3D TV

Recently, after my friend was interested in purchasing a new TV set, I headed down to Future Shop to check our some TV’s. I finally got the chance to check out these 3D tv’s everyone has been talking about. I for one don’t understand that need. I have zero interest in wearing weird glasses that make me feel slightly nauseous, that cost over $100 bucks each. Could you imagine being a parent to more than 2 children and having to make sure that all of you kids had these ridiculous glasses in order to sit down and watch a family movie together?

According to CBC only 2% of total TV sales were 3D and the sales are on a “slow boil” because they are expected to “ramp up” in the next few year. I for one disagree because they are over-priced and too specific, as in you need 3D movies to watch on them and 3D glasses to watch them. I have always disliked anything 3D call me old fashioned, but I can accept the fact that TV is not REAL and I don’t need 3 dimensions to try and persuade me that what I am seeing is more realistic.
I honestly prefer the Sharp Aquos Quattron, this TV adds a new dimension of colour (yellow) to its screen and the images are for lack of a better word “breath-taking” I don’t care or know much about TV specs, but I wanted this television, the vividness of the images and the clarity/colours were unreal, I would rather spend money on that and not need to wear those 3D glasses!

CBC has a an article that discusses this slow, but sure increase of interest:

3D TV on a slow boil

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *