{"id":5398,"date":"2017-12-10T12:38:30","date_gmt":"2017-12-10T20:38:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/mongolia\/?p=5398"},"modified":"2017-12-10T12:38:30","modified_gmt":"2017-12-10T20:38:30","slug":"canada-mongolia-fipa-investment","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/mongolia\/2017\/canada-mongolia-fipa-investment\/","title":{"rendered":"Guest Post: Agreement between Canada and Mongolia for the Promotion and Protection of Investments \u2013 a Glance at Its Nature, Significance and Features"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><em>By Bajar Scharaw<\/em><\/p>\n<p>On 8 September 2016, Canada and Mongolia signed an international <a href=\"http:\/\/www.international.gc.ca\/trade-commerce\/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux\/agr-acc\/mongolia-mongolie\/fipa-apie\/text-texte\/canada_mongolia-mongolie.aspx?lang=eng\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Agreement for the Promotion and Protection of Investments<\/a> (the Canada-Mongolia Investment Agreement). The Agreement entered into force on 24 February 2017 and created legally-binding obligations for both countries that can be enforced by investors of either country against the other country before an international arbitral tribunal. This blog post provides an overview of the nature and significance of the Canada-Mongolia Investment Agreement and briefly outlines some of its features compared with other international agreements of this kind.<\/p>\n<h2>Nature of international investment agreements<\/h2>\n<p>The Canada-Mongolia Investment Agreement forms part of a worldwide web of similar international investment agreements (IIAs) that have been entered into between two States (the parties) to promote and protect foreign investments. It is estimated that countries worldwide have concluded more than 2,900 of such bilateral IIAs. Currently, Germany is leading with a total of 133 concluded IIAs, followed by China which created 129 IIAs. While Canada is a party to 32 IIAs, Mongolia entered into no less than 43 IIAs with countries from all over the world. In East Asia and the Pacific, Mongolia is a frontrunner with respect to the conclusion of IIAs. According to a <a href=\"https:\/\/papers.ssrn.com\/sol3\/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2591186\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">survey<\/a>, Mongolia took the seventh place among 24 economies in that region in 2015: only China (129), South Korea (90), Malaysia (68), Vietnam (60), Indonesia (51), and Singapore (45) had more bilateral IIAs than Mongolia.<\/p>\n<p>Countries conclude IIAs such as the Canada-Mongolia Investment Agreement to attract foreign investments into the country or to protect foreign investments of their nationals abroad. IIAs seek to promote in- and outbound foreign investments by providing international rules that protect investments (property and other assets) made by investors of one party to the IIA <em>within the territory of the other party<\/em> (the host State). For example, IIAs require that expropriations of investors from the other party may only occur in the public interest, under due process of law, on a non-discriminatory basis and against compensation. IIAs stipulate that investors from the other party may freely transfer their funds and capital out of the host State. Furthermore, they require the host State to treat investors from the other party \u201cfairly and equitably\u201d and often to accord such investors a treatment no less favourable than that accorded to own nationals in the same situation (principle of national treatment). The rules in IIAs are of international nature, which means that they cannot be modified unilaterally by one party or through national legislation.<\/p>\n<p>In the case of a dispute, IIAs allow investors from one party to file a suit against the other party (the host State) if the latter has treated such an investor in its territory in a way that violates the above mentioned IIA protection rules. To this end, the IIA entitles an investor to initiate an international arbitration outside the host State. IIAs provide a (State-independent) international arbitral tribunal with seat in Washington D.C., Geneva or elsewhere with the legal power to render a binding decision on whether the host State has indeed violated rules in the IIA and to award compensation to the investor for any damages suffered.<\/p>\n<h2>Significance of the Canada-Mongolia Investment Agreement<\/h2>\n<p>Traditionally, Mongolia\u2019s extractive industries receive the lion share of foreign investments in the country. According to the UN\u2019s <a href=\"http:\/\/unctad.org\/en\/pages\/PublicationWebflyer.aspx?publicationid=758\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Investment Policy Review on Mongolia<\/a>, Canada (with Vancouver as the world\u2019s \u201cmining capital\u201d) held an 8% share in Mongolia\u2019s total foreign-investment inflows in 1990-2012. While China was by far the largest source of such inflows with a 32% share during the same period, Canada represented thus one of the most significant sources for foreign investments in Mongolia.<\/p>\n<p>Despite this fact, Canada (and its investors) lacked an IIA with Mongolia for a long time (both countries started to conclude IIAs in the 1990s). Furthermore, unlike Mongolia, Canada is no party to the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.energycharter.org\/process\/energy-charter-treaty-1994\/energy-charter-treaty\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Energy Charter Treaty<\/a> as a multilateral international agreement with IIA-similar protection rules. In view of the foregoing, the Canada-Mongolia Investment Agreement is of high relevance as it fills a protection gap. With the Agreement\u2019s ratification in February 2017, Canadian investors are entitled to rely on special international rules for the protection of their investments in Mongolia.<\/p>\n<h2>Features of the Canada-Mongolia Investment Agreement<\/h2>\n<p>The Canada-Mongolia Investment Agreement provides those protection rules that are characteristic for virtually all IIAs (see above). In addition, the two countries (the Parties) agreed on various further rules that let the Agreement clearly stand out against the vast majority of current IIAs. Particularly noteworthy are the following additional rules:<\/p>\n<p>Article 12 (entitled \u201cTransparency\u201d) requires the Parties to promptly publish investment-relevant laws and regulations, to publish in advance such proposed measures and to provide \u201cinterested persons\u201d a \u201creasonable opportunity\u201d to comment. Importantly, Article 14 (\u201cCorporate Social Responsibility\u201d) requires the Parties to encourage investors to voluntarily incorporate internationally recognized social standards in their practices and internal policies, and to address human rights, labour issues, the environment, community relations and anti-corruption (see also the UN <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ohchr.org\/Documents\/Publications\/GuidingPrinciplesBusinessHR_EN.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights<\/a>). According to Article 15 (\u201cHealth, Safety and Environmental Measures\u201d), the Parties recognize that it is inappropriate to encourage investment inflows by relaxing domestic health, safety or environmental measures.<\/p>\n<p>The Agreement seeks to secure the Parties\u2019 regulatory leeway in areas that are of particular concern to them, including cultural aspects. For this purpose, Article 16 provides special \u201creservations and exceptions\u201d relating to the application of certain investment protection rules of the Agreement. For example, Mongolia\u2019s obligation to treat Canadian investors no less favourably than own citizens (Article 4) does not apply with respect to nationality requirements for the ownership of land. This reflects Mongolia\u2019s strong commitment to the traditional nomadic way of life. Furthermore, Article 17 provides \u201cgeneral exceptions\u201d and states, for instance, that nothing in the Agreement shall prevent a Party from adopting measures necessary for (i) the protection of human, animal or plant life or health and (ii) the conservation of living or non-living exhaustible natural resources.<\/p>\n<p>Lastly, the procedural rules (see above) for the enforcement of the Agreement by international arbitration are strikingly detailed to increase legal certainty. For example, Article 25 requires the disputing parties (<em>i.e.<\/em> an investor from one Party and the other Party) to select arbitrators with expertise and\/or experience in public international law, international investment or trade law, or in resolving disputes arising under IIAs. It is especially worth mentioning that Article 30 requires the Parties to publish an arbitral tribunal\u2019s decision and that oral hearings are open to the public. This is exceptional for IIAs and in line with the UN\u2019s recent general initiative to increase transparency in international arbitrations between investors and States (see <a href=\"http:\/\/www.uncitral.org\/uncitral\/uncitral_texts\/arbitration\/2014Transparency_Convention.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">here<\/a>). So far, no dispute has arisen under the Canada-Mongolia Investment Agreement.<\/p>\n<h2>About the Author<\/h2>\n<p>Dr. iur. Bajar Scharaw, LL.M. (UQ) is the author of the book <a href=\"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/de\/book\/9783319660882\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>The Protection of Foreign Investments in Mongolia: Treaties, Domestic Law, and Contracts on Investments in International Comparison and Arbitral Practice<\/em><\/a> (Springer 2017). He is a German lawyer admitted to the bar in Frankfurt am Main and practicing in the public international law\/ international arbitration group of a US law firm. This contribution is written in the author\u2019s private capacity and does not express the views of his law firm or its clients.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By Bajar Scharaw On 8 September 2016, Canada and Mongolia signed an international Agreement for the Promotion and Protection of Investments (the Canada-Mongolia Investment Agreement). The Agreement entered into force on 24 February 2017 and created legally-binding obligations for both &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/mongolia\/2017\/canada-mongolia-fipa-investment\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6444,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[983154,68,307908,8443,307862,2552,4464],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5398","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bajar-scharaw","category-canada","category-foreign-investment","category-foreign-policy","category-international-agreements","category-law","category-trade"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/mongolia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5398","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/mongolia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/mongolia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/mongolia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6444"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/mongolia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5398"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/mongolia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5398\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5400,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/mongolia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5398\/revisions\/5400"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/mongolia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5398"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/mongolia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5398"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/mongolia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5398"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}