REPORT PROPOSAL
To: Dr. Erika Paterson, Professor
From: Leif Jack, Student
Date: June 22, 2022
Subject: Proposal for Comparing the Feasibility of Heightening Kelowna’s Mission Creek Dikes versus Installing Water Pumps
Audience Description
The formal report would be intended for Kelowna City Council
Introduction
Due to climate change, Kelowna’s precipitation increasingly deviates from monthly averages, with some months receiving much less than average, and others much more. Moreover, summer months are seeing higher than average temperatures more frequently. June-August 2021 for example saw record-breaking heat, and unexpected dryness, while contrastingly, this June’s rainfall and melting snow pushed a large local creek, Mission Creek, approximately within a metre of overflowing.
Statement of Problem
Unexpected, dangerously hot and dry temperatures, and Mission Creek potentially overflowing creates two dangers respectively: water scarcity, and damage to private properties. Water scarcity reduces living standards, threatens sufficient irrigation of wineries and other agriculture, and inhibits the city’s population expansion. These effects reduce the city’s desirability for prospective residents and businesses, diminish economic prosperity, and limit growing the city’s revenue, which could be used to create and upgrade infrastructure or amenities.
Meanwhile, Mission Creek flooding could potentially over-irrigate nearby farms, and flood nearby homes, while putting those who walk by the creek at higher risk of falling in and drowning from the fast, deep current. While walkways serving as dikes line most parts of the creek in city limits, and marshes attached to the creek lower its water level, these measures seem insufficient for mitigating a worst-case overflow scenario. Additionally, these measures do not take advantage of the creek as a water source when it is abnormally high, which is a shame considering Kelowna summers are frequently becoming hotter and dryer.
Proposed Solution
To determine the measures available for managing a high creek water level and droughts, I would compare the feasibility of heightening Mission Creek’s dikes with installing a series of water pumps. Heightening the dykes could prove an inexpensive solution, as it would only require dirt, gravel, trucks, and a construction crew to effectively spread and pack the dirt and gravel, while allowing for the creek to reach higher levels without causing flooding or endangering those who use the walkways. For further security, the dikes could be reinforced with concrete.
Contrastingly, installing one or more water pumping stations along the creek could be more expensive, but would allow using the creek as a water source, helping mitigate droughts while reducing the water level. The water pump could either only activate when the creek is exceedingly high, thus utilizing its excess water, or used more frequently on the advice of water conservation experts.
Scope and Methods
To compare the feasibility of these two solutions, I will answer the following:
- Is drought or the creek flooding more likely, and how soon could either happen?
- Which event concerns citizens more?
- How expensive is each solution, including maintenance costs?
- Would the solution bring the desired outcome?
- Would citizens approve of either of these solutions?
To answer these questions, I would research the likeliness of drought and flooding, the solutions’ costs, and effectiveness, while gathering citizens opinions through an online survey. The results of my research and survey would then be discussed in a formal comparative report, which would conclude with recommending the optimal solution based on my research and survey data.
Qualifications
I am a resident of Kelowna, however, my home is far enough away from Mission Creek that it is extremely unlikely to suffer damage from the river overflowing. This puts me in the right position to be engaged but still objective, as I am a member of the community, but not under immediate threat or pressure.
Conclusion
Drought and flooding exacerbated by climate change are concerning issues for Kelowna, but there are potential solutions to these problems whose urgency, cost-effectiveness, and popularity need to be researched. The water pump solution especially, if properly implemented, could maintain Kelowna’s current living standards and economic activity concerning wineries and agriculture, despite increasing frequency of droughts in the area due to climate change. With approval, research into these solutions’ feasibility could begin immediately.
——————————————————————————-
Progress Report
To: Erika Paterson, Professor
From: Leif Jack, Student
Date: June 22nd, 2022
Subject: Proposal for Comparing the Feasibility of Heightening Kelowna’s Mission Creek Dikes versus Installing Water Pumps
Hello Dr. Paterson,
This memo details progress on my formal report, and elaborates on its general details, research plan, and writing schedule:
GENERAL DETAILS
- Audience: The report’s final draft is addressed to Colin Basran, Kelowna’s current mayor. Basran also serves on the Board of Directors of the Regional District of Central Okanagan
- Purpose: Compare the feasibility of heightening Mission Creek’s walkways with installing water pumps along the creek, as ways to prevent flooding when Mission Creek has a high water level.
- Significance: In recent Kelowna has experienced high variations in rainfall and temperature, with some months much dryer than average and other wetter, putting the city at increased droughts and flood risk.
RESEARCH PLAN
- Research Kelowna’s average rainfall and temperature projections from academic articles or government agencies
- Investigate urban planning principles behind where and when dikes and water pumps are needed
- Research price range for installing and maintaining water pumps from other cities’ financial reports and commercial websites
- Survey Kelowna resident’s to determine proposed solutions’ popularity and perceived urgency
WRITING SCHEDULE
- July 12th: Latest Date to start work on Formal Report Draft
- July 12th-22nd (11 days): Conduct research, survey Kelowna residents, and complete as much of report as possible.
- July 22nd: Formal Report Draft Due
- July 27th: Peer Review of Report received
- July 23rd-Aug 2nd (11 days): Complete research and the report. Upon receiving peer review, spend the 28th-29th editing according to peer comments, and then the 30th to August 2nd finishing the report.
- Aug 2nd: Final Draft of Formal Report Due
Lastly, attached below is a link to the survey I plan to use in my research.
Please let me know if there are any issues accessing the survey questions or missing details. I look forward to hearing from you.
Encl.
SURVEY