{"id":124,"date":"2009-01-12T11:30:49","date_gmt":"2009-01-12T19:30:49","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/valencia-m.livejournal.com\/813.html"},"modified":"2009-01-12T20:04:19","modified_gmt":"2009-01-13T04:04:19","slug":"what-is-culture-3","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/last201\/2009\/01\/12\/what-is-culture-3\/","title":{"rendered":"What is culture?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Out of the two articles assigned for this week, I found Keesing&#8217;s assessment of the term &#8220;culture&#8221; much more compelling than Williams&#8217; article.\u00a0 However, I think this is largely a result of the historical context of each article.\u00a0 I&#8217;m a little confused about the date of publication of the first article, but I <span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">think<\/span> it was written in the late 1950&#8217;s to early 1960&#8217;s.\u00a0 This would explain the author&#8217;s fixation with Marxism and his constant juxtaposition of working-class culture with elite culture in England.\u00a0 When this article is viewed in a historical context, I find Williams&#8217; criticism of &#8220;culture&#8221; fairly compelling, yet there seem to be some elements of hypocrisy.\u00a0 Primarily in the author&#8217;s initial description of the &#8220;teashop&#8221; and its association with an elevated &#8220;cultivated people.&#8221;\u00a0 Here, Williams is describing a frustration with the use of the term &#8220;culture&#8221; in parallel to the term &#8220;cultivated&#8221; and therefore &#8220;educated&#8221; (translation: elite).\u00a0\u00a0 After explaining his rejection of the term &#8220;culture&#8221; in this context, he goes on to describe a vision of English culture to which everyone contributes and where cultural meanings are negotiated.\u00a0 However, the author also refers to a new and &#8220;cheapened&#8221; version of culture which he links to advertising in mass media.\u00a0 This type of culture the author proposes to replace with a better, more developed culture of\u00a0 the future.\u00a0 I\u00a0find that Williams&#8217; allegations that popular culture as represented by the mass media is a low and cheapened culture to be akin to the elitism of the teashop use of &#8220;culture.&#8221;\u00a0 It seems to me that the author holds some nostalgia for his former days as a boy in rural England and the type of &#8220;culture&#8221; he saw in this setting and this is (in some fashion) is what he would like to impose upon the &#8220;new&#8221; developing culture of the time.<\/p>\n<p>In reference to Keesing&#8217;s article, I agree for the most part that anthropology has been centered around a quest for the &#8220;Other&#8221; and an emphasis on difference.\u00a0 Honestly, I don&#8217;t have much to say other than that!\u00a0 I&#8217;ve read a lot of similiar articles in Latin American Studies concerning anthropology and the exoticizing of non-western cultures so I suppose that this article doesn&#8217;t propose much that is new information for me.<br \/>\nSorry I\u00a0don&#8217;t have more to contribute!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Out of the two articles assigned for this week, I found Keesing&#8217;s assessment of the term &quot;culture&quot; much more compelling than Williams&#8217; article.&nbsp; However, I think this is largely a result of the historical context of each article.&nbsp; I&#8217;m a little confused about the date of publication of the first article, but I <u>think<\/u> it was written in the late 1950&#8217;s to early 1960&#8217;s.&nbsp; This would explain the author&#8217;s fixation with Marxism and his constant juxtaposition of working-class culture with elite culture in England.&nbsp; When this article is viewed in a historical context, I find Williams&#8217; criticism of &quot;culture&quot; fairly compelling, yet there seem to be some elements of hypocrisy.&nbsp; Primarily in the author&#8217;s initial description of the &quot;teashop&quot; and its association with an elevated &quot;cultivated people.&quot;&nbsp; Here, Williams is describing a frustration with the use of the term &quot;culture&quot; in parallel to the term &quot;cultivated&quot; and therefore &quot;educated&quot; (translation: elite).&nbsp;&nbsp; After explaining his rejection of the term &quot;culture&quot; in this context, he goes on to describe a vision of English culture to which everyone contributes and where cultural meanings are negotiated.&nbsp; However, the author also refers to a new and &quot;cheapened&quot; version of culture which he links to advertising in mass media.&nbsp; This type of culture the author proposes to replace with a better, more developed culture of&nbsp; the future.&nbsp; I&nbsp;find that Williams&#8217; allegations that popular culture as represented by the mass media is a low and cheapened culture to be akin to the elitism of the teashop use of &quot;culture.&quot;&nbsp; It seems to me that the author holds some nostalgia for his former days as a boy in rural England and the type of &quot;culture&quot; he saw in this setting and this is (in some fashion) is what he would like to impose upon the &quot;new&quot; developing culture of the time. &nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>In reference to Keesing&#8217;s article, I agree for the most part that anthropology has been centered around a quest for the &quot;Other&quot; and an emphasis on difference.&nbsp; Honestly, I don&#8217;t have much to say other than that!&nbsp; I&#8217;ve read a lot of similiar articles in Latin American Studies concerning anthropology and the exoticizing of non-western cultures so I suppose that this article doesn&#8217;t propose much that is new information for me.&nbsp; <br \/>Sorry I&nbsp;don&#8217;t have more to contribute!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":303,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[333,1997],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-124","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-responses","category-williams-and-keesing"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/last201\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/124","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/last201\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/last201\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/last201\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/303"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/last201\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=124"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/last201\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/124\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":131,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/last201\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/124\/revisions\/131"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/last201\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=124"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/last201\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=124"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/last201\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=124"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}