Adweek recently discussed a new Demi Moore ad. In the ad, Moore – ordinarily rather gaunt at the age of 49 – doesn’t look an age over the prim and full cheeks of late 20’s. So much so, she’s been cited as “a Madame Tussauds” wax figure (Hollywood Reporter).
Not an age over waxy perfect, and bearing an eerie resemblance to Sarah Jessica Parker (who, like many stars, presumably also enjoys two hours of Photoshop before any outing), Moore has been photographed and altered to the point where she is practically unrecognizable.
Once again, we are thrown into the gray area of advertising, where the products are overshadowed by their lavish and not entirely honest campaigns. While there is absolutely nothing inherently wrong with colouring a figure in this manner, it does beg the question – what are we buying into?
It sells something much more than a product, than a benefit; it taps into something deeper in the human psyche, and plants images of glamour and flare. It’s beautiful, certainly, and effective, often, but at the end of the day, it promotes illusions to push a want on consumers. There are all sorts of ways for this to backfire as well, such as in cases like these, where everything just seems too perfect, and publicity turns on both the celebrity and the product. Reception for this advertising campaign in the press has purportedly been mostly negative.
Put this in conjunction with the Dove Evolution ad seen in class, and we find a rather disturbing, and oddly disparaging view of where apparel advertising has gone.



