Over the past couple of weeks, our ASTU class has had the opportunity to work within the Rare Books and Special Collections (RBSC) archives located in UBC. It has been quite an eye opening experience, being able to work so closely with the archives and holding pieces of history at our fingertips. During this time of research, I have had the privilege of exploring a small fraction of the Chung collection which exhibits “early British Columbia history, immigration and settlement, particularly of Chinese people in North America, and the Canadian Pacific Railway Company”.
Given the vastness of material within the RBSC I have only really looked into a fraction of the Chung Collection (Box 122 and Box 100). While looking through the different folders I came across many legal and formal documents such as records, insurance claims, business documents etc. But every now and then I would find a personal letter, children’s school notes and some photographs or pictures. It is through exploring these more intimate materials that I begin to try and piece together what these individuals would look like or their story. By seeing pieces of actual history, it seems as though these archives are telling a story, perhaps and autobiography of certain individuals but it is up to us (the audience) to “fill in the gaps” as Rodney G.S. Carter would say. I continued to rummage through the archival materials and piece together a story for some of the individuals portrayed in the archives. The closer I came to completing a story of an individual I found myself hesitating because there is so much information that is missing from this person’s life, and that what I perceived to be his/her story may in fact be far from the truth.
This is where I began to look at the connections between our studies of autobiography and the archives…
One of the most interesting things about studying autobiography and the archives is the parallels between the two genres. Autobiographies are written and provided to the audience, as is. The information is being described to us by author, we are to trust that he/she is telling the truth because they are creating within the genre of autobiography. Take for example our studies of Marjane Satrapi’s Persepolis, Dave Egger and Achak’s What is the What and of course Fred Wah’s Diamond Grill. Although they disclose that these biography themed works are based off personal experience and memory, we as the audience are to trust that the information is true. Now looking at the archives, the material within the collects are artifacts, they are tangible pieces of history and truth emanates with this institution. However, as noted in Carter’s article there can be a level of discrepancies within the archives themselves. Therefore a major parallel between the role of autobiographers and archivists in which they hold the power to alter the story. Stories such as What is the What bring into question the accuracy of the events in Achak Deng’s life, and whether or not these events were manipulated to gain popularity. Or, if the Chung Collection never made it to the RBSC, how could we know the real history behind the marginalized Chinese population of Canada? It is undeniable that both autobiographers and archivists hold great power in shaping how personal and societal memory is depicted. Although, there may be instances of scepticism we can only continue to rely on these individuals to uphold their obligation of sharing the truth.