Categories
Business News

Money for Nothing: The irony in corporate boards

Apart from being quite amusing, this interview with the satirical co-author John Gillespie of “Money for Nothing: How the Failure of Corporate Boards is Ruining American Business and Costing Us Trillions” opened my eyes to a major problem in business and the irony that huge, successful companies are still using the inefficient, controversial, and often un-businesslike corporate model which includes advisory boards.money_for_nothing.03

Also referred to as a “board of directors”, the corporate board is an assembly of elected or appointed individuals who oversee the activities of a specific company or organization. In for-profit companies, this board is responsible to the stakeholders, reviewing the broad policies of the company in order to ensure that it operates in the stakeholders’ best interest. The board is also responsible for appointing a chief executive (CEO) whom they believe will best run the company and adhere to its guiding principles.

In their book, John Gillespie and David Zweig slam the corporate board, portraying it as a farce. The fact that boards often include irresponsible individuals with no background in business displays an odd inconsistency in companies that built their fortunes and status on efficiency, commitment and hard-work. Organizational structures are in place to clarify responsibilities, provide a pathway for communication and ultimately maximize efficiency and productivity. The board of directors is thus an ironic component to the organizational structure as this group of top individuals that oversee all corporate activities are often the most unprofessional.

However, when one considers the bigger picture, as Gillespie points out, its not actually that ironic. The board of directors is often appointed by the company CEO, who in turn is kept in office by the board of directors. See the pictures becoming clearer? These CEOs staff their boards with supporters in order to guarantee the continuance of their power and salary.

This structure is in obvious need of an overhaul.

Categories
Business News

Accounting Fraud: You can do it too!

Satyam

It seems, with the number of accounting frauds exposed in recent years, that company execs–such as Mr. Raju of Satyam Inc.–still believe that they can manipulate numbers on income statements and balance sheets to their advantage without being caught.

“Mr. Raju admitted that the September quarter accounts for last year included a non-existent cash and bank balances of Rs50.40bn ($1bn), non-existent accrued interest of Rs3.76bn and other irregularities.

In the September quarter alone, the operating margin was shown as 24% of revenue compared with an actual operating margin of 3%, due to inflated revenue and profit figures.” – FT.com

The fallout from the exposure of these falsified accounts has included a drop in Satyam’s stock price of 80% and the expectation that the company will go bankrupt. However, it is not these consequences that are interesting to me, its the fact that companies can and do get away with accounting fraud.

The fact that huge, well-respected international audit firms such as PriceWaterhouseCoopers, who audited Satyam for years, are able to overlook discrepancies in reported financial figures presents a huge problem. It is the job of these auditors to dig for background information on companies’ transactions in order to confirm what has been reported. There has been a  history in recent years of companies–such as Worldcom and Enron–falsifying the assets portion of their balance sheets and the expenses portion of their income statements and getting away with it. If these audit firms are not able to improve their investigative work, companies will continue capitalizing on the their incompetence.

Categories
Business News

Branding: Don’t Fix it if it’s Not Broken

In the modern cut-throat market where competition is fierce and the risk of failing is very real, some large companies, even those with solid market dominance, are becoming hyper-vigilant. This means that teams are being hired to analyze and manage every aspect of these companies’ products. This is very likely beneficial in most situations, but these teams’ desire to be active and improve already strong, stable products could lead to bad business decisions, as with the redesign of Tropicana’s classic cartons in 2009.tropicana

In conjunction with an outside consulting firm, Tropicana spent $35 million on a new branding campaign which involved the design of a new carton for their juices which would put the class straw-in-orange design to rest. Despite the time, money and resources spent on this campaign, Tropicana was soon flooded with complaints from customers who wanted the straw design back, and Tropicana was soon forced to abandon the new design.

This business mistake provides a valuable lesson for my future endeavors in the business world. When I first enter the workforce fresh out of business school, I will likely be overeager to apply what I’ve learnt and make valuable contributions to the company for which I work. However, I must not forget the fundamental maxim: if it’s not broken don’t fix it.


New York Times: Tropicana Discovers Some Buyers Are Passionate About Packaging

Categories
Business News

Hewlett Packard – To spy or not to spy?

hp_logo_1

We’ve become accustomed in recent years to hearing reports of newly uncovered ethical scandals involving well-known, and often well-respected, corporations. These scandals most often involve fraud: the use of ponzi schemes and false-advertising to con clients out of considerable sums of money. With the recent arrest and trial of Bernie Madoff fresh in the minds of North Americans, people are taking precautions to ensure that they do not fall victims to such schemes. Because of this current trend of fraud, it came as a surprise to me to read about a different type of ethical misconduct: that of computer giant Hewlett Packard.


Hewlett Packard Spying Scandal


In short, HP executives were discovered to be employing information theft to set up a wire-tapping system that was keeping tabs on hundreds of fellow executives, employees, journalists and clients. Despite the obvious violation of basic ethical principles such as the right to privacy, the implications of HP’s actions set my mind thinking. One would assume that if a company chooses to hire an employee or executive, they have a certain amount of trust that that employee will conduct themselves with the company’s best interests in mind. Why, then, should the company find it necessary to monitor employees’ conversations? By simply hiring trustworthy, honest employees, this gross violation of rights would be entirely avoidable.

Spam prevention powered by Akismet