Lab 5: Assessing the Environmental Risks of a Proposed Development Project
EIA_Garibaldi shows an environmental assessment for a proposal to construct a ski resort in Garibaldi Park, at Squamish.
Hillshade_EIA shows the lighting or shading effect of the sun incident on a landscape of varying elevations, a Hillshade.
EIA_ClientMemo includes a client memo that summarizes the methods and results of my analysis, as well as some recommendations to aid my client in the direction and focus of their project proposal.
Personally, I do not think this project should continue unless they find a way to integrate the construction and operation of the ski resort into the original ecosystem, so as to minimize potential environmental risk. This does not differ from what I wrote in my memo, since it would be in my client’s interest to assuredly maintain economic viability by minimizing their project’s environmental risk. Environmental projects are generally complicated because they challenge personal and group ethics, making it difficult to determine whether overall social, economic, and/or cultural benefits outweigh the environmental costs in both the short and long term. This project, in particular, is problematic as it is subject to some degree of scientific (information deficit) and moral (understanding) uncertainty, and the overall complexity and unpredictable responses of natural versus anthropogenic working ecosystems needs to be considered. Information deficits are elements of the “known unknowns,” that is the information we know we do not have, and “unknown unknowns,” that is the information we do not know we don’t have. Moral certainty and uncertainty is then built on this information or lack thereof. System complexity and unpredictability, on the other hand, is a problem evident in this analysis. The near-half percentage of environmental damage from constructing the ski resort alone poses a significant risk against the project. Interconnectedness of ecosystems make anthropogenic interference with them unpredictable and costly. That and with a local percentage of 48.5% of protected area at risk, it is assumed that the overall percentage of risk from a macro-scale environmental assessment (which would include species and ecosystems outside or just surrounding the project boundary area) would be underestimated. Underestimating risk would then give way to great and unpredictable consequences.
Accomplishment/s:
- Assessed potential environmental impacts that would impede long term economic feasibility of the proposed project to be insufficient for approval
- Recommended alternative action plan for an environmentally integrated business establishment for reduced environmental risk and economic sustainability