Following BP’s (British Petroleum), the worst oil spill in history, senior executive David Rainey scrambled for any source estimates of the spill size to trigger the company’s response to the catastrophe. Rather than turning to researchers and consulting experts, allegations arise that Rainey turned to Wikipedia for estimates on the daily leakage. The online encyclopedia, which is virtually free for anyone to edit content, states that daily spillage was happening at rate of 5,000 barrels per day , a figure Rainy defended adamantly, far less than the independent analysis reports of 62,000. He is now under criminal investigation before a multitude of charges, including false testimony to the Congress.
Our professors in business class are constantly condemning Wikipedia is as a reliable resources for information whether that be for research projects or gaining a basic understanding of a topic. Though this online encylopedia may be a solid starting point to begin research, the fact that volunteers edit the content makes it less legitimate This makes it rather ironic how a senior executive working for one of the largest oil firms in the world, would base his most important estimations from Wikipedia. Tying this all together, the legitimacy we based our decisions is vital, regardless of future path especially in business. Gathering the correct information from a reliable source will provide great dividends in gaining customer trust and loyalty.
Works Cited:
“BP Turned to Wikipedia to Estimate Size of Spill, U.S. Alleges.” Globe and Mail 11 Apr. 2012: n. pag. Print.
Digital image. Reuters, n.d. Web. 18 Nov. 2012. <http://s1.reutersmedia.net/resources/r/?m=02&d=20120411&t=2&i=593556590&w=460&fh=&fw=&ll=&pl=&r=CBRE83A1Q2Z00>.









