Midterm 1

I think it is safe to say that this one did not go so well…  That being the case, I think it would be a good time to re-assess and reflect on my performance so that I can improve for next time.

One thing that I should do next time is to read through the questions and do the lengthiest questions first to give myself more time to think about them.  That way I won’t feel rushed to complete them at the end.  I panicked and I think that it shows in my answers.  I became more concerned with just filling space in each question rather than stopping to actually consider that what I was writing was correct.

I studied the wrong material, I didn’t actually preview the practice questions until the day prior to the exam.  I made the assumption that the course reading would play a bigger role in the exam and so I spent a fair bit of time reviewing the course readings and trying to focus on understanding the specifics that went into the papers.  Rather than doing that I should have focused on clearing up lecture material that I didn’t understand and possibly focusing on the lecture questions, making sure that I understood the biology behind the conclusions that we made in class.

I did reasonably well (by my standards anyway) on the first two questions.  I was tripped up by the 3rd and I didn’t have enough time to properly consider the 4th as there was a lot of information in the description of that question and I was in full on panic mode at that point.

You would think that by 4th year I would know how to properly prepare for exams.

3 thoughts on “Midterm 1

  1. pamk

    These things happen; I hope you did not beat yourself up too much. And, it must be particularly frustrating to get the exam and see that it’s not focused on the stuff that you have studied most and know best.

    Reply
  2. garry

    I believe Mitch?s biggest strengths are that he?s knowledgeable, intelligent, and precise. He?s knowledgeable because he knows extra information such as the adventure gene that I had no idea about, and neuron growth and differentiation which I am familiar with. He?s intelligent because he just doesn?t believe what is said but rather does his own research and comes up with his own opinion as seen from the adventure gene. He?s precise because of the way that he articulates the information in his learning journals which address the question and are easy to follow.

    Maybe put up other assignments or articles that demonstrate his skills and knowledge of techniques. But overall he covers most of it.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *