I found it very interesting that on the discussion page of our wiki activity was very similar to the discussion pages that we use in Vista. I guess a lot of it has to do with what we’re comfortable with, even though the wiki discussion page doesn’t really lend itself well to threaded discussions similar to what we use in Vista.
That being said, it really was more of a “discussion” than I have seen on many wiki discussion pages. Usually the discussion is more of a recorded history, with maybe a rationale for why an author made the changes that he or she did. Personally, I’d rather see a rationale and no discussion than a discussion an no rationale, as I always like to learn about the thinking and reasoning that went into a decision. However, a bit of a hybrid would be ideal, where a rationale is always included, and some back and forth exchange happens between authors as they examine philosophies behind the choices that they made.