of a dictatorial regime. Manea’s work, especially the complex, interactive interplay of power, boredom, and the presence of the state’s watchful eyes, offers a compelling exploration of life under a repressive government, where even the most mundane objects become symbols of resistance, conformity, or despair.

The novella follows two couples en route to a dinner hosted by another more formal and wealthy couple, their anticipation is tinged more with anxiety and disinterest than excitement, despite the privileges and luxury awaiting them. The scene later cuts to the next day, when an unexpected appearance of a trenchcoat at the guests’ house plungs the story into a maze that culminates in surprising and shocking discoveries. Thus, in the narrative, the trenchcoat transcends its ordinary role. While typically a commonplace item, within the novel, it becomes a beacon of mystery and intrigue.

To be honest, the novel left me hanging. I spent a lot of time on this piece of literature, and I feel like I just ran through the novel because of how confused it left me. However, I do want to talk about what the raincoat means to me. Much like raincoats, which serve the purpose of protection against the rain, kind of like a cover to protect oneself. The raincoat in this novel unfolds symbolically, a myriad of mysteries in the context of Dina and Brazil’s lives. One of which might be that their wealth and status afford them a protective layer, much like the raincoat, against the systemic oppressions and scarcity that plague their country. However, the symbolism of the raincoat in relation to Dina and Brazil extends far beyond a mere shield from physical elements; it represents the nuanced ways in which the elite navigate the treacherous waters of political and social conformity to maintain their position and safety. For example, Comrade Vasile uses his house as a means to hold certain kinds of confidential meetings.

Nonetheless, it is genuinely astonishing how the author expertly navigated the limits of censorship to offer a vivid portrait of life under a dictatorial regime, emphasizing the intricacies of state surveillance. Initially, the unusual writing style appeared to me as strange, but it perfectly depicts the complexity and subtleties of an oppressive system.

Question: What is the significance behind the nameless character, the Learned One, The Kid, etc., being shrouded in such mystery, and how does this contribute to the narrative, especially considering his eventual connection with Lady Di?

Who am I?

Hello everyone! I am Katyayani from a town called Dehradun in India. I am in 2nd year (Arts) planning to major in Political Science or Psychology (or both). I am hoping to get a graduate degree in Law but that’s too far to think about. Some of my hobbies include painting, cooking, photography, horse riding and basketball. I have been playing basketball ever since I was 6 and am a national level basketball player. Right now, I live with my parents who decided to shift to Vancouver which I now call my ‘new home’.

I have always been intrigued by literature because I had to study a lot of Shakespeare in high school but had never really been into reading books because it always felt like a huge commitment, until I was forced to. Joining UBC, especially the CAP  program has made me like reading a lot (also because I got used to it).

My expectations for this course is to fall in love with reading or, to be realistic, at least like it. Before the first class, I’d always thought that this course would quite literally be about the world of romance and I would get to read and interpret about ‘love’. What I found surprising was that the word romance itself is derived from the official language of the Roman empire, thus this course explores a lot other than just romance. From the introduction lectures, I learnt that we will be looking into various novels from the 20th and 21th century written by the most influential authors in the world which I am looking forward to. We will also be seeking commonalities and differences between texts written in various languages from around the world, especially Eastern Europe translated into English. 

What I really caught hold about the first lecture is that Romance Studies has no territories, unlike other official languages of the world. It is a common linguistic heritage of novels, just an offspring of Latin. It does not belong to a specific geographical region therefore fits into or finds a place anywhere and everywhere. There is no right answer in this course giving us an opportunity to explore our thinking and find meaning in accordance to what fits us well. I am excited to dive deep into literature and challenge myself to explore various different themes. I hope to spend a great semester with everyone in this class. Welcome and good luck!

Spam prevention powered by Akismet