UBC CFE Final thoughts and lessons

During the duration of this CFE, many lessons were learned through the schools, but many more were learned outside as well.  Many of our life lessons were learned from the apartment that we stayed in.  This apartment was provided by Technologico de Monterrey at no cost to us, but there were lots of problems that also came along with it.  There was no wifi, no hot water, the floorboards were uneven, the refrigerators were not fully working, there was no washing machine, etc.

At first we were abhorred at our bad luck, but overtime, we overcame each problem one by one.  To combat not having wifi, we downloaded offline versions of movies to watch while we were at school so that we had something to watch at our apartment.  To combat not having hot water, we decided to make use of the showers at school.  For the weak refrigerators, we just bought food that didn’t need refrigerating.

I personally felt that the biggest accomplishment that we achieved was overcoming the lack of a washing machine.  Since there was no washing machine, we had to improvise by using a bucket and a washing sink.  We couldn’t just leave our dirty clothes because we needed more to wear.  The process we went through was to fill a bucket of water and detergent, then added our dirty clothes.  After soaking the clothes, we put them into the sink to rinse out then we hand wrung and hung the clothes.  Since we didn’t have hangers, we had to hang them wherever we could (on chairs, in closets, etc.).

20160507_094958

20160507_094437 20160507_094448

This shows our capabilities of improvisation, adaptability, and thinking on the spot.  This reflects skills needed by beginning teachers because lessons may not go as we plan for them to be.  As a result, we have to be able to think on our toes and change what we have to or adapt our lesson so that we get our lesson going and still keeping to our lesson objectives.  We need to use all tools at our disposal even if it wasn’t something that has a use that it was intended for.

UBC CFE Day 12 (Tuesday)

After observing exams yesterday and today, here are some things that I have noticed:

  1. Students do not help set up the classroom into exam formation, unless asked multiple times or nagged
  2. When students start exams, they seem to know well in advance what is expected because they don’t seem to have questions about the exams themselves
  3. Teachers take different stances in the exam room (some stay in one general location in the class and only move when students have questions, others constantly move around the room).

Point number one taught me one thing.  Students have trouble with verbal cues.  From my own experiences, I need to have drawn a diagram on the board in advance in order for students to even get an idea of what I want them to do.  Another thing that it showed me was that in a classroom where they use the individual coloured chairs, it may be great for teaching lessons, but when it comes to exams, it is a mess to try and set up and organize.  Since the chairs are individual from each other, one needs to move each and every chair into place.  On top of that, the chairs are wheeled so students will keep moving around.  I prefer a class where there are desks set up in a way that students can just come in, find a spot and then are ready for their exam.

Point number two showed me that teachers probably prepared their students weeks in advance on what to expect for the exam.  I remember telling students a weekend before a test and they would still have questions on the day of the test.  This taught me that students who are well prepared and know what to expect seem to panic less.  This is probably something that I should remember so that students don’t panic as much on the day of the test.

The last point is more of a personal preference thing.  From my own experience, I have done both of the mentioned ways of invigilating an exam.  It all depends on if I have things to do.  I have walked around the classroom answering questions as needed, I have also sat at a desk watching the room while marking things on my computer.  I feel like it just depends on how confident the teacher is with the environment that they set up for non-cheating.  Personally, I feel like during my practicum, I set up a pretty good environment where students didn’t feel like they had to cheat.

UBC CFE Day 11 (Monday)

This week we are back at Technologico de Monterrey for two days then we will have finished our duties.  This week is exam week, so we have, and will be, helping teachers with invigilating exams and seeing how they set up and organize their individual exams.  Tomorrow I will discuss all the similarities and differences of all the different exams.

UBC CFE Days 9&10 (Thursday and Friday)

So the last two days I was pretty well bedridden all day with the flu so I was not very capable of helping my colleagues out at school.  Luckily, the girl’s Catholic school was not in session on Thursday (apparently for Cinco de Mayo), so my colleagues went back to Technologico de Monterrey to try and help with anything they could help with, while I rested up.  On Friday, I went to the girl’s Catholic school in the morning, but by recommendation of our coordinator, I was examined by the school physician and after receiving some medication, they suggested I go home and rest for the rest of the day.

Even though I could not actively participate in teaching it was recommended that I compare and contrast the two schools that we have helped at.  So this is what my blog today will be about.

 

Technologico de Monterrey:

This school is in the top three of all private schools in all of Mexico.  With multiple campuses across Mexico (three in Mexico City area) they have three different programs, their most well known is their IB program.  These students are usually among the more wealthy of Mexican people (as one teacher puts it, “they are either rich children or Military children…”).  Technologico de Monterrey is not only isolated to high school, they also have THE most prestigious business entrepreneurship school in all of Latin America.  Students in the high school have the choice of studying abroad, going to the business school, or going to other post secondary institutions upon graduation (depending on the program they chose to enroll into in high school).  Technologico de Monterrey offers a wide variety of extracurricular activities including, Soccer (of course), American Football, Volleyball, Basketball, and Cheer and Dance.  They also offer some of these activities to their feeder schools to groom them for when they come to Technologico de Monterrey.

Being such a prestigious school, there is an extremely high security system in place.  Aside from thick steel barred fences and gates, there were armed guards and security cameras at all the entrances.  One could not enter without a valid Technologico de Monterrey student ID, Staff ID, or if you’re a guest you need to have notified the school in advance so that someone of authority could add your name to a list for the security team.  Taxis and Uber cabs were allowed to go into the campus to pick up and drop off people, but they had to fill out a slip with there they were coming from and where they were going afterwards as well as leaving a piece of ID with the security team until they left the premises.

In the classroom, the set up is either the individual coloured chairs (that was mentioned in one of my previous blog posts), or the long tables that are able to seat 3-4 people.  Teachers have the autonomy to choose whether to teach their class in English or in Spanish, and many of them have other jobs (teaching 1-2 blocks is just a hobby, passion, or a way to make a little bit of extra cash).  One example is a sustainability teacher who works for Coca Cola Mexico as a sustainability expert.

 

Instituto Mexicano Regina:

Similar to Technologico de Monterrey, Instituto Mexicano Regina is also a private school with multiple campuses across Mexico.  The campus that we were at was the original one that was started by nuns (from Spain I think), This campus has around 80 years of history (to put this into perspective, one of the teachers who is 40 had a great grandmother who attended the school as a girl).  This campus has stayed true to the original intent of being an all-girls school (some of the newer campuses are co-ed).  This school is very exclusive, it is not necessarily the rich girls that can get in, but the best chance to be accepted is if you had a mother or grandmother who attended the school previously.  Unlike Technologico de Monterrey, they have programs running from Pre-K – 12 and they have no extra curricular activities offered (although many of them are in programs outside of school, such as dance).  One thing that we noticed almost immediately was the whole difference in atmosphere.  The girls were very curious having visitors around (this could tie in with the fact that it is an all-girls school maybe?).  Also, it seemed like more students were willing to and were capable of speaking proficient English (at Technologico de Monterrey, we had to approach students and ask if they spoke English).  Teachers noticed that while we were around, students would come and ask them something in English, when they usually ask it in Spanish.  The girls at this school are divided into three classes based on their English capabilities, but all girls take the same courses (it’s just the level of English being taught to them that is different).  Supposedly, by the time they graduate, these girls will have the credentials to teach English (which seems to be their big focus).

The security is also very tight at this school.  Even though there are no armed guards, students are all driven to school by buses.  Every bus that enters the campus gets checked off by someone who works at the school to ensure that all the buses have been accounted for.  Each bus has a driver and a “bus mother”, both are exactly the same day in and day out on their specific bus route.  Once on campus, students enter through open gates (which are immediately closed when all the buses have been accounted for).  During this whole process, the nuns and other school staff patrol the gates to make sure that no one goes into the school who didn’t come off one of the buses.  Once everyone is safely inside and the gates closed, the only way in is through a barred gate that needs to be buzzed open.  Once past that one needs to sign in with the secretary and then buzzed in through another door only when a school representative is available to take you in.

Classrooms at this school are set up in the old-fashioned way of individual chairs and desks.  As mentioned in a previous blog post, students stay in their class unless they have a subject that requires a different facility.  Teachers here also have autonomy over what language they choose to teach with, however, with the whole English credentials they strive for, students are strongly encouraged to use English on a day to day basis.  Teachers here do not get paid a large amount, they literally get paid equivalent to $10 CAD an hour.  Many of these teachers are not here for the money, but more for the passion of teaching.  Some of these teachers have alternative incomes (either from another job, or a spouse).

 

During our stay, we did not get a chance to observe in a public school setting.  However, we can see how different schools are just within the private sector.  The little I have heard about public schools in Mexico is pretty horrendous.  Class sizes ranging from 35-50 students and no EAs to help with IEPs or anything.  During my 10 week practicum, my classes ranged from 20-28 students, and the highest number doesn’t even hit the bottom border of public schools here.  That is a scary thought, because some days it took all I had just to maintain control in my classes during my 10 week practicum, I can’t imagine dealing with 35-50 students on a regular basis for the rest of my career.

UBC CFE Day 8 (Wednesday)

Today we helped out in three classes, all of them were some sort of English class.

In the first class we helped students with their presentations about countries they would like to visit.  The groups first presented to us so that we could see their overall presentation.  Afterwards, we worked in small groups to help individual students work on memorization, presentation tips, and pacing.  The one student that I worked with the most asked me for my suggestions and I taught her some tricks.  for pacing, I helped edit her script by shortening parts by simplifying things and by taking out unnecessarily extensive/repetitive parts.  In terms of memorization and presentation tips, I suggested having a PowerPoint slide for each paragraph she had, and to have short notes and pictures to help guide her through her presentation.  In doing so, she can use the pictures to guide her thoughts and also help her classmates with staying engaged and understanding what she is presenting.  I made great progress with this student, we aimed for 1 minute and 30 seconds for reciting her part of the group presentation.  Her initial trial was 1 minute and 35 seconds, and after editing her script, she read the script at a slower pace but there was better emphasis and she managed to finish reading the script in 1 minute and 25 seconds (10 seconds less than her first trial).

In the second class, we did the same game that we did on Monday with a different class.  What I observed this time around is that this group of girls were less active and competitive than the other group on Monday.  Despite what seemed like a lack of interest, this class still claimed to also have fun with this game.  This goes to prove that the same lesson can be received differently by different classes based on class dynamics.

The third class was also working on creating presentations.  This class was researching styles of art and artists.  The one group I helped the most was researching about origami.  They asked my opinion on which thing to fold and research about.  I suggested the origami crane because it is probably the most famous item to fold.  I also suggested looking up the story about the 1,000 origami cranes, as they didn’t know the significance about the origami cranes.  This taught me the significance of incorporating other countries cultural themes to get a better world view when doing projects.

UBC CFE Day 7 (Tuesday)

Once again today we were at the all-girls Catholic school.  It was almost like we were celebrities the way everyone kept on approaching and talking to us.  As a last minute decision, we were asked if we wanted to accompany a group of girls on their field trip to a Jewish holocaust museum.  It was a coincidence that three girls just happened to no show up so there were just enough space for the three of us to tag along.  This was a good experience for us to help out as chaperons for a field trip because I haven’t experienced a field trip during my practicum.  This groups of girls were pretty easy to manage and chaperon because we were split up into three groups and each group had a guide.  Having a guide helped keep all the girls together and traveling at the same pace.

If there were no guides, I think it would be a good idea to give all the girls a worksheet to complete to be handed in (this gives them something to do and to actually look at exhibits instead of just running through the whole thing and wasting time at the end).  I would also set a meeting time and place so that the girls have a target time to complete by.

 

On a side note, the museum itself was an interesting experience.  I thought some of the exhibits and artifacts were great to see, but there was a lot of emphasis on how the Jews were victimized.  The whole concept built around the museum was supposed to be to build tolerance for everyone, but by focusing on the victims makes it seem more like a pity party than a museum to educate people about what happened.  Within the museum there was another part that described other forms of genocides, such as the Rwandan Genocide.  In this exhibit, they talked about the Tutsi and the Hutu ethnic groups and how each one would attack and kill the other when one group was in power.  From my knowledge, there is actually another subgroup that is neither Tutsi or Hutu, but live amongst the other two groups.  This group was never even mentioned in this exhibit.  I feel like if they wanted an example of tolerance, then this subgroup (Sufi’s I think?) would be the best example of tolerance because they were the ones that did not take any sides, instead they lived with both groups.  The same way with the Jewish holocaust exhibit, there could have been some sort of mention of tolerance from the victims’ perspective, instead of only noting the bad things that happened to the Jews caused by the German Nazis.  Nevertheless, it was interesting to look at all the artifacts, but it was just the message that they wanted to portray that was lacking (in my opinion).

UBC CFE Day 6 (Monday)

Today we were transferred to another school.  This new school is an all-girls Catholic school.  There was a lot of anxiety going into the school as Tim (another teacher candidate) and I are two young male teacher candidates and didn’t know what to expect from a school with all girls (and only 4-5 male teachers).  Despite our anxieties, we just went with the flow and everything turned out alright.  This school had a class system that I’ve never seen before.  In all the schools that I’ve been in in Canada, the teachers have their own classroom(s) and students go to the appropriate classes.  In Technologico de Monterrey both teachers and students move from classroom to classroom depending on what was scheduled for their classes (just like in university).  At this girls’ Catholic School, the students stay in their classroom (except for certain subjects) and the teachers goes around to different classrooms based on the subjects they teach.  I think it is an interesting concept, however, it means that there is a certain amount of time where the classrooms have no teacher, which opens up the opportunity for the students to cause trouble.

In the classes we attended today, we were less observer and more teacher.  Since there was an English teacher that was  absent, we acted as her substitutes.  For one class they just had to use vocabulary words in sentences to show their understanding.  We revamped the lesson by encouraging drawing pictures or a comic, writing paragraphs or a short story.

The next class compared and contrasted “The Outsiders” movie and novel.  We used a think-pair-share style of discussion, this seemed to work very well, because the girls really like to talk in class, and the think-pair-share allows for a lot of talking.

The last class that we were in had the teacher present in class.  She had asked us before the class to create an activity for the students to do a review of the their course content.  Even though we ourselves are not English teachers, so we didn’t know exactly the technical things, the activity was good enough that the teacher wanted to keep so that she could use it for another one of her classes.  This game starts by having the teacher(s) draw two pre-made slips of paper, one with a basic English sentence another with the tense that students had to transpose the sentence into.  The students, who were already split into teams, would discuss the answers and send a representative racing to the front to write it on the board.  The first team to write the correct answer would get a point for their team.  The girls got very engaged with the game and were super competitive.

What today taught me was thinking quickly on your feet as a substitute teacher.  During my practicum I had filled in occasionally for my SAs, but those were in my teachable subjects.  This taught me to think quickly and improvise in a subject that is not in my teachable areas.