Before we know it, there are only 3 weeks left until the end of the term! At this time, our group is shifting our focus from the canning manual to our final paper.

As mentioned in the last blog, our group had originally planned to conduct the phone call interviews at the Food Bank last Wednesday, Nov. 6th. However, since only two of the interviewees confirmed by Wednesday morning that they would be free to do the interview in the afternoon, we finally decided to stay on campus to conduct our interviews through Skype call.  Later, two more participants confirmed that they were available for the interviews. As the interviewees are from not only Vancouver, but also further regions such as Vernon and as far as Toronto, Jasmine created a Skype account specially for our interview and kindly paid for it in advance.

After revising the interview questions with our community partner, we decided to ask 2 questions regarding the usability of the FAQ section which we added to the canning manual (part I), and 2 other questions related to our research question (part II). As the participants of our interviews include both canning trainers and environmental health officers (EHO), we made two different versions of the questions for part I:

 For canning trainers:
1.    After reading through the FAQ, would you be able to answer these questions yourself if they were asked by your canning students?
2.    Were there any FAQs that you did not understand?  If yes, how could it be made more clear?

For EHOs:
1.    Is the information provided in the FAQs accurate?
2.    How could the information in the FAQs be made more clear?  (if they ask for this question to be explained, ask if these answers would be understandable to the general public or ask what grade level they see this info as geared towards?)

 For part II:
3.    In your opinion, do you think educating people on home preservation contributes to a person’s food literacy?
4.    In your opinion, how does educating people on home preservation improve a person’s food security?  Does it improve their health?

We had originally planned to interview 4 of the participants on Wednesday afternoon. The first interview with a EHO went well and he provided us a lot of valuable advice on how to improve the FAQs, as well as his opinions on the questions related to our research project. Unfortunately, we could not reach the second interviewee at the scheduled time, and the last two interviewees had not finished going over the manual and we had to reschedule the calls to other dates with them. In the end, after spending more than 3 hours meeting together to conduct the interviews, we were only able to interview one person successfully. Nevertheless, in between the scheduled calls, our group managed the time wisely to discuss different aspects of the project, including dividing up the remaining  interviews between the members, clearly defining designated parts of the final report and reconfirming our internal deadlines.

We were able to conduct five more interviews during the week. However, there are still some participants who were not available last week, thus we will need to continue, and hopefully finish, the remaining interviews by the end of this week. Fortunately, from the interviewed participants, we were able to gain many helpful suggestions about the FAQs of the canning manual. Most of them state that some terms used in the FAQs may still be too professional for the general audience to understand, and some of the answers may be excessively detailed – more than the general public will be interested to know. Therefore we have immediately started revising our FAQs accordingly. Participants also gave valuable opinions on our research question which, as mentioned in the previous blog post,  relates food preservation methods with food literacy and food security.

Much to our surprise, there were also many unexpected changes to the interviewing schedules. We originally expected that all interviews would have been completed last week,  thus currently we seem slightly behind our proposed schedule.  Nevertheless, in the mean time all members have begun working on their designated parts of the final paper. We will also continue the literature review on our research question and investigate how past studies may relate to the data collected from the interviews.  By the end of this week, our group expects that all interviews will be completed and that a draft paper will be formulated so that we could prepare for the plenary presentation next Wednesday.

Thanks for reading our updates! See you again next week!