07/12/13

Summative Presentation Week 2

@BrianneMelnyk

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

With today’s summary, I’m trying something somewhat experimental.  We’ve been told to feel free to try new things, take chances, and expand our educational thought.  I decided to take inspiration from something I’d seen on Pinterest a few months back, but was too late with my class to try.

A teacher had used memes to explain class rules.  Being nerdy like that, I found it hilarious.  Memes have such visual appeal, and I decided to try and create my own, educational memes, in order to present my learning for the week.  What is a meme?  It can be thought of as an element of culture passed from one individual to another, or an image or video being passed on the Internet.  The word meme comes from a Greek word meaning something imitated.  Memes are very popular amongst kids online.  And me.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As the week started, I had come to a realization.  I love technology.  I use technology.  I’m an advocate for technology.  However, I tended not to use it to create connections.  I used it with students, had students use it, but usually in isolation.  We may have looked at something on Twitter, such as Chris Hadfield’s pictures from space, but didn’t add anything back in.  We were consumers.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I realized that this was reflected in how my school district has offered technology pro-d.  There are often some interesting things, usually about how to use a program, and usually never a reason why.  Our last districtwide pro-d was entirely tech based, yet I couldn’t find a single session that inspired me.  Even as I began my inquiry, I was focused on the end product rather than the why.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As a group, we began researching and pulling in ideas from different sources.  We found that while there are varying opinions on whether the use of technology and social media is positive for students, the gains were far more valuable than the losses.  One article gave an excellent outline for issues to consider when considering using new technology, the first being, why are you using it?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

How is it better than what you already do?  What new connection or aspect to the project can the technology bring?  This formed the basis for my thought this week.  It is not enough to simply use or consume the technology.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As educators, we’ve all experienced resistance to change.  This change can be both simple and complex.  This can happen for various reasons.  Some have been frustrated when trying to use technology.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Some haven’t had the experience in using it, or training.  Some simply haven’t ever heard a reason why they should.  Some educators are nearing the end of their careers and have little interest in changing.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Many of us have felt overwhelmed and frustrated in the last two weeks as we navigate Mindmeister, Pearltrees, Diigo, Twitter, Kindle, blogs, and more.  The next time a colleague says they’re frustrated by technology, think back to how you’ve felt and empathize.  It isn’t easy to change.  But change is part of the process of life.  It is our role to help facilitate that change.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

We change, we adapt, we hopefully try and make things better.  Better isn’t always easy.  However, our students are worth the effort. They’re worth our frustrations as Internet connections grind to a halt, as programs freeze, as we sift through 20 different apps that are all so close, yet not quite exactly what we need.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Even if Grumpy Cat thinks otherwise.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

They’re worth sharing ideas and reasoning at a staff meeting.  They’re worth offering a session for other teachers as professional development.  They’re worth spending far too much time on Twitter than could possibly be healthy.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

When thinking about the why of why we’re using technology, don’t forget our biggest reason why.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Our students.

07/9/13

Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants

There is a quote in an article I’m reading for my inquiry project that seemed to fit in quite well with some of the impressive words we learned about in class today, such as sociocultural homeostasis, and institutional isomorphism. Just try saying those five times fast.

The article is entitled The Innovative use of Personal Smart Devices by Students to Support their Learning, by Anne Nortcliffe and Andrew Middleton.

“… the ‘strong’ disruption that results from the advent of ubiquitous, personally owned mobile technologies and how the ‘long-term consequences must be to challenge the authority of the curriculum’ and dominant thinking about the nature of formal learning.”

While I disagree about bring your own device (BYOD) on many levels, including the creation of the haves and have nots, trying to get everything running on multiple platforms, lack of common or shared apps, devices not running at full operation due to battery drain or damage, alright, perhaps I could go on for longer… however, I do believe that the much more affordable portable devices that can readily access the world do create the need to challenge the dominant thinking about formal learning.

If schools are institutions brought to life by those who learn in them, those who work in them, and the community, should not the institution reflect the lives of those souls? When I first typed that sentence I had only included those who work and the community… perhaps my brain associated students with working in the schools, but I felt the need to be more explicit. Marc Prensky creates the image of students as digital natives, in comparison to most teachers as digital immigrants. In reflection of my teaching experience, I think he is for the most part correct.

I like to try and argue otherwise for myself. I had a Commodore 64, and waited 30 minutes for Donald Duck’s Playground to load. I had an Atari, and Intellivision, and argue that Super Mario Brothers 3 is still the best of the Mario games. I have multiple blogs, have created web sites, use facebook, tweet, and get my news from websites as opposed to newspapers. However, I’m still not in league with my students who were born after the internet was available in many homes. I remember how exciting it was when our school was connected to the internet in 1996… but we didn’t know what to do with it. While I may feel a level of comfort, I was not born to it. The disparity is even greater for many of my colleagues.

However, we are strong voices regarding decision making that affects our classrooms. Do we each continue doing our disparate practices? Do we rise as a group and advocate strongly for change? The only certainty I have is that we certainly must not do nothing. We owe our students much more.

07/6/13

Random musings of a developing mind…

As I move through LIBE 477B, I cannot help but be inspired by my classmates.  To a one, they are all so passionate, so willing to try, to innovate, to create.  I truly believe that they will return in September full of energy to try in their schools all that they have learned.

Some are in a similar situation to myself in that they do not hold what the future holds.  I believe this to be a fallacy.  The future holds innovation, creativity, and an exploration of the future that will benefit the students be it as a teacher-librarian, a TOC, or as a parent.

I was reminded to remain aware of why I am doing this, what the pedagogy is, what the learning outcomes are.  I took a look at the admittedly ancient IRP for  English 7.  Students are explicitly expected to explain connections to the world, yet how can they do this when they are excluded from it?  That might be a bit of overuse of alliteration, but this thought is beginning to shape what I’m doing as an educator.  How can I connect my students to their peers, their families, their communities, their world?  ICT has made this a possibility that didn’t exist when I was a child.

I believe that each generation should seek to improve things for the next.  I would like  to establish my part in doing so.