Categories
Business News

Money for Nothing: The irony in corporate boards

Apart from being quite amusing, this interview with the satirical co-author John Gillespie of “Money for Nothing: How the Failure of Corporate Boards is Ruining American Business and Costing Us Trillions” opened my eyes to a major problem in business and the irony that huge, successful companies are still using the inefficient, controversial, and often un-businesslike corporate model which includes advisory boards.money_for_nothing.03

Also referred to as a “board of directors”, the corporate board is an assembly of elected or appointed individuals who oversee the activities of a specific company or organization. In for-profit companies, this board is responsible to the stakeholders, reviewing the broad policies of the company in order to ensure that it operates in the stakeholders’ best interest. The board is also responsible for appointing a chief executive (CEO) whom they believe will best run the company and adhere to its guiding principles.

In their book, John Gillespie and David Zweig slam the corporate board, portraying it as a farce. The fact that boards often include irresponsible individuals with no background in business displays an odd inconsistency in companies that built their fortunes and status on efficiency, commitment and hard-work. Organizational structures are in place to clarify responsibilities, provide a pathway for communication and ultimately maximize efficiency and productivity. The board of directors is thus an ironic component to the organizational structure as this group of top individuals that oversee all corporate activities are often the most unprofessional.

However, when one considers the bigger picture, as Gillespie points out, its not actually that ironic. The board of directors is often appointed by the company CEO, who in turn is kept in office by the board of directors. See the pictures becoming clearer? These CEOs staff their boards with supporters in order to guarantee the continuance of their power and salary.

This structure is in obvious need of an overhaul.

Categories
Business News

Accounting Fraud: You can do it too!

Satyam

It seems, with the number of accounting frauds exposed in recent years, that company execs–such as Mr. Raju of Satyam Inc.–still believe that they can manipulate numbers on income statements and balance sheets to their advantage without being caught.

“Mr. Raju admitted that the September quarter accounts for last year included a non-existent cash and bank balances of Rs50.40bn ($1bn), non-existent accrued interest of Rs3.76bn and other irregularities.

In the September quarter alone, the operating margin was shown as 24% of revenue compared with an actual operating margin of 3%, due to inflated revenue and profit figures.” – FT.com

The fallout from the exposure of these falsified accounts has included a drop in Satyam’s stock price of 80% and the expectation that the company will go bankrupt. However, it is not these consequences that are interesting to me, its the fact that companies can and do get away with accounting fraud.

The fact that huge, well-respected international audit firms such as PriceWaterhouseCoopers, who audited Satyam for years, are able to overlook discrepancies in reported financial figures presents a huge problem. It is the job of these auditors to dig for background information on companies’ transactions in order to confirm what has been reported. There has been a  history in recent years of companies–such as Worldcom and Enron–falsifying the assets portion of their balance sheets and the expenses portion of their income statements and getting away with it. If these audit firms are not able to improve their investigative work, companies will continue capitalizing on the their incompetence.

Categories
Business News

Entrepreneurial Ethics: When is it okay to squish the little guys?

Entrepreneurs keep their eyes peeled for any available entry point into a market, looking to capitalize on unexploited resources and opportunities, ready to spring into action as soon as they predict profitability. But where do ethics play in? When is it okay for larger companies, with more stability and resources to expand, to squeeze the life out of small businesses just trying to stay afloat?

Sightline bus

A case in point is that of the expansion of Oregon-based Sightline Tours into Vancouver. Already successful in the States, and armed with a fleet of flashy, sustainability-conscious buses, Sightline surged into the Vancouver sightseeing market in 2008 after the exit of one of the largest bus tour companies, Grey Line. This large shift in the industry, along with already flagging tourism, has led to the subsequent exit from the market of many smaller, often family owned and operated businesses. Even more small businesses are taking huge profit hits as Sightline now controls the industry at Vancouver’s cruise ports.

This strategic entrance and domination of the market by Sightline is no doubt intelligent and well-executed. But is it ethical? In our profit-obsessed world, entrepreneurs and executives are obsessed with exploiting all opportunities to earn a buck, but they often do so at the expense of the livelihood of many smaller businesses. By seizing large chunks of market demand, these growing companies cause numerous job losses and failed companies. Should entrepreneurs be required to adhere to an ethics code? Is our money-hungry world capable of such a thing? Questions for the future.

Categories
Business News

Hewlett Packard – To spy or not to spy?

hp_logo_1

We’ve become accustomed in recent years to hearing reports of newly uncovered ethical scandals involving well-known, and often well-respected, corporations. These scandals most often involve fraud: the use of ponzi schemes and false-advertising to con clients out of considerable sums of money. With the recent arrest and trial of Bernie Madoff fresh in the minds of North Americans, people are taking precautions to ensure that they do not fall victims to such schemes. Because of this current trend of fraud, it came as a surprise to me to read about a different type of ethical misconduct: that of computer giant Hewlett Packard.


Hewlett Packard Spying Scandal


In short, HP executives were discovered to be employing information theft to set up a wire-tapping system that was keeping tabs on hundreds of fellow executives, employees, journalists and clients. Despite the obvious violation of basic ethical principles such as the right to privacy, the implications of HP’s actions set my mind thinking. One would assume that if a company chooses to hire an employee or executive, they have a certain amount of trust that that employee will conduct themselves with the company’s best interests in mind. Why, then, should the company find it necessary to monitor employees’ conversations? By simply hiring trustworthy, honest employees, this gross violation of rights would be entirely avoidable.

Spam prevention powered by Akismet