Categories
Uncategorized

How Does It Stack Up?

Continuing on with my breakfast theme, one of my main breakfasts is cereal. In particular, the box of cereal right now in my cupboard is Nature’s Path Flax Plus Cereal. I thought that this company/ product would be a good one to investigate due to Nature’s Path’s commitment to the environment. I think it will be interesting to see how it is possible for companies to be environmentally- conscious, yet still profit from their products.

Naturally, I first went to the Nature’s Path Website. Their company vision is the following:

“To be a trusted name for quality organic foods in every home; socially responsible, environmentally sustainable and financially viable.”

-Arran Stephens, Founder

They source all their ingredients from organic farms and are in the process of purchasing farmland and converting it to organic. They were also waste-free certified in 2010 and are on the way to being carbon neutral by 2020. In fact, on this page of their website, they even note many of the prominent environmental thinkers like Wendell Berry and Sir Albert Howard that we have studied in our own readings during this course. They seem to have a connection to the land that many companies have lost over time as farms become of a larger and larger scale. One thing that I really appreciated from their website was the fact that they introduce the farmers that actually grow their ingredients. Nature’s Path wants their customers to be aware of where their food is coming from.

 

Reading about this company and its business practices has made me a lot more aware of the profound differences between organic products and non-organic products. Organic farms tend to be smaller, they use very few chemicals  and the people who run them have a connection to their land that leads to better stewardship. Because “organic” is sometimes a fluid term, here is a table that describes what it really means:

One thing that really struck me from their website was this fact:

“If only 10,000 medium sized farms in the U.S. converted to organic production, they would store so much carbon in the soil that it would be equivalent to taking 1,174,400 cars off the road, or reducing car miles driven by 14.62 billion miles. Converting the U.S.’s 160 million corn and soybean acres to organic production would sequester enough carbon to satisfy 73 percent of the Kyoto targets for CO2 reduction in the U.S. U.S. agriculture as currently practiced emits a total of 1.5 trillion pounds of CO2 annually into the atmosphere. Converting all U.S. cropland to organic would not only wipe out agriculture’s massive emission problem. By eliminating energy-costly chemical fertilizers, it would actually give us a net increase in soil carbon of 734 billion pounds.”

Source: http://www.newfarm.org/depts/NFfield_trials/1003/carbonsequest_print.shtml.

Obviously, if more companies were willingly to invest the time and money to have similar business practices to Nature’s Path, we would be less reliant on fossil fuels as a whole and  our agricultural practices would be must more sustainable. I can feel confident purchasing Nature’s Path products, not only because of their organic certification but also because of their company values. Although there is likely still some oil usage in both producing and packaging this cereal product, buying from this company is a better choice than many other companies. While I don’t necessarily always buy organic foods due to higher costs, reading about companies like this one make me think that the higher costs might be worth it.

 

Categories
Uncategorized

The Oil We Eat

Hello and Welcome!

This blog is meant to be a series of reflections on my daily food consumption and how it impacts the environment. As a busy student and athlete, I do focus on my food consumption, but mostly on its nutrition and ability to fuel me though long days and hard workouts. However, in the posts that follow, I am going to consider an alternative aspect of the food I eat: its environmental impact. In particular, I will look at where my food comes from and how it is processed and packaged. Although I don’t usually consider the environmental impact of my food choices when I am at the grocery store, being a part of the History 106 course has made me more aware of the impacts of my consumer habits. Over the next while, I will be looking into some of the foods that I consider to be the staples of my diet and what role oil plays in their production. Hopefully this process will allow me to make more informed choices in the future!

Categories
Uncategorized

Fueling a Coffee Habit

I am definitely one of those people who can’t begin their day until they’ve had a cup of coffee. So, I decided that it would be appropriate as the first thing to look deeper into.

Did you know that, next to oil, coffee is the second most traded commodity on worldwide markets? It is also grown in more than 80 countries and employs roughly 20 million farmers! (1) Clearly this is a huge industry. However, something that is worthy to point out is that the countries that produce coffee beans are not the largest consumers of it. Here is a chart which shows the largest coffee producing countries in the world:

This is in contrast to the largest coffee consuming countries: the European Union (35%), the United States (25%), and Japan (9%)(1). Obviously, because of such large transport distances, the environmental footprint of my coffee-drinking habit goes way up.

My coffee of choice is usually Starbucks and so I decided to take a look to see if I could could find any information on the origin and processing of their coffee beans. I found the following video which points towards both the huge amount of human labour and energy costs associated with coffee production:

Satrbucks Coffee: Growing, Processing, Roasting

Not only does the transport globally of coffee involve tremendous amounts of oil but the actual coffee processing has high energy costs associated with it as well. I found this article discussing the energy burden of processing coffee in Costa Rica and new technologies that can be implemented to reduce these costs. In the article, the author suggests that 25 405 000 kWh and 142 268 cubic meters of fire wood are used annually for coffee drying and processing. This electrical energy is enough to power a Costa Rican community of 13 000 people for an entire year (2).

Obviously, although the coffee industry is a huge global industry, it does not run as energy-efficiently as it probably could. Huge transportation distances, coupled with the high energy costs of coffee bean processing require large amounts of oil. With so many people indulging their caffeine habit on a daily basis, it is important to recognize where our coffee is coming from and how much energy is used in its production.

 

References:

(1) Starbucks Coffee Company. http://mba.tuck.dartmouth.edu/pdf/2002-1-0023.pdf. Accessed Feb. 28, 2012.

(2) Chavez, Victor Julio et. al. Measuring and Managing the Environmental Cost of Coffee Production in Latin America. http://www.conservationandsociety.org/article.asp?issn=0972-4923;year=2009;volume=7;issue=2;spage=141;epage=144;aulast=Arce. Accessed Feb. 28, 2012.

Image Taken from: http://seekingalpha.com/article/294328-coffee-despite-brazilian-frost-colombian-weather-bearish-market-may-be-ahead

Spam prevention powered by Akismet