Task 7 – Mode-Bending

Below is the link to an interactive digital book created for a Grade 2/3 class. This is my mode-bending task for week 7.  Enjoy!

Reflections

I changed the mode of the original task that consisted of describing a picture of the contents of my bag to creating an interactive digital book. Not only did I change the platform to present the task but I also designed the book for a younger target audience, a Grade 2/3 class. I used the online program, Book Creator, for this mode-bending task. With the Book Creator program, I am able to embed pictures, infographics, videos, weblinks, and GIFs. I can also change the color, fonts, and size of the text to make it more legible and appealing to the reader.  I chose this digital platform because it is engaging and highly visual for the audience to view and read. It is also accessible for all types of learners due to the adaptations that are available such as having the book be read aloud to the readers. The concept behind this design is to motivate and inspire the reader to create their own digital book after viewing mine.

The New London Group (1996) proposes that teachers are “seen as designers of learning processes and environments” and that “learning and productivity are the results of the designs of complex systems of people, environments, technology, beliefs and texts” (p 73).  The notion of design is correlated with creative intelligence and this is the basis for how educational technology can play an integral part in the classroom. The ability to foster language in an innovative and creative way will motivate even the most reluctant learners to be interested.

References

Book Creator. http://www.bookcreator.com

The New London Group.  (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. (Links to an external site.)  Harvard Educational Review 66(1), 60-92.

Linking to Katherine Kelly’s Post – Emoji Story

Katherine Kelly’s Post – Emoji Story

Task 6: Emoji Story

What web authoring tool have they chosen to manifest their work?

Katherine used https://emojipedia.org as the tool to present her Emoji story, This was after noticing that the copy and paste function from https://emojikeyboard.io; did not transfer correctly. I also noticed this same problem when trying to copy the emoji story onto the blog site, it changed the overall look of the emojis selected. When I copied and pasted onto a Word document, then the look of the emojis remained the same. I also connected with the struggle of being unable to search for emojis to retell my story, which made the task more difficult. I noticed that on https://emojikeyboard.io, there were different systems to choose from when it came to selecting a Emoji type (Twitter, Google, WhatsApp). I wonder what Emoji type was used for https://emojikeyboard.io and if there are other “types” out there for people to use?

Katherine also included a video “Frozen as Told by Emoji” to prove Bolter’s (2001) argument that images have the ability to bypass written work altogether. As I was watching this video, I was impressed by the use of emojis, but what we didn’t have was the ability to use music, sound effects, and animations within our Emoji story. What a difference it makes when you change the mode of presentation to make it conducive to all audiences. This video supported the visual, audio, and musical learner.

What literacies compare and deny in comparison and contrast to yours? 

Katherine chose to translate a classic picture book for her Emoji story, The Very Hungry Caterpillar by Eric Carle. She focused on individual words from each page of the book to represent her Emoji story. I focused on the ideas of the plot for the TV series, This is Us, to create my Emoji story. I believe that Katherine had an easier time translating her book into Emojis because the majority of her book contains nouns, which can easily be found in emoji form. I had a more difficult task since the TV series I decided to retell is about 6 seasons worth of content. So I focused on the main characters and briefly described the major events that happened with this family.

Katherine included a title in her Emoji Story, whereas I did not.  My title is too difficult to replace the words with emojis, since there are no concrete nouns within the title.

 What theoretical underpinnings are evident in your/your colleague’s textual architecture and how does this affect one’s experience of the work?

We both quoted from Bolter’s (2001) work in this task, and are both understanding of his point that emojis/visual images provide viewers with a visual experience that allows for an appropriate realization. The more visual the material, the more engaged the audience will be. Using emojis is a different kind of digital literacy that includes the need for translating, evaluating, analyzing and reading skills. Emojis have become a part of our language, especially in the digital world of texting and emails. They are an informal way of communicating but emojis provide context to what the writer is expressing in a quick manner.

References

Chapter 4. Bolter, J. D. (2001). Writing space: Computers, hypertext, and the remediation of print (2nd ed.). Mahwah, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. doi:10.4324/9781410600110

Emoji Story

Click on the link below to access my Emoji Story

An Emoji-Story

  • Did you rely more on syllables, words, ideas or a combination of all of them? I relied on ideas for this Emoji Story. The plot line to this TV Series is too complicated to translate into syllables and words since it follows the storyline of 5 main characters from the past, present, and future. I decided to keep it simple and provide only the main ideas of what has happened in the last 6 seasons of this series. I believe that the emojis that I have selected are substantial enough for readers to be able to translate and analyze the plot line.

After reading J.D. Bolter’s chapter titled, The Breakout of the Visual, he describes an ancient rhetoric technique called ekphrasis. He describes this technique by stating that “ekphrasis sets out to rival visual art in words, to demonstrate that words can describe vivid scenes without re­course to pictures. Ekphrasis also indicates that the writer is preoccupied with the visual, for in order to rival the visual, the prose must become de­scriptive in an effort to find the equivalent of what is “naturally” a visual ex­perience. The attempt to make words do what pictures do might be taken to mean that pictures are primary and words secondary” (p 56). Now with advancement of digital media and popularity with graphic novels, there is now a “reverse ekphrasis in which images are given the task of explaining words” (p 56). Therefore, words aren’t always necessary since text can be replaced by symbols and pictures to convey meaning. What is missing is the prose, emotion, and personal connections that a reader would receive while reading the words.

Did you start with the title? Why? Why not? I did not start with the title because I could not find the correct emojis to replace the words verbatim. I really did want to include the title but I couldn’t figure out how to translate it using only emojis. I figured out why the task was so difficult. The words in the title are not nouns  or adjectives and therefore I could not add a symbol to signify the the meaning of the title. The library selection with emojis seems to be all noun based symbols and images. The only non-noun emojis are the expressions which would be an adjective

  • Did you choose the work based on how easy would it be to visualize? I chose this work because it is a popular and current TV series that I’m sure people are aware of. The storyline is easy to visualize which made it less of a challenge to explain the plot using emojis. Before emojis were created, Bolter speaks of the interactive verbal text known as a MOO. He argues that a MOO is an example of ekphrasis, where ” the reader follows elec­tronic links from screen to screen and so constructs the text in the act of reading” (p 75). Bolter predicted in his book that “more graphically sophisti­cated MOOs will no doubt eventually exploit full-motion animation and video, and in the process they will remediate film and television and further diminish the status of any text that appears in this electronic environment” (76). These graphically sophisticated MOOs that Bolter speaks of started with emojis and have now morphed into GIFs. He couldn’t have predicted it any better!

References

Chapter 4. Bolter, J. D. (2001). Writing space: Computers, hypertext, and the remediation of print (2nd ed.). Mahwah, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. doi:10.4324/9781410600110

Emoji Keyboard Online. https://emojikeyboard.io

Linking to Georgia’s Post – Manual Scripts

Georgia’s Post – Manual Scripts

https://blogs.ubc.ca/gkadawong/2022/06/09/task-4-manual-scripts/

Georgia’s pictures from  her post on Manual Scripts

  • What web authoring tool have they chosen to manifest their work? Georgia chose to use photo documentation to showcase her work. She wrote everything out by hand and provided photographs of her writing journey. Georgia even provided photos of her main subject, Kuma, to provide context behind her written journal entry of Kuma’s first camping trip. By choosing to write her post by hand, this allowed for a free flow of thoughts to be composed that was authentic. Her writing emitted flow within the words, emotions could be conveyed, and it also allowed the reader to be a part of something personal to connect with the author. I was able to draw similarities and differences within the writing sample to my own. We both crossed out mistakes in our writing sample and admit to not being strict on formal edits when writing freely.

 

  • What literacies compare and deny in comparison and contrast to yours? I would like to focus on the writing tools that Georgia chose to compose her writing sample. I noticed right away, before reading the words, that she used two different coloured pens and a pencil for this task. It made me question why this was the case. As I read her writing, she addresses the reasons for the multiple writing tools for the task as a strategy plan. She discussed that efficiency is the main difference between writing by hand versus mechanized forms of writing. Georgia provided the example of how her original pen failed her and therefore she had to find a substitute. When writing about her camping trip, Georgia chose to write in pen because she was not concerned with providing formal edits and therefore this allowed for a free flow of thoughts without constraints. I also used ink for my writing sample because I felt the exact same way. There is a formality behind a typed out piece of writing, where the expectation is that it will be free of errors. I noticed that she used ink to highlight the questions for her reflections and answered the questions using pencil. The use of different writing tools to differentiate headings vs personal written thoughts, draws attention to the reader’s eyes. Georgia’s choice in using pencil when writing out her reflections allowed her the convenience of making “edits easier and more formally with an eraser.” I chose not to use pencil for this task because I find it physically harder to write with a pencil. You have to push down harder to have the lead transfer onto the paper and the width of the pencil hurts my fingers while writing, especially during long durations or if I’m writing quickly. Thus is the reason I chose to type out my reflections so that the writing appears more formalized and I was able to edit my work using the mechanics of software such as autocorrect spell checking. So I have to agree with Georgia that one of the main differences between writing by hand and mechanized writing is efficiency but I would like to add presentation and formality to the list as well.

 

  •  What theoretical underpinnings are evident in your/your colleague’s textual architecture and how does this affect one’s experience of the work?  As I was reading Georgia’s post, I observed that she wrote her journal entry into the middle of a notebook which makes it appear that it had been used before.  When listening to the creators of the podcast, Stuff to Blow Your Mind, in their episode, “From the Vault: Invention of the Book, Part 1,” they speak of the purpose behind a book. The podcasters provide the argument that “books are fixed memories in documentation” and contain thoughts that are frozen. Books are a way of “storing and disseminating information” and an “extension of the human mind.” Although Georgia’s book is more of a journal, it is personal and it is a way for her to express herself. Journals or diaries are not always meant to be shared with an audience so I wonder how the writing would’ve changed if it was for her eyes only.

Journals are a kind of archaeological evidence, in text form, that represents the evolution of one’s life. The things I wrote about when I was in elementary school versus high school are drastically different. It shows how I have evolved overtime emotionally, socially, and personally. Even the physical shape and type of books I would write in changed over time. The type of diaries I used in elementary school included ones with a cute cover that came with a lock and key. The journals I kept in high school were more in the shape and form of notebooks.  I still have these diaries and journals but they are stored deep inside my garage and away from my children to find them. These documented memories are only fixed in writing and not in real life, thank goodness!

References

Georgia. Manual Scripts. https://blogs.ubc.ca/gkadawong/2022/06/09/task-4-manual-scripts/

Stuff To Blow Your Mind, entitled “From the Vault: Invention of the Book”, Part 1.

Task 4 – Manual Scripts

  • Do you normally write by hand or type? Did you find this task difficult or easy? When I write, it is normally by hand. Wether it’s writing reminders to myself on post it notes or taking notes for course readings, I find that it easier to write it out manually. When writing by hand, there is always something available to write on (paper, napkin, receipt!) and write with (pencil, pen, lipstick!).  Although, I do consider myself a fast and accurate typer, I don’t always have my laptop on hand when needing to write something down. I need a keyboard if I must type since I am not a big fan of the on screen keyboard that is available on mobile devices. The accuracy of my writing is greater when using a physical keyboard vs texting on a digital keyboard. Thank goodness for autocorrect, although the choices in words aren’t always what I want!

I should mention that when I am writing for adults, the style is different than when I write for my students. When I write on the board or provide written comments to my younger students, I switch to printing the words. The craft of cursive writing is a controversial topic and is not taught as commonly as when I was an elementary student. So many times I have heard people say that it is a “waste of time” or that it is “a dying art.” (To this I get quite heated and counter-argue their opinions.)  Therefore, I can’t expect my students to be able to read my writing, which is a combination of cursive and printing. I believe and know there are benefits to teaching cursive writing to young students and that is why I incorporate it into my teaching. So depending on who will be reading my writing, the style changes to suit audience.

  • What did you do when you made a mistake or wanted to change your writing? Since I used ink on paper, I crossed out my errors and made corrections. There weren’t too many obvious errors, but the ones I did cross out were either spelling or word choice errors. If this was a document that was to be properly edited, I would’ve used white out tape to disguise my errors. I would’ve also wrote with more care and decreased my speed while writing so that it is more legible. Since this was a free flow of thoughts, I wasn’t as conscientious and strict with how my writing looked overall. 
  • What do you feel is the most significant difference between writing by hand and using mechanized forms of writing?                                                                                  I believe that when writing by hand, it is a form of art and expression. Penmanship defines one’s individuality and craft when writing by hand. I loved learning cursive writing in elementary school and if you analyze my writing, it is a mixture of cursive and printing. I’ve had mixed reactions to my writing style from my colleagues. One person mentioned that I had romantic writing and another said that it was not legible. Either way, I like my writing style because it is unique to me. Although, sometimes I do wish I had that perfect Kindergarten teacher printing. When using mechanized forms of writing, the expression and art are replaced with pre-programmed font choices. The individual expression in the formation and strokes of letters when writing by hand is lost when it becomes mechanized. There is a sense of formality when it comes to a typed out piece of writing, which is conducive to various formats such as reports, evaluations, and articles. So depending on the purpose and the content that is behind the reason for the writing, the style of the text will be decided upon.

Linking to Sam Charles’ Portfolio “Voice to Text”

http://https://blogs.ubc.ca/samcharles5402022s/2022/06/03/task-3-voice-to-text-task/

Sam Charles’ Video Post

  • How has your colleague’s experience differed from yours? And how do you know?

I appreciated Sam Charles’ post on “Voice to Text” in that he decided to present his reflection in a form of a video with closed captioning subtitles. As a visual learner, I was able to watch, read, and listen to his reflections on the topic. Sam had a different experience from me in that he was more successful in the outcome of this task. I had unknown trouble shooting issues with my recording which I now know is due to not using a device that has a microphone that is of close proximity to my mouth. I can see that he had a head set with an embedded microphone attachment to it. Therefore, the translation of his recording is more accurate , whereas my transcript was a string of repetition and nonsense words. Although the grammar and syntax was incorrect in some areas of Sam’s transcript, they are minor errors in comparison to my transcript.

  • What web authoring tool have they chosen to manifest their work?

Sam chose to use  Adobe Premiere PRO to create the video and provide the transcription for the closed captioning tool.

The video provided a personal connection between the viewer and the author. It made the text being read more meaningful because I could see who was speaking and it felt as if Sam was talking directly to me. I could hear the rhythm and thought process in his voice as he was speaking, which helped me to analyze his transcript and derive meaning to the text. The video quality was quite grainy but the volume and clarity of Sam’s voice was able to be heard without any issues.

  • Other Thoughts

Since the pandemic, educators have been challenged with adapting lessons to be accessible online for students learning from home. When B.C. educators taught remotely in the Spring of 2020, we had less than a month to create and provide a program using an online platform that we had no previous training in using. In Vancouver, we were restricted to only using Microsoft TEAMS to deliver content and provide communication to our students. When I recorded my Math lessons, there was a transcript provided. Each line was time stamped and included every word and sound I made, including when I laughed out loud! These recordings ended up being beneficial to my students that couldn’t attend live meetings but could watch the recording and still participate in the learning.

Fast track to current times, we are still maintaining class TEAMS pages but it is mainly used as a space to provide reminders and post assignments. Perhaps, this platform can be utilized for more than just this basic purpose.  I have read about the Blended Learning Environment, in which Vaughan et al. defines it as “the organic integration of thoughtfully selected and complementary face-to-face and online approaches and technologies.” This model supports a “framework for principles and guidelines that shape the design process of choosing content, creating student learning activities of collaboration and interaction, and identifying assessment procedures” (p 21).

This availability of providing online tutorials, recorded by the teacher, allows for an extension of learning to occur and for the parents to be included in the process as well. This is something I have been thinking about incorporating into my TEAMS page, especially when introducing a new skill or program such as coding. It would be like my very own Kahn academy within my TEAMS page!

References

Charles, Sam. “Voice to Text” http://https://blogs.ubc.ca/samcharles5402022s/2022/06/03/task-3-voice-to-text-task/

Vaughan, et al. (2013), Teaching in Blended Learning Environments: Creating and Sustaining Communities of Inquiry (pp 19-44).

Task 3: Voice to Text

My exert on speechnotes.co

The topic of the task

 

Task 3 Voice to Text, June 2, 2022

——————-

For this for this assignment I will tell you I’ll tell you about my Mother’s Day gift my family this year. As long as Laughry little libraries in the neighborhood ladies. My walks a map out where the three little my walks a map out where the three little are and See what types of books are for the people. Epson sizes of his three little eps and sizes of his three little always interesting, hi People neighborhood. It’s also interesting to see what types of books a little libraries for people to little libraries for people to because it really shows what sort ages The people in the community. Only a family oriented only a family oriented or mainly adult mainly adult. Children’s books children’s books especially picture books but at one to get quite excited if I find it I love it before in the past. This year this year surprise me with my own little to two Apple outside of my house or sorry our house or sorry our house. You you Julys what the most are like. Can you put the little library is A put the little library is as a a frame whe route. Launch the open launch the opens of the door and then on the in is space for the books is space for the books.. So that it’s too loud that it’s too loud. There’s a window to the front door so that people can peek in so that people can peek in without it. My daughter’s painted my daughter’s paint eyed musi Musi oil based outdoor oil based outdoor paint paint background colors background colors are ones of us it sounds orange red and prince orange red and puts all blinded beautifully beautifully ed. The silhouettes that they painted on silhouettes that they pended on the shed of black and and they a nice a name things that we love when we bar our Quetion’s. There are there are of flowers dragonfly dragonfly and a hummingbird. The little library is actually the little library is actually the so we cement in a wooden cement in a wooden the front of our house To support the little library library. So this past weekend we said so this past weekend we supposed and it’s a white. So now the next stage it’s to place the little is to place the little on top with the stand and we are screwing it in right edit. I already have some but I already have some but I need to put into this little light. Bag of books back of books to go. I’m excited to have them excited to have as a part of but it and I hope that our neighbor that our neighbor add to it And love it too and love it to.

Speechnotes 🙂 https://speechnotes.co

Reflections of the Task

Initial thoughts: I was extremely surprised and shocked by how inaccurate the translation of my recording was for this voice to text task using the website Speechnotes. I have used the voice to text function using the microphone on the keyboard for my iPad and iPhone and have not encountered so many “mistakes” before. I also encourage my students to use this accessibility tool as an adaptation to written output to be used for assessment. After some testing and troubleshooting, I realized that the recording was not accurate because of a weak connection between my voice and the microphone on my MacBook Air. When I re-recorded the same story on Speechnotes using my iPhone, the translation was much more precise!  I was able to hold the device and speak directly into the microphone, which I believe made a huge difference.

I chose to keep the original recording to reflect upon since it will allow for a different perspective of how using accessibility tools could possibly “fail.” It is a learning opportunity for me as an educator to remember that technology can’t always be relied upon to work right away. As a Teacher Librarian, I also take on the role as the media specialist at school. Therefore, when introducing anything new (technology wise) to my students, I have to always test it out first in order for me to set them up for success. A part of the job is also problem solving any trouble shooting issues, which seems to be an everyday occurrence!

*The thoughts below were written before I realized it was an issue involving my microphone on the laptop and not Speechnotes.*

How does the text deviate from conventions of written English?                                     The text that was recorded using the Speechnotes website deviated from the conventions of written English in many different ways. As an educator, I teach my students to recognize patterns in letter formation before practicing how to write it. Then we look at how these letters can be strung together to make a word and how words can form a sentence. Once the mechanics of writing are taught then we look at the conventions which include grammar, spelling, and word choice. The above exert seems to be a display of “what not to do” in writing. Although the text can be read, it is not legible in the sense that the writing is easy to follow. The consistency of errors in every sentence makes it very hard to read because the conventions of written English seem to have been omitted. As I read it from an educator’s point of view, I would think that I am reading the writing of one who is learning English as a second language. The repetition, spelling, and grammatical errors all seem to be consistent of an ELL student.

When using Speechnotes, I was surprised as to how many errors were made, which made me wonder why is this the case? The iPhone seems to have an innate ability to recognize what you are trying to say by offering suggestions for word choice and spelling suggestions. It will also correct simple grammar mistakes if the sentence is short enough to analyze. Speechnotes also did this but not to the quality of what my iPhone is able to do. So this puts things into perspective when introducing adaptations to writing for struggling students who may be using voice to text tools for written output. An educator needs to select and analyze the tools first before having a student use it in order for them to gain success.

(Now that I know that it was a microphone issue on my laptop, I have learned that to be successful you should use a device that has a microphone where you can speak directly into it or use a headset that has an attached mic.)

What is “wrong” in the text? What is “right”?                                                                  The majority of the syntax, grammar, word choice, and spelling within the recorded exert was “wrong.” With all these errors, the purpose and topic of the text was lost. What was “right” were the use of capitals at the beginning of each sentence and the use punctuation, such as periods and apostrophes. Surprisingly, difficult words such as “assignment, neighbourhood, oriented, and silhouettes,” were recorded and translated properly!

What are the most common “mistakes” in the text and why do you consider them “mistakes”?                                                                                                                              The most common “mistakes” that occurred were the repetition of words and word choice selection throughout the exert. I know I did not repeat myself which makes me wonder why the site translated it as such. Perhaps it is the mechanics of the website where if the speaker pauses, then it is forced to repeat the previous set of words? Or maybe there is an issue with my microphone? I did witness that when I began a new thought to my story, it did not always record the first few words so it looked like an incomplete thought when translated.

When it came to mistakes in word choice, I am wondering if it is because of the way I pronounced certain words. In my experience using voice to text applications with my students, the tool does not adjust for speech delays or articulation difficulties. Therefore, a student who has unintelligible speech  will have a difficult time being successful using voice to text to communicate their thoughts. This can cause a lot of frustration and learned helplessness to occur in students because instead of using a tool that is supposed to help them, it is actually amplifying their weaknesses.

What if you had “scripted” the story? What difference might that have made? If I had “scripted” the story, the difference would be an edited piece of work that has flow in the text. The writing would have flow to its sentences and I would be able to recite it without any breaks or pauses. The piece would be edited to ensure that the use of punctuation is correct and I would ensure that this is included into the recording. The recording wouldn’t be as authentic if the story was scripted.

In what ways does oral storytelling differ from written storytelling?                     Oral storytelling requires more effort and responsibility from generations of people to pass down stories to preserve the tradition. As I was viewing Alexander MacDonald’s TedTalk on “Oral Tradition in the Age of Smart Phones,” he noted that there is “more information in stories than in the script” and that “stories come with a culture.” However, he also challenges the notion that digital tools have allowed for instant accessibility for a new group of people to watch, share and repeat these stories that may be found online. With this instant accessibility, oral storytelling traditions can be innovated and honoured by a new culture of people who can derive their own sense of learning into the oral tradition by clarifying and analyzing the stories within their own contexts. There is a relationship of connectedness that combines oral storytelling and written storytelling together. Although the mechanics and traditions are quite different between the two, they are related in the sense that these stories are meant to be heard, shared, and repeated.

References                                                                                                                                Speechnotes: Speech to Text Online Notepad. https://speechnotes.co

MacDonald, A. (February, 2016). [Video]. Oral Tradition in the Age of Smart Phones.