
“You mean I have to wear what?!”

In the newspaper The Province, an article with the title Mongolia Aims to Tap Coal as New Cash Cowwas featured in the September 15, 2010 edition. This article explains how the there is a large coal reserve located south of the Gobi Dessert. The amount located there “could be Mongolia’s black gold” and “Mongolia could earn up to $600 million”. After discovering this area, ” the government [has] began accepting bids from mining firms.” In this article, since the revenue from the coal is so great, the government has been overlooking the effects that mining from this area has on the land. The Gobi Dessert is has been scientifically proven to be growing at an alarming rate, yet the government has chosen to ignore this fact and continue to mine. The threat of desertification is present, however the government neglected this fact and decides to mine in that area.
Picture of a coal mining area in United States http://www.treehugger.com/files/2007/09/majority_of_american_public.php
I definitely do not think it’s unethical to charge different prices for the same product. If people are to lazy to do their own research as to where the product is less expensive and are willing to buy the product at a certain price, then yes, it is ethical to charge different prices for the same product. I feel that prices should depend on the location at which the product is sold. For example, if the product is sold in a wealthy neighborhood and people can afford to buy it at that price then selling the product doesn’t cause a problem plus it would help the company to earn more revenue. However, if the same product is sold at a less wealthy location then it would be putting more financial stress on the people, who already have trouble managing their financial issues.
The concept of charging differently for different people is known as Price Discrimination